[Analysis of risk factors of diaphragmatic hernia after thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].

Z H Li, W L Ding, K L Lyu, B K Sun, K Q Dong, M B Wang, P Su, Z Z Tian
{"title":"[Analysis of risk factors of diaphragmatic hernia after thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].","authors":"Z H Li, W L Ding, K L Lyu, B K Sun, K Q Dong, M B Wang, P Su, Z Z Tian","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240805-00364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the related risk factors of diaphragmatic hernia after thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy (MIME). <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective controlled study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent MIME at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, from January 2016 to December 2023. A total of 619 patients were included. There were 423 males and 196 females, aged (63.7±7.6) years (range: 37 to 87 years). The diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia after MIME was made based on clinical symptoms and CT scans. Patients were divided into two groups: the diaphragmatic hernia group (<i>n</i>=16) and the non-diaphragmatic hernia group (<i>n</i>=603). Clinical data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, tumor location (upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus), preoperative neoadjuvant therapy history, and tumor staging, were collected and analyzed. A BMI of 25 kg/m² and age of 65 years were used as cutoff values. The <i>χ</i>² test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the data between the two groups, and Logistic regression was employed for risk factor analysis. The diaphragmatic hernia group and non-diaphragmatic hernia group were matched in a 1∶3 ratio with a caliper value of 0.02 by propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and compared using the log-rank test for between-group differences. <b>Results:</b> The proportion of patients with diaphragmatic hernia after MIME who underwent surgical treatment was 6/16. Statistically significant differences were observed between the diaphragmatic hernia group and the non-diaphragmatic hernia group in terms of age (<i>χ</i>²=16.057, <i>P</i><0.01), BMI (<i>χ</i>²=16.057, <i>P</i><0.01), and tumor location (<i>χ</i>²=12.048, <i>P</i>=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥65 years (<i>OR</i>=1.236, <i>P</i>=0.023) and BMI<25 kg/m² (<i>OR</i>=0.810, <i>P</i><0.01) were independent risk factors for the development of diaphragmatic hernia after MIME. Survival analysis showed no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with and without diaphragmatic hernia after MIME (<i>P</i>=0.187), and whether patients with diaphragmatic hernia underwent surgery was not associated with long-term prognosis (<i>P</i>=0.560). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients with BMI<25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and age ≥65 years are independent risk factors for diaphragmatic hernia after MIME. The occurrence of diaphragmatic hernia is not associated with prognosis, and whether patients with diaphragmatic hernia undergo surgery does not affect the prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":60685,"journal":{"name":"中华外科杂志","volume":"63 2","pages":"130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240805-00364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the related risk factors of diaphragmatic hernia after thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy (MIME). Methods: This is a retrospective controlled study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent MIME at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, from January 2016 to December 2023. A total of 619 patients were included. There were 423 males and 196 females, aged (63.7±7.6) years (range: 37 to 87 years). The diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia after MIME was made based on clinical symptoms and CT scans. Patients were divided into two groups: the diaphragmatic hernia group (n=16) and the non-diaphragmatic hernia group (n=603). Clinical data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, tumor location (upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus), preoperative neoadjuvant therapy history, and tumor staging, were collected and analyzed. A BMI of 25 kg/m² and age of 65 years were used as cutoff values. The χ² test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the data between the two groups, and Logistic regression was employed for risk factor analysis. The diaphragmatic hernia group and non-diaphragmatic hernia group were matched in a 1∶3 ratio with a caliper value of 0.02 by propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and compared using the log-rank test for between-group differences. Results: The proportion of patients with diaphragmatic hernia after MIME who underwent surgical treatment was 6/16. Statistically significant differences were observed between the diaphragmatic hernia group and the non-diaphragmatic hernia group in terms of age (χ²=16.057, P<0.01), BMI (χ²=16.057, P<0.01), and tumor location (χ²=12.048, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥65 years (OR=1.236, P=0.023) and BMI<25 kg/m² (OR=0.810, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for the development of diaphragmatic hernia after MIME. Survival analysis showed no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with and without diaphragmatic hernia after MIME (P=0.187), and whether patients with diaphragmatic hernia underwent surgery was not associated with long-term prognosis (P=0.560). Conclusion: Patients with BMI<25 kg/m2 and age ≥65 years are independent risk factors for diaphragmatic hernia after MIME. The occurrence of diaphragmatic hernia is not associated with prognosis, and whether patients with diaphragmatic hernia undergo surgery does not affect the prognosis.

【胸腹腔镜微创McKeown食管切除术后膈疝危险因素分析】。
目的:探讨胸腹腔镜微创Mckeown食管切除术(MIME)后膈疝的相关危险因素。方法:回顾性对照研究。回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年12月在河北医科大学第四医院胸外科行MIME手术患者的临床资料。共纳入619例患者。男性423人,女性196人,年龄(63.7±7.6)岁,年龄范围:37 ~ 87岁。根据临床症状和CT扫描对MIME术后膈疝进行诊断。患者分为膈疝组(n=16)和非膈疝组(n=603)。收集并分析临床资料,包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟史、肿瘤位置(上、中、下胸食道)、术前新辅助治疗史、肿瘤分期。BMI为25 kg/m²,年龄为65岁作为临界值。两组数据比较采用χ 2检验和Fisher精确检验,危险因素分析采用Logistic回归。采用倾向评分匹配法,将膈疝组与非膈疝组按1∶3的比例匹配,卡尺值为0.02。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法,组间差异采用log-rank检验。结果:MIME术后膈疝患者接受手术治疗的比例为6/16。膈疝组与非膈疝组的年龄差异有统计学意义(χ²=16.057,Pχ²=16.057,Pχ²=12.048,P=0.002)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄≥65岁(OR=1.236, P=0.023), BMIOR=0.810, PP=0.187),膈疝患者是否接受手术与远期预后无相关性(P=0.560)。结论:BMI2和年龄≥65岁是MIME术后膈疝的独立危险因素。膈疝的发生与预后无关,膈疝患者是否接受手术治疗不影响预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20861
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg (monthly) is a high-level medical science and technology journal approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, and organised by the Chinese Medical Association for domestic and international public circulation. It was founded in January 1951, and is published on the basis of the Journal of Chinese Surgery. The Journal is aimed at senior and intermediate surgeons and related researchers, mainly reporting the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of surgery, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding effect on the clinical work of surgery. Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg is committed to reflecting the major research progress in the field of surgery in China and promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad. The main columns include thesis, meta-analysis, review, expert forum, synthesis, case report, diagnosis and treatment experience, technical exchange, clinical case discussion, academic controversy, and special lectures, etc. The journal has been accepted by the National Academy of Medicine of the United States. The journal has been included in many famous databases at home and abroad, such as the Biomedical Analysis and Online Retrieval System (MEDLINE) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信