Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment to Address Quality Markers in Health Care: An Innovation for Prospective Hazard Analysis

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lisa T. Barker MD, MHPE (is Clinical Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, OSF HealthCare, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, and Medical Director, Jump Simulation, an OSF HealthCare and University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Collaboration.), William F. Bond MD, MS (is Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, and Director of Research, Jump Simulation.), Ann M. Willemsen-Dunlap CRNA, PhD (is Director of Education Development, Jump Simulation.), Kimberly L. Cooley MSN, RN, CCRC (is Research Education Facilitator, OSF HealthCare.), Jeremy S. McGarvey MS (is Senior Statistician, Division of Healthcare Analytics, OSF HealthCare.), Rebecca L. Ruger (is Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.), Adam Kohlrus MS, CPHQ, CPPS (is Partner and Business Designer, Do Tank, Springfield, Illinois.), Michael J. Kremer PhD, CRNA, CHSE, FAAN (is Professor and Interim Chair, Department of Adult Health and Gerontological Nursing, College of Nursing, and Co-Director, Rush Center for Clinical Skills and Simulation, Rush University.), Michelle Sergel MD (is Co-Director, Rush Center for Clinical Skills and Simulation, Rush University and Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Rush Medical College.), John A. Vozenilek MD (is Vice President and Chief Medical Officer for Innovation, OSF HealthCare. Please address correspondence to Lisa T. Barker)
{"title":"Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment to Address Quality Markers in Health Care: An Innovation for Prospective Hazard Analysis","authors":"Lisa T. Barker MD, MHPE (is Clinical Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, OSF HealthCare, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, and Medical Director, Jump Simulation, an OSF HealthCare and University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Collaboration.),&nbsp;William F. Bond MD, MS (is Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, and Director of Research, Jump Simulation.),&nbsp;Ann M. Willemsen-Dunlap CRNA, PhD (is Director of Education Development, Jump Simulation.),&nbsp;Kimberly L. Cooley MSN, RN, CCRC (is Research Education Facilitator, OSF HealthCare.),&nbsp;Jeremy S. McGarvey MS (is Senior Statistician, Division of Healthcare Analytics, OSF HealthCare.),&nbsp;Rebecca L. Ruger (is Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.),&nbsp;Adam Kohlrus MS, CPHQ, CPPS (is Partner and Business Designer, Do Tank, Springfield, Illinois.),&nbsp;Michael J. Kremer PhD, CRNA, CHSE, FAAN (is Professor and Interim Chair, Department of Adult Health and Gerontological Nursing, College of Nursing, and Co-Director, Rush Center for Clinical Skills and Simulation, Rush University.),&nbsp;Michelle Sergel MD (is Co-Director, Rush Center for Clinical Skills and Simulation, Rush University and Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Rush Medical College.),&nbsp;John A. Vozenilek MD (is Vice President and Chief Medical Officer for Innovation, OSF HealthCare. Please address correspondence to Lisa T. Barker)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment (SDENA) is a simulation-based approach to prospective hazard analysis that uses simulation and debriefing as a unit-level diagnostic tool. Scenarios address failure modes for health care improvement targets, and debriefing explores unit-specific barriers and resiliencies. Debriefing guides are structured to explore how six drivers of a behavior engineering framework (data, tools/resources, incentives, knowledge/skills, capacity, motivation) influence clinical behaviors. Illinois Hospital Association members who deployed SDENA to address specific hospital-acquired conditions found motivation to be a more significant barrier than anticipated before deployment. SDENA represents a novel approach to improving safety and may refine intervention targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 2","pages":"Pages 144-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024003015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation-Debriefing Enhanced Needs Assessment (SDENA) is a simulation-based approach to prospective hazard analysis that uses simulation and debriefing as a unit-level diagnostic tool. Scenarios address failure modes for health care improvement targets, and debriefing explores unit-specific barriers and resiliencies. Debriefing guides are structured to explore how six drivers of a behavior engineering framework (data, tools/resources, incentives, knowledge/skills, capacity, motivation) influence clinical behaviors. Illinois Hospital Association members who deployed SDENA to address specific hospital-acquired conditions found motivation to be a more significant barrier than anticipated before deployment. SDENA represents a novel approach to improving safety and may refine intervention targets.
模拟汇报增强需求评估,以解决医疗保健中的质量指标问题:前瞻性危害分析的创新。
模拟-汇报强化需求评估(SDENA)是一种基于模拟的前瞻性危害分析方法,使用模拟和汇报作为单位级诊断工具。场景解决了医疗保健改进目标的失败模式,汇报探讨了单位特定的障碍和弹性。汇报指南的结构是为了探索行为工程框架的六个驱动因素(数据、工具/资源、激励、知识/技能、能力、动机)如何影响临床行为。伊利诺斯州医院协会成员部署SDENA来解决特定的医院获得性疾病,他们发现动机是比部署前预期的更大的障碍。SDENA代表了一种提高安全性的新方法,可以完善干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信