Profiles of transdermal alcohol concentration and their prediction of negative and positive alcohol-related consequences in young adults' natural settings.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1037/adb0001054
Veronica L Richards, Kimberly A Mallett, Robert J Turrisi, Shannon D Glenn, Michael A Russell
{"title":"Profiles of transdermal alcohol concentration and their prediction of negative and positive alcohol-related consequences in young adults' natural settings.","authors":"Veronica L Richards, Kimberly A Mallett, Robert J Turrisi, Shannon D Glenn, Michael A Russell","doi":"10.1037/adb0001054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) sensors provide a multidimensional characterization of drinking events that self-reports cannot. These profiles may differ in their associated day-level alcohol-related consequences, but no research has tested this. We address this using multilevel latent profile analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred twenty-two young adults who regularly engage in heavy drinking (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.3, 64% female, 79% non-Hispanic White) responded to surveys and wore TAC sensors for 6 consecutive days. We tested whether four previously identified TAC profiles: (1) high-fast (8.5% of days), (2) moderate-fast (12.8%), (3) low-slow (20.4%), and (4) little-to-no-drinking days (58.2%) differed in numbers of negative and positive consequences and in the odds that both consequence types occurred on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-fast (incident rate ratio [IRR<sub>low-slow</sub>] = 6.18; IRR<sub>little-to-no-drinking</sub> = 9.47) and moderate-fast (IRR<sub>low-slow</sub> = 3.71; IRR<sub>little-to-no-drinking</sub> = 5.68) days contained more negative consequences compared to low-slow and little-to-no-drinking days. High-fast (IRR = 2.05), moderate-fast (IRR = 1.88), and low-slow (IRR = 1.43) days contained more positive consequences than little-to-no-drinking days. The odds of having only positive consequences were highest on low-slow, χ²(3) = 9.10, <i>p</i> < .05, days but the odds of experiencing both consequence types increased on moderate-fast and high-fast days, χ²(3) = 39.63, <i>p</i> < .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to little-to-no-drinking days, TAC profiles indicative of drinking (high-fast, moderate-fast, and low-slow) contained more negative and positive consequences. However, the odds of experiencing <i>only</i> positive consequences were highest among low-slow days and decreased on moderate-fast and high-fast days as the odds of negative consequences rose. These findings provide novel evidence reinforcing harm reduction approaches that seek to maximize positives and minimize negatives of alcohol consumption through emphasis on slow-paced, low-volume drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"163-172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) sensors provide a multidimensional characterization of drinking events that self-reports cannot. These profiles may differ in their associated day-level alcohol-related consequences, but no research has tested this. We address this using multilevel latent profile analysis.

Method: Two hundred twenty-two young adults who regularly engage in heavy drinking (Mage = 22.3, 64% female, 79% non-Hispanic White) responded to surveys and wore TAC sensors for 6 consecutive days. We tested whether four previously identified TAC profiles: (1) high-fast (8.5% of days), (2) moderate-fast (12.8%), (3) low-slow (20.4%), and (4) little-to-no-drinking days (58.2%) differed in numbers of negative and positive consequences and in the odds that both consequence types occurred on the same day.

Results: High-fast (incident rate ratio [IRRlow-slow] = 6.18; IRRlittle-to-no-drinking = 9.47) and moderate-fast (IRRlow-slow = 3.71; IRRlittle-to-no-drinking = 5.68) days contained more negative consequences compared to low-slow and little-to-no-drinking days. High-fast (IRR = 2.05), moderate-fast (IRR = 1.88), and low-slow (IRR = 1.43) days contained more positive consequences than little-to-no-drinking days. The odds of having only positive consequences were highest on low-slow, χ²(3) = 9.10, p < .05, days but the odds of experiencing both consequence types increased on moderate-fast and high-fast days, χ²(3) = 39.63, p < .001.

Conclusions: Compared to little-to-no-drinking days, TAC profiles indicative of drinking (high-fast, moderate-fast, and low-slow) contained more negative and positive consequences. However, the odds of experiencing only positive consequences were highest among low-slow days and decreased on moderate-fast and high-fast days as the odds of negative consequences rose. These findings provide novel evidence reinforcing harm reduction approaches that seek to maximize positives and minimize negatives of alcohol consumption through emphasis on slow-paced, low-volume drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

年轻人自然环境中经皮酒精浓度及其对酒精相关负面和正面后果的预测
目的:经皮酒精浓度(TAC)传感器提供了自我报告无法提供的饮酒事件的多维特征。这些特征可能在与酒精相关的日常水平上有所不同,但没有研究对此进行过测试。我们使用多层潜在剖面分析来解决这个问题。方法:222名经常大量饮酒的年轻人(年龄= 22.3,64%女性,79%非西班牙裔白人)接受了调查,并连续6天佩戴TAC传感器。我们测试了四种先前确定的TAC特征:(1)高速度(8.5%),(2)中速(12.8%),(3)低速度(20.4%)和(4)少喝到不喝(58.2%)在消极和积极后果的数量以及两种后果类型在同一天发生的几率上是否存在差异。结果:快慢事故率比[IRRlow-slow] = 6.18;irlow -slow = 3.71;与低慢速和很少到不喝酒的日子相比,低慢速到不喝酒的日子有更多的负面影响。高快(IRR = 2.05)、中快(IRR = 1.88)和低慢(IRR = 1.43)天比少喝或不喝的天有更多的积极结果。仅出现阳性结果的几率在低慢日最高,χ 2 (3) = 9.10, p < 0.05,但在中快日和高快日出现两种结果的几率均增加,χ 2 (3) = 39.63, p < 0.001。结论:与很少或不饮酒的日子相比,TAC特征表明饮酒(高速,中速和低慢)包含更多的消极和积极后果。然而,只经历积极结果的几率在低慢的日子里是最高的,在中快和高快的日子里随着消极结果的几率增加而下降。这些发现提供了新的证据,加强了减少危害的方法,即通过强调慢节奏、低量饮酒,寻求最大限度地发挥酒精消费的积极作用,最大限度地减少消极作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信