Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Riddhi Doshi, Victoria Divino, Luke Greenwalt, Mitchell DeKoven
{"title":"Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation.","authors":"Riddhi Doshi, Victoria Divino, Luke Greenwalt, Mitchell DeKoven","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is expected to result in lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (US). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the most recent draft guidance for the medicare drug price negotiation (DPN) program in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In August 2023, the list of 10 drugs selected for the DPN were published and the first round of negotiations are now complete. While the latest CMS guidance highlights the importance of considering study limitations, bias, uncertainty, and generalizability, there were scarce methodological guidelines provided for the comparative effectiveness research studies. We conducted searches on PubMed and reviewed resources from websites of regulatory authorities.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Broader domains of data quality, transparency, and methodology including study design, outcomes assessment, bias, confounding and uncertainty should be considered when developing methodological guidelines for evidence submitted for DPN. There is opportunity to align with and leverage existing guidelines published by federal and non-federal organizations in the US and globally while customizing the new guidance based on the specific requirements of DPN, keeping in mind CMS's interest in specific populations as well as health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"451-457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is expected to result in lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (US). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the most recent draft guidance for the medicare drug price negotiation (DPN) program in May 2024.

Areas covered: In August 2023, the list of 10 drugs selected for the DPN were published and the first round of negotiations are now complete. While the latest CMS guidance highlights the importance of considering study limitations, bias, uncertainty, and generalizability, there were scarce methodological guidelines provided for the comparative effectiveness research studies. We conducted searches on PubMed and reviewed resources from websites of regulatory authorities.

Expert opinion: Broader domains of data quality, transparency, and methodology including study design, outcomes assessment, bias, confounding and uncertainty should be considered when developing methodological guidelines for evidence submitted for DPN. There is opportunity to align with and leverage existing guidelines published by federal and non-federal organizations in the US and globally while customizing the new guidance based on the specific requirements of DPN, keeping in mind CMS's interest in specific populations as well as health equity.

比较有效性研究的方法标准:对医疗保险药品价格谈判证据审查的考虑。
导读:2022年通货膨胀减少法案(IRA)预计将导致美国医疗保险受益人的药品价格降低。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于2024年5月发布了医疗保险药品价格谈判(DPN)计划的最新指导草案。涵盖领域:2023年8月,公布了为DPN选定的10种药物清单,第一轮谈判现已完成。虽然最新的CMS指南强调了考虑研究局限性、偏倚、不确定性和概括性的重要性,但为比较有效性研究(CER)提供的方法指南却很少。我们在PubMed上进行了搜索,并从监管机构的网站上查阅了资源。专家意见:在为DPN提交的证据制定方法学指南时,应考虑更广泛的数据质量、透明度和方法学领域,包括研究设计、结果评估、偏倚、混淆和不确定性。有机会与美国和全球联邦和非联邦组织发布的现有指南保持一致并加以利用,同时根据DPN的具体要求定制新指南,同时牢记CMS对特定人群的兴趣以及健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信