Delayed or forgone medical care associated with increased resource utilization and health care expenditures among patients with peripheral artery disease in the United States.
Kriyana P Reddy, Shreya Mehta, Lauren A Eberly, Sameed Ahmed M Khatana, Grace J Wang, Scott M Damrauer, Alexander C Fanaroff, Peter W Groeneveld, Jay Giri, Ashwin S Nathan
{"title":"Delayed or forgone medical care associated with increased resource utilization and health care expenditures among patients with peripheral artery disease in the United States.","authors":"Kriyana P Reddy, Shreya Mehta, Lauren A Eberly, Sameed Ahmed M Khatana, Grace J Wang, Scott M Damrauer, Alexander C Fanaroff, Peter W Groeneveld, Jay Giri, Ashwin S Nathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PAD affects >12 million Americans and poses significant financial burdens on patients, but the relationship between delayed/forgone (D/F) care and resource use in this population is unknown. We sought to assess the relationship between D/F care, resource use, and health care expenditures among patients with PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with PAD in the US were identified in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for years 2007-2017. Unweighted counts of reasons for D/F care were tabulated. Proportions of patients with ≥1 emergency department (ED), ≥1 inpatient, ≥1 outpatient, and >5 office-based encounters were compared using Rao-Scott adjusted Chi-Squared tests. Annual per capita total, out-of-pocket (OOP), ED, inpatient, outpatient, office-based visit, and prescription medication expenditures were compared using two-part econometric models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 2,926,654 patients with PAD. Among the 264,172 (9%) of patients with PAD reporting D/F care, 41.2% of patients cited financial barriers as the primary reason for D/F care. There were greater proportions of patients with ≥1 ED visits (52% vs 31%, P<0.001), ≥1 outpatient hospital visits (56% vs 43%, P=0.004), and >5 office-based visits (81% vs 71%, P=0.04) among those reporting D/F care versus those who did not. Patients with D/F care had $7,742 (95% CI $3,170-$12,314, P=0.001) greater per capita total and $5,156 (95% CI $692-$9,619, P=0.02) greater per capita inpatient expenditures per year than patients without D/F care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D/F care is associated with increased resource use and health care expenditures among patients with PAD. Further work is needed to elucidate the underlying causes of D/F care and mitigate financial burdens on PAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: PAD affects >12 million Americans and poses significant financial burdens on patients, but the relationship between delayed/forgone (D/F) care and resource use in this population is unknown. We sought to assess the relationship between D/F care, resource use, and health care expenditures among patients with PAD.
Methods: Adults with PAD in the US were identified in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for years 2007-2017. Unweighted counts of reasons for D/F care were tabulated. Proportions of patients with ≥1 emergency department (ED), ≥1 inpatient, ≥1 outpatient, and >5 office-based encounters were compared using Rao-Scott adjusted Chi-Squared tests. Annual per capita total, out-of-pocket (OOP), ED, inpatient, outpatient, office-based visit, and prescription medication expenditures were compared using two-part econometric models.
Results: The study cohort included 2,926,654 patients with PAD. Among the 264,172 (9%) of patients with PAD reporting D/F care, 41.2% of patients cited financial barriers as the primary reason for D/F care. There were greater proportions of patients with ≥1 ED visits (52% vs 31%, P<0.001), ≥1 outpatient hospital visits (56% vs 43%, P=0.004), and >5 office-based visits (81% vs 71%, P=0.04) among those reporting D/F care versus those who did not. Patients with D/F care had $7,742 (95% CI $3,170-$12,314, P=0.001) greater per capita total and $5,156 (95% CI $692-$9,619, P=0.02) greater per capita inpatient expenditures per year than patients without D/F care.
Conclusions: D/F care is associated with increased resource use and health care expenditures among patients with PAD. Further work is needed to elucidate the underlying causes of D/F care and mitigate financial burdens on PAD patients.
背景:PAD影响了近1200万美国人,并给患者带来了巨大的经济负担,但在这一人群中,延迟/放弃(D/F)治疗与资源使用之间的关系尚不清楚。我们试图评估PAD患者D/F护理、资源使用和医疗保健支出之间的关系。方法:在2007-2017年的医疗支出小组调查中确定了美国患有PAD的成年人。未加权的D/F护理原因计数被制成表格。使用Rao-Scott校正卡方检验比较急诊(ED)≥1例、住院≥1例、门诊≥1例和bbb50例办公室就诊患者的比例。使用两部分计量经济模型比较年度人均总、自费(OOP)、急诊科、住院、门诊、办公室就诊和处方药支出。结果:研究队列包括2926654例PAD患者。在264,172例(9%)报告D/F护理的PAD患者中,41.2%的患者认为经济障碍是D/F护理的主要原因。在报告D/F护理的患者中,有≥1次ED就诊的患者比例(52%对31%,P5次办公室就诊的患者比例(81%对71%,P=0.04)高于没有D/F护理的患者。与没有D/F护理的患者相比,接受D/F护理的患者每年人均住院费用高出7,742美元(95% CI $3,170- 12,314美元,P=0.001),人均住院费用高出5,156美元(95% CI $692- 9,619美元,P=0.02)。结论:D/F护理与PAD患者资源使用和卫生保健支出增加有关。需要进一步的工作来阐明D/F护理的潜在原因并减轻PAD患者的经济负担。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.