Impact of depth of body cavity at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on open and laparoscopic liver resection of segment 7.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hidetoshi Gon, Shohei Komatsu, Hirotoshi Soyama, Motofumi Tanaka, Masahiro Kido, Kenji Fukushima, Takeshi Urade, Shinichi So, Toshihiko Yoshida, Keisuke Arai, Daisuke Tsugawa, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto
{"title":"Impact of depth of body cavity at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on open and laparoscopic liver resection of segment 7.","authors":"Hidetoshi Gon, Shohei Komatsu, Hirotoshi Soyama, Motofumi Tanaka, Masahiro Kido, Kenji Fukushima, Takeshi Urade, Shinichi So, Toshihiko Yoshida, Keisuke Arai, Daisuke Tsugawa, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03605-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of body-cavity depth on open (OLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segment 7 remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the influence of body-cavity depth at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on LLR and OLR of segment 7.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 101 patients who underwent segment-7 liver resection over 2010-2023 were included. Body-cavity depth was measured from the abdominal-wall surface to the deepest site on the right side of the liver. Patients were categorized into shallow (< 18.4 cm) and deep (≥ 18.4 cm) populations based on median body-cavity depth. We compared surgical outcomes between OLR and LLR in shallow and deep populations after propensity-score adjustments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In OLR and LLR groups, 27 and 22 patients in the shallow population, respectively, and 26 and 26 patients were included in the deep population, respectively, were included. The OLR group in the deep population had significantly greater blood loss than the corresponding LLR group (difference: 144 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): [50, 238], P = 0.004). Other surgical outcomes, including operative time, were similar between groups. In the shallow population, the OLR group had significantly shorter operative time (difference: - 54 mL, 95% CI: [-101, - 6], P = 0.028) and similar blood loss than the LLR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For segment-7 liver resection, LLR is likely favorable for patients with a deep body cavity, with similar operative time and lower blood loss compared to OLR. Body-cavity depth could be a useful indicator for determining the suitable surgical approach for segment-7 liver resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03605-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of body-cavity depth on open (OLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segment 7 remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the influence of body-cavity depth at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on LLR and OLR of segment 7.

Methods: In total, 101 patients who underwent segment-7 liver resection over 2010-2023 were included. Body-cavity depth was measured from the abdominal-wall surface to the deepest site on the right side of the liver. Patients were categorized into shallow (< 18.4 cm) and deep (≥ 18.4 cm) populations based on median body-cavity depth. We compared surgical outcomes between OLR and LLR in shallow and deep populations after propensity-score adjustments.

Results: In OLR and LLR groups, 27 and 22 patients in the shallow population, respectively, and 26 and 26 patients were included in the deep population, respectively, were included. The OLR group in the deep population had significantly greater blood loss than the corresponding LLR group (difference: 144 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): [50, 238], P = 0.004). Other surgical outcomes, including operative time, were similar between groups. In the shallow population, the OLR group had significantly shorter operative time (difference: - 54 mL, 95% CI: [-101, - 6], P = 0.028) and similar blood loss than the LLR group.

Conclusions: For segment-7 liver resection, LLR is likely favorable for patients with a deep body cavity, with similar operative time and lower blood loss compared to OLR. Body-cavity depth could be a useful indicator for determining the suitable surgical approach for segment-7 liver resection.

腹部右上段体腔深度对腹腔镜下开放肝切除7节段的影响。
目的:体腔深度对7节段开放(OLR)和腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们研究了腹部右上部分体腔深度对7节段LLR和OLR的影响。方法:共纳入2010-2023年间101例接受7节段肝切除术的患者。体腔深度从腹壁表面至肝脏右侧最深部位测量。结果:在OLR组和LLR组中,浅组分别有27例和22例,深组分别有26例和26例。深度人群中OLR组的出血量明显大于相应的LLR组(差异为144 mL, 95%可信区间(CI): [50, 238], P = 0.004)。其他手术结果,包括手术时间,两组之间相似。在浅层人群中,OLR组的手术时间明显短于LLR组(差异:- 54 mL, 95% CI: [-101, - 6], P = 0.028),出血量相似。结论:对于7节段肝切除术,与OLR相比,LLR可能更适合深体腔患者,手术时间相似,出血量更少。体腔深度可作为确定7节段肝切除手术入路的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信