Performance of individual criteria of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) intraabdominal injury prediction rule.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Cosby G Arnold, Paul Ishimine, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Kenneth Yen, Nisa Atigapramoj, Mohamed Badawy, Irma T Ugalde, Pradip P Chaudhari, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes
{"title":"Performance of individual criteria of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) intraabdominal injury prediction rule.","authors":"Cosby G Arnold, Paul Ishimine, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Kenneth Yen, Nisa Atigapramoj, Mohamed Badawy, Irma T Ugalde, Pradip P Chaudhari, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes","doi":"10.1111/acem.15084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) derived and externally validated a clinical prediction rule to identify children with blunt torso trauma at low risk for intraabdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention (IAI<sup>AI</sup>). Little is known about the risk for IAI<sup>AI</sup> when only one or two prediction rule variables are positive. We sought to determine the risk for IAI<sup>AI</sup> when either one or two PECARN intraabdominal injury rule variables are positive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a planned secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that included 7542 children (<18 years old) with blunt torso trauma evaluated in six emergency departments from December 2016 to August 2021. Patients with only one or two PECARN rule variables positive were included. The outcome was IAI<sup>AI</sup> (IAI undergoing therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolization, blood transfusion, or two or more nights of intravenous fluids).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 7542 children enrolled, 2986 (39.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.5%-40.7%) had one or two PECARN variables positive and were included. Of this subpopulation, 227 (7.6%, 95% CI 6.7%-8.6%) had intraabdominal injuries. In the 1639 patients with only one rule variable positive, 21 (1.3%, 95% CI 0.8%-2.0%) had IAI<sup>AI</sup>. In the 1347 patients with two rule variables positive, 27 (2.0%, 95% CI 1.3%-2.9%) had IAI<sup>AI</sup>. Risk for IAI<sup>AI</sup> for each variable was highest for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <14 (16/291, 5.5%, 95% CI 3.2%-8.8%) and abdominal wall trauma (three of 321, 0.9%, 95% CI 0.2%-2.7%). Risk for IAI<sup>AI</sup> when two variables were present was highest when decreased breath sounds (three of 44, 6.8%, 95% CI 1.4%-18.7%) and GCS <14 (10/207, 4.8%, 95% CI 2.3%-8.7%) were present with one other variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few children with blunt torso trauma and one or two PECARN predictor variables present have IAI<sup>AI</sup>. Those with GCS score <14, however, are at highest risk for IAI<sup>AI</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) derived and externally validated a clinical prediction rule to identify children with blunt torso trauma at low risk for intraabdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention (IAIAI). Little is known about the risk for IAIAI when only one or two prediction rule variables are positive. We sought to determine the risk for IAIAI when either one or two PECARN intraabdominal injury rule variables are positive.

Methods: We performed a planned secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that included 7542 children (<18 years old) with blunt torso trauma evaluated in six emergency departments from December 2016 to August 2021. Patients with only one or two PECARN rule variables positive were included. The outcome was IAIAI (IAI undergoing therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolization, blood transfusion, or two or more nights of intravenous fluids).

Results: Among the 7542 children enrolled, 2986 (39.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.5%-40.7%) had one or two PECARN variables positive and were included. Of this subpopulation, 227 (7.6%, 95% CI 6.7%-8.6%) had intraabdominal injuries. In the 1639 patients with only one rule variable positive, 21 (1.3%, 95% CI 0.8%-2.0%) had IAIAI. In the 1347 patients with two rule variables positive, 27 (2.0%, 95% CI 1.3%-2.9%) had IAIAI. Risk for IAIAI for each variable was highest for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <14 (16/291, 5.5%, 95% CI 3.2%-8.8%) and abdominal wall trauma (three of 321, 0.9%, 95% CI 0.2%-2.7%). Risk for IAIAI when two variables were present was highest when decreased breath sounds (three of 44, 6.8%, 95% CI 1.4%-18.7%) and GCS <14 (10/207, 4.8%, 95% CI 2.3%-8.7%) were present with one other variable.

Conclusions: Few children with blunt torso trauma and one or two PECARN predictor variables present have IAIAI. Those with GCS score <14, however, are at highest risk for IAIAI.

儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)腹内损伤预测规则的个别标准的表现。
目的:儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)推导并外部验证了一种临床预测规则,用于识别钝性躯干创伤儿童进行急性干预(IAIAI)时低风险的腹内损伤。当只有一两个预测规则变量为正时,对IAIAI的风险知之甚少。当一个或两个PECARN腹内损伤规则变量为阳性时,我们试图确定IAIAI的风险。方法:我们对一项前瞻性多中心研究进行了计划的二次分析,该研究包括7542名儿童(接受治疗性剖腹手术、血管造影栓塞、输血或两晚或两晚以上静脉输液的儿童)。结果:在入组的7542名儿童中,有2986名(39.6%,95%可信区间[CI] 38.5%-40.7%)有1个或2个PECARN变量阳性并被纳入。在这一亚群中,227人(7.6%,95% CI 6.7%-8.6%)有腹内损伤。在仅有一项规则变量阳性的1639例患者中,21例(1.3%,95% CI 0.8%-2.0%)患有IAIAI。在两项规则变量均为阳性的1347例患者中,27例(2.0%,95% CI 1.3%-2.9%)患有IAIAI。当两个变量存在时,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分AI的每个变量发生IAIAI的风险最高,当呼吸音减少时风险最高(44个变量中的3个,6.8%,95% CI 1.4%-18.7%)和GCS结论:很少有钝性躯干创伤和一个或两个PECARN预测变量存在的儿童发生IAIAI。GCS评分为AI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信