Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Owen P Leary, Aayush Setty, Jung Ho Gong, Rohaid Ali, Jared S Fridley, Charles G Fisher, Arjun Sahgal, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Áron Lazáry, Ilya Laufer, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Chetan Bettegowda, Stefano Boriani, Addisu Mesfin, Alessandro Luzzati, John H Shin, Riccardo Cecchinato, Francis J Hornicek, Matthew L Goodwin, Ziya L Gokaslan
{"title":"Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm.","authors":"Owen P Leary, Aayush Setty, Jung Ho Gong, Rohaid Ali, Jared S Fridley, Charles G Fisher, Arjun Sahgal, Laurence D Rhines, Jeremy J Reynolds, Áron Lazáry, Ilya Laufer, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Nicolas Dea, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Chetan Bettegowda, Stefano Boriani, Addisu Mesfin, Alessandro Luzzati, John H Shin, Riccardo Cecchinato, Francis J Hornicek, Matthew L Goodwin, Ziya L Gokaslan","doi":"10.1177/21925682241237486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative Review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Contextualized by a narrative review of recent literature, we propose a wound complication prevention and management algorithm for spinal oncology patients. We highlight available strategies and motivate future research to identify optimal and individualized wound management for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a search of recent studies (2010-2022) using relevant keywords to identify primary literature in support of current strategies for wound complication prevention and management following spine tumor surgery. When primary literature specific to spine tumor cases was not available, data were extrapolated from studies of other spine surgery populations. Results were compiled into a proposed clinical algorithm to guide practice considering available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on available literature, we recommend individualized stratification of patients according to identifiable risk factors for wound complication and propose several interventions which might be employed preventatively, including intrawound antibiotic administration, negative pressure wound therapy, and primary flap closure of the surgical wound. Of these, the available evidence, weighing possible risks vs benefits, most strongly favors primary flap closure of surgical wounds, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors. A secondary algorithm to guide management of wound complications is also proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wound complications such as SSI and dehiscence remain a significant source of morbidity following spine tumor surgery. Triaging patients on an individualized basis according to risk factors for complication may aid in selecting appropriate prophylactic strategies to prevent these complications. Future research in this area is still needed to strengthen recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"15 1_suppl","pages":"143S-156S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241237486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Narrative Review.

Objective: Contextualized by a narrative review of recent literature, we propose a wound complication prevention and management algorithm for spinal oncology patients. We highlight available strategies and motivate future research to identify optimal and individualized wound management for this population.

Methods: We conducted a search of recent studies (2010-2022) using relevant keywords to identify primary literature in support of current strategies for wound complication prevention and management following spine tumor surgery. When primary literature specific to spine tumor cases was not available, data were extrapolated from studies of other spine surgery populations. Results were compiled into a proposed clinical algorithm to guide practice considering available evidence.

Results: Based on available literature, we recommend individualized stratification of patients according to identifiable risk factors for wound complication and propose several interventions which might be employed preventatively, including intrawound antibiotic administration, negative pressure wound therapy, and primary flap closure of the surgical wound. Of these, the available evidence, weighing possible risks vs benefits, most strongly favors primary flap closure of surgical wounds, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors. A secondary algorithm to guide management of wound complications is also proposed.

Conclusions: Wound complications such as SSI and dehiscence remain a significant source of morbidity following spine tumor surgery. Triaging patients on an individualized basis according to risk factors for complication may aid in selecting appropriate prophylactic strategies to prevent these complications. Future research in this area is still needed to strengthen recommendations.

肿瘤脊柱手术后伤口并发症的预防和处理:现有证据的叙述性回顾和拟议的临床决策算法。
研究设计:叙述性回顾。目的:通过对近期文献的叙述性回顾,我们提出了一种脊柱肿瘤患者伤口并发症的预防和管理算法。我们强调可用的策略,并激励未来的研究,以确定最佳和个性化的伤口管理为这一人群。方法:我们使用相关关键词检索近期研究(2010-2022),以确定支持当前脊柱肿瘤手术后伤口并发症预防和处理策略的主要文献。当没有脊柱肿瘤病例的主要文献时,从其他脊柱手术人群的研究中推断数据。结果汇编成一个拟议的临床算法,以指导实践考虑到现有的证据。结果:基于现有文献,我们建议根据可识别的伤口并发症危险因素对患者进行个体化分层,并提出几种可能采用的预防措施,包括伤口内抗生素施用、负压伤口治疗和手术伤口的初级皮瓣关闭。其中,现有的证据,权衡可能的风险与收益,最强烈地支持外科伤口的初级皮瓣关闭,特别是对于有多种危险因素的患者。并提出了一种指导伤口并发症处理的二级算法。结论:伤口并发症如SSI和裂开仍然是脊柱肿瘤手术后发病率的重要来源。根据并发症的危险因素对患者进行个体化分诊,有助于选择适当的预防策略来预防这些并发症。今后在这方面的研究仍需加强建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信