Escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19: concordancia entre la versión administrada por evaluador versus autoevaluada en pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19

Q3 Medicine

Rehabilitacion Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rh.2024.100878

J. Betancourt-Peña , J. Rodriguez-Castro , V. Perez-Hortua , J.C. Ávila-Valencia , V. Benavides-Córdoba

{"title":"Escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19: concordancia entre la versión administrada por evaluador versus autoevaluada en pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19","authors":"J. Betancourt-Peña , J. Rodriguez-Castro , V. Perez-Hortua , J.C. Ávila-Valencia , V. Benavides-Córdoba","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may present sequelae which are called Post COVID-19 Syndrome or Long COVID in which physical, psychological and/or social complications are evident. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS) of the evaluator-administered version vs patient self-assessed in post-COVID-19 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with subsequent recovery. Once the project was approved by the ethics committee and the patients signed the informed consent, a survey was carried out to collect sociodemographic and clinical data and the application of the PCFS scale, in its two forms, self-administered and by an evaluator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>97 patients entered the study, 57.7% being women. The agreement analysis determined a concordance index of 0.857 95% CI (0.7-0.934) (almost perfect agreement). The agreement for women was 0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934 and for men 0.907 95% CI (0.806-1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of the Spanish version of the PCFS scale carried out by the health professional compared to the version self-assessed by patients, demonstrates adequate agreement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 1","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may present sequelae which are called Post COVID-19 Syndrome or Long COVID in which physical, psychological and/or social complications are evident. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS) of the evaluator-administered version vs patient self-assessed in post-COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Observational study in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with subsequent recovery. Once the project was approved by the ethics committee and the patients signed the informed consent, a survey was carried out to collect sociodemographic and clinical data and the application of the PCFS scale, in its two forms, self-administered and by an evaluator.

Results

97 patients entered the study, 57.7% being women. The agreement analysis determined a concordance index of 0.857 95% CI (0.7-0.934) (almost perfect agreement). The agreement for women was 0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934 and for men 0.907 95% CI (0.806-1).

Conclusion

The use of the Spanish version of the PCFS scale carried out by the health professional compared to the version self-assessed by patients, demonstrates adequate agreement.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[covid -19后功能状态量表：评估者给药版本与自评版本在covid -19后综合征患者中的一致性]。

诊断为COVID-19的患者可能出现被称为COVID-19后综合征或长COVID的后遗症，其中身体、心理和/或社会并发症很明显。本研究的目的是评估评估者给药版本的covid -19后功能状态量表（PCFS）与患者自我评估的covid -19后患者的一致性。方法：对确诊后康复的COVID-19患者进行观察性研究。一旦项目获得伦理委员会的批准，患者签署知情同意书，就开始进行调查，收集社会人口统计学和临床数据，并应用PCFS量表，有两种形式，一种是自我管理的，另一种是由评估者管理的。结果：97例患者入组，其中57.7%为女性。一致性分析确定一致性指数为0.857,95% CI(0.7 ~ 0.934)（几乎完全一致）。女性的一致性为0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934，男性为0.907 95% CI（0.806-1）。结论：卫生专业人员编制的西班牙语版PCFS量表与患者自行评定的PCFS量表比较，显示出充分的一致性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.