Exploring childbirth experiences through a Salutogenic lens

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Dr Giliane McKelvin , Prof Soo Downe , Prof Gillian Thomson
{"title":"Exploring childbirth experiences through a Salutogenic lens","authors":"Dr Giliane McKelvin ,&nbsp;Prof Soo Downe ,&nbsp;Prof Gillian Thomson","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women's experiences of childbirth have generally been considered through a pathological lens. Wider sociological arguments associated with salutogenesis stress the need to depict health on a continuum to help understand what constitutes positive health as well as ill-health. Similarly, to fully understand women's experiences of childbirth, it needs to be explored on a continuum, considering salutogenic and pathogenic factors. In this paper we report on qualitative data collected as part of a wider mixed-methods study to describe the continuum of women's different childbirth experiences (‘positive’ ‘neutral’ or ‘traumatic’). A mixed-method explanatory sequential design was undertaken comprising validated measures and in-depth interviews. Primiparous women who were expecting a healthy term infant were recruited and participated in an in-depth semi-structured interview at 12 weeks postnatal. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Ten women took part in an interview and three main themes were identified. The first theme ‘before it all started’ showed how stories impacted women, with women trying to ‘keep an open mind’ or ‘accepting and expecting the worst’. The second theme ‘arriving at the destination’ emphasised the importance of midwifery support through ‘continuous compassionate presence’ while others reported ‘feeling forgotten’. Finally, ‘the days that followed’ highlighted how women tried to ‘focus on the outcome’ while others ‘wished it had gone better’. This study identified how women's subjective appraisals of childbirth are on a continuum and influenced by several factors including birth narratives and the quality of midwifery care from the early onset of labour. The kinds of experiences associated with reports that the birth was ‘neutral’ are reported for the first time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824003590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women's experiences of childbirth have generally been considered through a pathological lens. Wider sociological arguments associated with salutogenesis stress the need to depict health on a continuum to help understand what constitutes positive health as well as ill-health. Similarly, to fully understand women's experiences of childbirth, it needs to be explored on a continuum, considering salutogenic and pathogenic factors. In this paper we report on qualitative data collected as part of a wider mixed-methods study to describe the continuum of women's different childbirth experiences (‘positive’ ‘neutral’ or ‘traumatic’). A mixed-method explanatory sequential design was undertaken comprising validated measures and in-depth interviews. Primiparous women who were expecting a healthy term infant were recruited and participated in an in-depth semi-structured interview at 12 weeks postnatal. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Ten women took part in an interview and three main themes were identified. The first theme ‘before it all started’ showed how stories impacted women, with women trying to ‘keep an open mind’ or ‘accepting and expecting the worst’. The second theme ‘arriving at the destination’ emphasised the importance of midwifery support through ‘continuous compassionate presence’ while others reported ‘feeling forgotten’. Finally, ‘the days that followed’ highlighted how women tried to ‘focus on the outcome’ while others ‘wished it had gone better’. This study identified how women's subjective appraisals of childbirth are on a continuum and influenced by several factors including birth narratives and the quality of midwifery care from the early onset of labour. The kinds of experiences associated with reports that the birth was ‘neutral’ are reported for the first time.
通过健康透镜探索分娩经历。
人们通常从病理学的角度来看待妇女的分娩经历。与 "致救 "相关的更广泛的社会学论点强调,有必要从一个连续的角度来描述健康,以帮助理解什么是积极的健康,什么是不健康。同样,为了充分了解妇女的分娩经历,需要从连续统一体的角度对其进行探讨,同时考虑致救因素和致病因素。在本文中,我们报告了作为一项更广泛的混合方法研究的一部分所收集的定性数据,以描述妇女不同分娩经历("积极的"、"中性的 "或 "创伤性的")的连续性。该研究采用了一种混合方法解释性顺序设计,包括验证性测量和深入访谈。我们招募了期待健康足月婴儿出生的初产妇,她们在产后 12 周参加了半结构式深度访谈。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。十名妇女参加了访谈,并确定了三大主题。第一个主题 "一切开始之前 "显示了故事对妇女的影响,妇女试图 "保持开放的心态 "或 "接受并期待最坏的结果"。第二个主题 "到达目的地 "强调了助产士通过 "持续的同情 "提供支持的重要性,而其他人则表示 "感觉被遗忘"。最后,"接下来的日子 "强调了产妇如何努力 "专注于结果",而其他人则 "希望情况会更好"。这项研究发现,妇女对分娩的主观评价是一个连续的过程,并受到多种因素的影响,包括分娩叙述和助产士从分娩初期就开始提供的护理质量。首次报告了与分娩 "中性 "报告相关的经验类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信