Health Care Utilization Among Post-Stroke Women: Associations with Perceived Racism.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Molly Jacobs, Angela Miles, Charles Ellis
{"title":"Health Care Utilization Among Post-Stroke Women: Associations with Perceived Racism.","authors":"Molly Jacobs, Angela Miles, Charles Ellis","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Post-stroke health care is crucial for recovery and preventing complications. This study explored the association between perceived racism and health care utilization among post-stroke women, highlighting the disparate utilization patterns of marginalized racial/ethnic women. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The 2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey was used to characterize health care utilization among women with stroke diagnoses across different racial groups: White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Asian, Islander, Alaska Native/Other/Multiracial. Logistic regression analysis characterized the association between three types of health care utilizations-having a health insurance plan, a health care provider, and receiving a routine checkup-and perceived race-based treatment in the medical sector. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sample included 10,184 post-stroke women: 75.01% White, 12.42% Black, 6.77% Hispanic, and 5.80% Asian/AIAN/Other/multiracial. Only 2.95% of White women reported worse treatment, compared with 10.74% of Black, 13.19% of Asian/AIAN/Other/multiracial, and 8.85% of Hispanic women. Regression analysis revealed that Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, confidence interval [CI] = 0.17, 0.84) were less likely to have a health plan, though those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.62, 3.90). Black women were less likely to have a routine checkup (OR = 0.51, CI = 0.14, 0.77), but those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (OR = 2.72, CI = 1.64, 11.63). Women from other racial/ethnic groups, Black, and Hispanic women had lower odds of having a personal provider (ORs ranging from 0.17 to 0.69), though those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (ORs ranging from 1.79 to 3.39). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Perceived differences in treatment in the medical sector among marginalized post-stroke women were significantly associated with lower health care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Post-stroke health care is crucial for recovery and preventing complications. This study explored the association between perceived racism and health care utilization among post-stroke women, highlighting the disparate utilization patterns of marginalized racial/ethnic women. Methods: The 2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey was used to characterize health care utilization among women with stroke diagnoses across different racial groups: White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Asian, Islander, Alaska Native/Other/Multiracial. Logistic regression analysis characterized the association between three types of health care utilizations-having a health insurance plan, a health care provider, and receiving a routine checkup-and perceived race-based treatment in the medical sector. Results: The sample included 10,184 post-stroke women: 75.01% White, 12.42% Black, 6.77% Hispanic, and 5.80% Asian/AIAN/Other/multiracial. Only 2.95% of White women reported worse treatment, compared with 10.74% of Black, 13.19% of Asian/AIAN/Other/multiracial, and 8.85% of Hispanic women. Regression analysis revealed that Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, confidence interval [CI] = 0.17, 0.84) were less likely to have a health plan, though those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.62, 3.90). Black women were less likely to have a routine checkup (OR = 0.51, CI = 0.14, 0.77), but those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (OR = 2.72, CI = 1.64, 11.63). Women from other racial/ethnic groups, Black, and Hispanic women had lower odds of having a personal provider (ORs ranging from 0.17 to 0.69), though those receiving similar or better treatment had higher odds (ORs ranging from 1.79 to 3.39). Conclusions: Perceived differences in treatment in the medical sector among marginalized post-stroke women were significantly associated with lower health care utilization.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信