Comparing immunotherapy effectiveness for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: infiltrative versus non-infiltrative types in real-world settings.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241312141
Chien-Ming Chiang, Kuan-Kai Huang, Chun-Te Lee, Tzu-Chun Hong, Juei-Seng Wu, Hung-Tsung Wu, Ting-Tsung Chang, Yi-Sheng Liu, Wei-Ting Chen, Chung-Teng Wang, Chen Chang, Po-Jun Chen, Ming-Tsung Hsieh, Chiung-Yu Chen, Chiao-Hsiung Chuang, Ching-Chi Lee, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Yih-Jyh Lin, Hsin-Yu Kuo
{"title":"Comparing immunotherapy effectiveness for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: infiltrative versus non-infiltrative types in real-world settings.","authors":"Chien-Ming Chiang, Kuan-Kai Huang, Chun-Te Lee, Tzu-Chun Hong, Juei-Seng Wu, Hung-Tsung Wu, Ting-Tsung Chang, Yi-Sheng Liu, Wei-Ting Chen, Chung-Teng Wang, Chen Chang, Po-Jun Chen, Ming-Tsung Hsieh, Chiung-Yu Chen, Chiao-Hsiung Chuang, Ching-Chi Lee, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Yih-Jyh Lin, Hsin-Yu Kuo","doi":"10.1177/17588359241312141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a challenge in determining the optimal therapeutic approach. Immunotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a preferred first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, the overall effectiveness of ICIs in patients with infiltrative HCC remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of ICI treatment on clinical outcomes between patients with infiltrative and non-infiltrative HCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort consisting of unresectable HCC patients who underwent immunotherapy with ICIs, categorized into infiltrative and non-infiltrative groups was studied. Primary outcomes comprised treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 198 patients, 60 (30.3%) had infiltrative HCC, while 138 (69.7%) had non-infiltrative HCC. In the infiltrative group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55.0%. For the non-infiltrative group, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 56.5%, showing no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients in the infiltrative group had significantly shorter median of PFS and OS following immunotherapy, with a PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5-6.7; <i>p</i> = 0.0409) and an OS of 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-14.4; <i>p</i> = 0.0268), compared with the non-infiltrative group, which had a PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.2-7.6) and an OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.8-21.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For immunotherapy, infiltrative HCC exhibits treatment responses similar to non-infiltrative HCC. Nonetheless, infiltrative HCC is associated with shorter survival outcomes, compared with non-infiltrative type. Our findings emphasize the essential of considering type discrepancies when developing management strategies for immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359241312141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241312141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a challenge in determining the optimal therapeutic approach. Immunotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a preferred first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, the overall effectiveness of ICIs in patients with infiltrative HCC remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of ICI treatment on clinical outcomes between patients with infiltrative and non-infiltrative HCC.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort consisting of unresectable HCC patients who underwent immunotherapy with ICIs, categorized into infiltrative and non-infiltrative groups was studied. Primary outcomes comprised treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Of 198 patients, 60 (30.3%) had infiltrative HCC, while 138 (69.7%) had non-infiltrative HCC. In the infiltrative group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55.0%. For the non-infiltrative group, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 56.5%, showing no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients in the infiltrative group had significantly shorter median of PFS and OS following immunotherapy, with a PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5-6.7; p = 0.0409) and an OS of 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-14.4; p = 0.0268), compared with the non-infiltrative group, which had a PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.2-7.6) and an OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.8-21.8).

Conclusion: For immunotherapy, infiltrative HCC exhibits treatment responses similar to non-infiltrative HCC. Nonetheless, infiltrative HCC is associated with shorter survival outcomes, compared with non-infiltrative type. Our findings emphasize the essential of considering type discrepancies when developing management strategies for immunotherapy.

比较免疫疗法对不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效:真实世界中浸润型与非浸润型肝细胞癌的疗效。
背景:浸润性肝细胞癌(HCC)通常伴有不良预后,这对确定最佳治疗方法提出了挑战。采用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的免疫疗法已成为晚期HCC首选的一线治疗方法。然而,浸润性HCC患者使用ICIs的总体疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较ICI治疗对浸润性和非浸润性HCC患者临床结局的影响。材料和方法:回顾性研究了不可切除的HCC患者,并将其分为浸润性和非浸润性两组。主要结果包括根据实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)标准的治疗反应、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:198例患者中浸润性HCC 60例(30.3%),非浸润性HCC 138例(69.7%)。浸润组客观缓解率(ORR)为36.7%,疾病控制率(DCR)为55.0%。非浸润组的ORR为33.3%,DCR为56.5%,两组间差异无统计学意义。然而,浸润组患者在免疫治疗后PFS和OS的中位值明显较短,PFS为4.1个月(95% CI: 2.5-6.7;p = 0.0409), OS为10.4个月(95% CI: 6.7-14.4;p = 0.0268),而非浸润组PFS为5.5个月(95% CI: 3.2-7.6), OS为17.0个月(95% CI: 12.8-21.8)。结论:在免疫治疗方面,浸润性HCC表现出与非浸润性HCC相似的治疗反应。尽管如此,与非浸润性HCC相比,浸润性HCC的生存期较短。我们的研究结果强调了在制定免疫治疗管理策略时考虑类型差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信