Yangyang Xu, Da Lu, Le Zhang, Shijia Zhang, Yong Wu, Heng Li, Baoqing Pei, Xueqing Wu
{"title":"A Novel Dynamic Growth Rod Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities","authors":"Yangyang Xu, Da Lu, Le Zhang, Shijia Zhang, Yong Wu, Heng Li, Baoqing Pei, Xueqing Wu","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Growth rods are the gold standard for treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, current treatments with growth rods do not optimize spinal growth in EOS patients, and frequent distraction surgeries significantly increase complications, imposing considerable economic and psychological burdens on patients. An improved growth rod is urgently required to address the need for dynamic growth and external regulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study designed a novel growth rod (NGR) with unidirectional sliding and external regulation capabilities. By establishing a three-dimensional model of the EOS spine, we simulated the implantation of traditional growth rods (TGR) and NGR. We applied a compressive load of 400 N to test axial stiffness and a moment of 1 NM to assess bending stiffness under six different conditions. Additionally, we evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the spinal joints, and the distribution of Von Mises stress in vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and the growth rods, and calculated the axial force, moment, fatigue life, and strain energy of the device.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>NGR exhibits higher axial compression and torsional stiffness than TGR and the Intact group. Additionally, Von Mises stress values for NGR are higher than those for TGR across all operating conditions, albeit with slightly lower total strain energy than TGR. Although Von Mises stress in NGR concentrates near the screw fixation, the fatigue life remains adequate for basic living requirements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, NGR demonstrates superior stiffness and stress distribution. NGR's distraction-based implant features a unidirectional sliding component with a spring-driven mechanism for dynamic correction and a novel non-invasive extension mechanism to reduce infections. Compared to leading EOS implants, NGR offers improved stability, showing promise for enhancing EOS surgical interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Growth rods are the gold standard for treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, current treatments with growth rods do not optimize spinal growth in EOS patients, and frequent distraction surgeries significantly increase complications, imposing considerable economic and psychological burdens on patients. An improved growth rod is urgently required to address the need for dynamic growth and external regulation.
Methods
This study designed a novel growth rod (NGR) with unidirectional sliding and external regulation capabilities. By establishing a three-dimensional model of the EOS spine, we simulated the implantation of traditional growth rods (TGR) and NGR. We applied a compressive load of 400 N to test axial stiffness and a moment of 1 NM to assess bending stiffness under six different conditions. Additionally, we evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the spinal joints, and the distribution of Von Mises stress in vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and the growth rods, and calculated the axial force, moment, fatigue life, and strain energy of the device.
Results
NGR exhibits higher axial compression and torsional stiffness than TGR and the Intact group. Additionally, Von Mises stress values for NGR are higher than those for TGR across all operating conditions, albeit with slightly lower total strain energy than TGR. Although Von Mises stress in NGR concentrates near the screw fixation, the fatigue life remains adequate for basic living requirements.
Conclusion
Overall, NGR demonstrates superior stiffness and stress distribution. NGR's distraction-based implant features a unidirectional sliding component with a spring-driven mechanism for dynamic correction and a novel non-invasive extension mechanism to reduce infections. Compared to leading EOS implants, NGR offers improved stability, showing promise for enhancing EOS surgical interventions.
背景:生长棒是治疗早发脊柱侧凸(EOS)的金标准。然而,目前使用生长棒的治疗方法并不能优化 EOS 患者的脊柱生长,频繁的牵引手术大大增加了并发症,给患者造成了相当大的经济和心理负担。目前迫切需要一种改进的生长棒,以满足动态生长和外部调节的需要:本研究设计了一种具有单向滑动和外部调节功能的新型生长棒(NGR)。通过建立 EOS 脊柱的三维模型,我们模拟了传统生长棒(TGR)和 NGR 的植入过程。我们施加了 400 N 的压缩载荷来测试轴向刚度,并施加了 1 NM 的力矩来评估六种不同条件下的弯曲刚度。此外,我们还评估了脊柱关节的运动范围(ROM),以及椎骨、椎间盘和生长棒的 Von Mises 应力分布,并计算了该装置的轴向力、力矩、疲劳寿命和应变能:结果:NGR 比 TGR 和完好组显示出更高的轴向压缩和扭转刚度。此外,在所有工作条件下,NGR 的 Von Mises 应力值均高于 TGR,尽管总应变能略低于 TGR。虽然 NGR 的 Von Mises 应力集中在螺钉固定处附近,但其疲劳寿命仍足以满足基本生活要求:总的来说,NGR 在刚度和应力分布方面都表现出众。NGR 的牵张型植入物具有单向滑动组件,弹簧驱动机制可实现动态校正,新颖的非侵入式伸展机制可减少感染。与主要的 EOS 植入体相比,NGR 具有更高的稳定性,有望加强 EOS 手术干预。