Measuring the Work Relative Value of Common Nursing Items for the General Departments of Tertiary Hospitals: A Descriptive Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yingli Wang, Cong Wang, Hongfei Ren, Ling Mao, Fenjiao Chen, Taoyun Liang, Yuqin Luo, Yan Jiang
{"title":"Measuring the Work Relative Value of Common Nursing Items for the General Departments of Tertiary Hospitals: A Descriptive Study","authors":"Yingli Wang,&nbsp;Cong Wang,&nbsp;Hongfei Ren,&nbsp;Ling Mao,&nbsp;Fenjiao Chen,&nbsp;Taoyun Liang,&nbsp;Yuqin Luo,&nbsp;Yan Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jep.14280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim(s)</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to evaluate the workload of clinical nurses by measuring the work relative value (work RVU) of common nursing items based on the resource-based relative value scale in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Various single measurements have been employed to measure the nursing workload, but no comprehensive method has yet to be developed in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive study was conducted to construct a common item set for nursing work in general wards on the basis of the 2019 History Information System nursing database from Class A tertiary hospitals to identify the time associated with each service. Data cleaning methods, expert consensus meetings, observational methods, Delphi consensus methods and the analytic hierarchy processes were employed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A common item set for nursing work was established, which contained 2 first-level indexes, 8 secondary-level indexes and 79 third-level indexes. The average working hours of the common items ranged from 1.38 to 23.76 min. The top three nursing items identified were: extra large dressing change, cleaning enema, and nasal feeding catheterization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The common nursing items used in general wards were universal. The work RVU of common items comprehensively evaluates clinical nurses' workload, which can better meet the needs of management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The work RVU of common items will facilitate effective and comprehensive allocation of nursing human resources and performance assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and named the reporting method.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim(s)

This study aims to evaluate the workload of clinical nurses by measuring the work relative value (work RVU) of common nursing items based on the resource-based relative value scale in China.

Background

Various single measurements have been employed to measure the nursing workload, but no comprehensive method has yet to be developed in China.

Methods

A descriptive study was conducted to construct a common item set for nursing work in general wards on the basis of the 2019 History Information System nursing database from Class A tertiary hospitals to identify the time associated with each service. Data cleaning methods, expert consensus meetings, observational methods, Delphi consensus methods and the analytic hierarchy processes were employed.

Results

A common item set for nursing work was established, which contained 2 first-level indexes, 8 secondary-level indexes and 79 third-level indexes. The average working hours of the common items ranged from 1.38 to 23.76 min. The top three nursing items identified were: extra large dressing change, cleaning enema, and nasal feeding catheterization.

Conclusions

The common nursing items used in general wards were universal. The work RVU of common items comprehensively evaluates clinical nurses' workload, which can better meet the needs of management.

Implications

The work RVU of common items will facilitate effective and comprehensive allocation of nursing human resources and performance assessment.

Reporting Method

We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and named the reporting method.

三级医院综合科常用护理项目工作相对价值测量的描述性研究。
目的:本研究旨在基于资源型相对价值量表,通过测量中国常见护理项目的工作相对价值(work RVU)来评估临床护士的工作量。背景:对护理工作量的测量采用了多种单一的测量方法,但国内尚未形成综合的测量方法。方法:采用描述性研究方法,以2019年“三甲医院历史信息系统”护理数据库为基础,构建普通病房护理工作共性项目集,识别各项服务相关时间。采用数据清洗法、专家共识会议法、观察法、德尔菲共识法和层次分析法。结果:建立了护理工作通用项目集,包括2个一级指标、8个二级指标和79个三级指标。常见项目的平均工作时间为1.38至23.76分钟。前三名的护理项目分别是:超大换药、清洁灌肠和鼻饲导尿。结论:普通病房常用护理项目具有普遍性。常用项目工作RVU综合评价临床护士工作量,能更好地满足管理需要。意义:共同项目的工作RVU将促进护理人力资源的有效和全面配置和绩效评估。报告方法:我们遵循赤道相关准则并命名报告方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信