Multicenter In-House Evaluation of an Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre, Alessandra Rappa, Dina Ruano, Demi van Egmond, Sandra Gallach, Dilce Gozuyasli, Cecília Durães, José Luis Costa, Carlos Camps, Ludovic Lacroix, Karl Kashofer, Tom van Wezel, Massimo Barberis
{"title":"Multicenter In-House Evaluation of an Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.","authors":"Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre, Alessandra Rappa, Dina Ruano, Demi van Egmond, Sandra Gallach, Dilce Gozuyasli, Cecília Durães, José Luis Costa, Carlos Camps, Ludovic Lacroix, Karl Kashofer, Tom van Wezel, Massimo Barberis","doi":"10.1007/s40291-024-00766-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting response to targeted cancer therapies increasingly relies on both simple and complex genetic biomarkers. Comprehensive genomic profiling using high-throughput assays must be evaluated for reproducibility and accuracy compared with existing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a multicenter evaluation of the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus) Pan-Cancer Research Panel for comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors. A series of 193 research samples (125 DNA and 68 RNA samples) was analyzed to evaluate the correlation and concordance of the OCA Plus panel with orthogonal methods, as well as its reproducibility (n = 5 DNA samples) across laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate for DNA and RNA sequencing was 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively. In a single workflow, the OCA Plus panel provided a detailed genomic profile with a high success rate for all biomarkers tested: single nucleotide variants/indels, copy number variants, and fusions, as well as complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and homologous recombination deficiency. The concordance for single nucleotide variants/indels was 94.8%, for copy number variants 96.5%, for fusions 94.2%, for microsatellite instability 80.8%, for tumor mutational burden 81.3%, and for homologous recombination deficiency 100%. The results showed high reproducibility across the five European research centers, each analyzing shared pre-characterized tissue biopsies (average of 1890 single nucleotide variants/indels per sample).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter evaluation of the OCA Plus panel confirms the results of previous single-center studies and demonstrates the high reproducibility and accuracy of this assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":49797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00766-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting response to targeted cancer therapies increasingly relies on both simple and complex genetic biomarkers. Comprehensive genomic profiling using high-throughput assays must be evaluated for reproducibility and accuracy compared with existing methods.

Methods: This study is a multicenter evaluation of the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus) Pan-Cancer Research Panel for comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors. A series of 193 research samples (125 DNA and 68 RNA samples) was analyzed to evaluate the correlation and concordance of the OCA Plus panel with orthogonal methods, as well as its reproducibility (n = 5 DNA samples) across laboratories.

Results: The success rate for DNA and RNA sequencing was 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively. In a single workflow, the OCA Plus panel provided a detailed genomic profile with a high success rate for all biomarkers tested: single nucleotide variants/indels, copy number variants, and fusions, as well as complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and homologous recombination deficiency. The concordance for single nucleotide variants/indels was 94.8%, for copy number variants 96.5%, for fusions 94.2%, for microsatellite instability 80.8%, for tumor mutational burden 81.3%, and for homologous recombination deficiency 100%. The results showed high reproducibility across the five European research centers, each analyzing shared pre-characterized tissue biopsies (average of 1890 single nucleotide variants/indels per sample).

Conclusions: This multicenter evaluation of the OCA Plus panel confirms the results of previous single-center studies and demonstrates the high reproducibility and accuracy of this assay.

基于扩增子的下一代综合分子分析测序面板的多中心内部评估。
背景:预测对靶向癌症治疗的反应越来越依赖于简单和复杂的遗传生物标志物。与现有方法相比,必须评估使用高通量分析的全面基因组图谱的可重复性和准确性。方法:本研究是对Oncomine™Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus)泛癌症研究小组进行的一项多中心评估,用于实体肿瘤的全面基因组分析。通过对193个研究样本(125个DNA样本和68个RNA样本)进行正交分析,评价了OCA Plus面板的相关性和一致性,以及其在实验室间的可重复性(n = 5个DNA样本)。结果:DNA和RNA测序成功率分别为96.6%和89.7%。在一个工作流程中,OCA Plus面板提供了详细的基因组图谱,对所有生物标记物进行了高成功率测试:单核苷酸变异/索引、拷贝数变异和融合,以及复杂的生物标记物,如微卫星不稳定性、肿瘤突变负担和同源重组缺陷。单核苷酸变异/索引的一致性为94.8%,拷贝数变异的一致性为96.5%,融合体的一致性为94.2%,微卫星不稳定性的一致性为80.8%,肿瘤突变负担的一致性为81.3%,同源重组缺陷的一致性为100%。结果显示,在五个欧洲研究中心中,每个研究中心都分析了共享的预表征组织活检(每个样本平均有1890个单核苷酸变异/索引),具有很高的可重复性。结论:OCA Plus小组的多中心评估证实了先前单中心研究的结果,并证明了该分析的高重复性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy welcomes current opinion articles on emerging or contentious issues, comprehensive narrative reviews, systematic reviews (as outlined by the PRISMA statement), original research articles (including short communications) and letters to the editor. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信