Growing up without violence (GWV): Study protocol for a cluster randomised trial and process evaluation of a school-based intervention preventing adolescent sexual exploitation in Brazil

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ligia Kiss , Agnese Iuliano , Ana Paula Portella , Heloína Paiva , Malini Pires , Baptiste Leurent
{"title":"Growing up without violence (GWV): Study protocol for a cluster randomised trial and process evaluation of a school-based intervention preventing adolescent sexual exploitation in Brazil","authors":"Ligia Kiss ,&nbsp;Agnese Iuliano ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Portella ,&nbsp;Heloína Paiva ,&nbsp;Malini Pires ,&nbsp;Baptiste Leurent","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sexual exploitation of children and adolescents (SECA) is a mostly invisible phenomenon, having negative impacts on adolescents' health and well-being. There is increasing awarenessof preventative strategies to reduce sexual exploitation of children and adolescents, but limited evidence on their effectiveness and mechanisms. This project addresses this gap through the impact and process evaluation of ‘Growing Up Without Violence’ (GWV), the largest intervention in Brazil tackling SECA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will conduct a two-arm cluster randomised trial (CRT) with parallel assignment in the municipalities of Cabo de Santo Agostinho and Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in Brazil. We will randomly allocate 30 schools to intervention and 30 to wait-list control arms. In each of these schools, we will randomly select independent samples of fifty students (aged 12 to 17) to participate in baseline and endline surveys. We will invite students to self-complete pre-programmed questionnaires in a private school space, under the supervision of trained researchers. Our main analysis is a cross-sectional comparison between control and intervention schools of students' levels of basic knowledge for identifying appropriate and inappropriate sexual advances and acts (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include knowledge of risks of online sexual exploitation, willingness to report incidents of sexual abuse and exploitation, and recall of exposure SECA preventive training content.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale rigorous evaluation of an intervention to prevent SECA in Brazil. Findings will inform our strategies and future interventions to prevent SECA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 107802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sexual exploitation of children and adolescents (SECA) is a mostly invisible phenomenon, having negative impacts on adolescents' health and well-being. There is increasing awarenessof preventative strategies to reduce sexual exploitation of children and adolescents, but limited evidence on their effectiveness and mechanisms. This project addresses this gap through the impact and process evaluation of ‘Growing Up Without Violence’ (GWV), the largest intervention in Brazil tackling SECA.

Methods

We will conduct a two-arm cluster randomised trial (CRT) with parallel assignment in the municipalities of Cabo de Santo Agostinho and Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in Brazil. We will randomly allocate 30 schools to intervention and 30 to wait-list control arms. In each of these schools, we will randomly select independent samples of fifty students (aged 12 to 17) to participate in baseline and endline surveys. We will invite students to self-complete pre-programmed questionnaires in a private school space, under the supervision of trained researchers. Our main analysis is a cross-sectional comparison between control and intervention schools of students' levels of basic knowledge for identifying appropriate and inappropriate sexual advances and acts (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include knowledge of risks of online sexual exploitation, willingness to report incidents of sexual abuse and exploitation, and recall of exposure SECA preventive training content.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale rigorous evaluation of an intervention to prevent SECA in Brazil. Findings will inform our strategies and future interventions to prevent SECA.
成长过程中没有暴力(GWV):巴西一项以学校为基础的预防青少年性剥削的干预措施的集群随机试验和过程评估研究方案。
背景:对儿童和青少年的性剥削(SECA)是一种大多看不见的现象,对青少年的健康和福祉产生负面影响。人们日益认识到减少对儿童和青少年进行性剥削的预防性战略,但关于其有效性和机制的证据有限。该项目通过“无暴力成长”(GWV)的影响和过程评估来解决这一差距,GWV是巴西应对SECA的最大干预措施。方法:我们将在巴西的Cabo de Santo Agostinho市和jaboat o dos Guararapes市进行平行分配的双组随机试验(CRT)。我们将随机分配30所学校进行干预,30所学校进行轮候控制。在这些学校中,我们将随机选择70名学生(12至17岁)的独立样本参加基线和终点调查。我们将邀请学生在训练有素的研究人员的监督下,在私立学校空间自行完成预编程问卷。我们的主要分析是对照学校和干预学校之间学生识别适当和不适当的性行为和行为的基本知识水平的横断面比较(主要结果)。次要结果包括对网络性剥削风险的了解,报告性侵犯和性剥削事件的意愿,以及对暴露的SECA预防性培训内容的回忆。讨论:据我们所知,这是巴西首次对预防SECA的干预措施进行大规模严格评估。研究结果将为我们预防SECA的战略和未来干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信