Monica Roberts, Ru Dee Chung, Malcolm Forbes, Anthony Hew, Ar Kar Aung, Matthew Kang
{"title":"Understanding influences on psychiatry specialty selection in Victoria's Medical workforce.","authors":"Monica Roberts, Ru Dee Chung, Malcolm Forbes, Anthony Hew, Ar Kar Aung, Matthew Kang","doi":"10.1177/10398562251313685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAustralia faces a psychiatrist shortage, making it crucial to understand factors influencing specialty choice and workforce retention.MethodAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical doctors in their prevocational and vocational stages working in Victoria, Australia. Participants were asked about various factors that influenced their choice of specialty. This study focused on those interested in or currently training in psychiatry. To explore differences in factors influencing specialty choice, prevocational doctors interested in psychiatry were compared to those undecided about their specialty.ResultsOf the 107 respondents, 56 expressed interest in or were training in psychiatry. The top five factors influencing psychiatry specialty choice were perceived ability, specialty culture, prior experience, work-life balance, and patient interactions. Both prevocational and vocational doctors shared similar views on these factors. Factors such as the cost of training, influence of family and friends, prestige, length of the training program, and salary were reported as less influential.ConclusionsThis study identified several factors that were important to junior doctors when selecting psychiatry as a specialty. Active consideration of these factors within service and training frameworks may facilitate improved junior doctor wellbeing and greater workforce retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"567-572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251313685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveAustralia faces a psychiatrist shortage, making it crucial to understand factors influencing specialty choice and workforce retention.MethodAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical doctors in their prevocational and vocational stages working in Victoria, Australia. Participants were asked about various factors that influenced their choice of specialty. This study focused on those interested in or currently training in psychiatry. To explore differences in factors influencing specialty choice, prevocational doctors interested in psychiatry were compared to those undecided about their specialty.ResultsOf the 107 respondents, 56 expressed interest in or were training in psychiatry. The top five factors influencing psychiatry specialty choice were perceived ability, specialty culture, prior experience, work-life balance, and patient interactions. Both prevocational and vocational doctors shared similar views on these factors. Factors such as the cost of training, influence of family and friends, prestige, length of the training program, and salary were reported as less influential.ConclusionsThis study identified several factors that were important to junior doctors when selecting psychiatry as a specialty. Active consideration of these factors within service and training frameworks may facilitate improved junior doctor wellbeing and greater workforce retention.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.