Associations Between Peak Expiratory Flow and Community Mobility Loss Among Older Adults in the United States.

Lindsey M Mathis, Na Sun, Simon K Ho, Lane S White, Odessa Addison, Douglas N Savin, Jason R Falvey
{"title":"Associations Between Peak Expiratory Flow and Community Mobility Loss Among Older Adults in the United States.","authors":"Lindsey M Mathis, Na Sun, Simon K Ho, Lane S White, Odessa Addison, Douglas N Savin, Jason R Falvey","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community mobility is a vital patient-centered outcome for older adults living in the community. These deficits in mobility are linked to social isolation, increased hospitalizations, and higher mortality rates. Impaired pulmonary function may be a modifiable risk factor for mobility decline, with existing inequities in lung health potentially contributing disproportionately to mobility loss among Black older adults.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>A cohort of 4742 community-dwelling older adults (weighted n = 29,180,893) with self-reported ability to walk 3 or more blocks in their community was drawn from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Pulmonary function was measured by PEF in NHATS. Community mobility loss was defined as self-reported inability to walk ≥ 3 blocks in the 1-year follow-up assessment. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used and adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, pain, and assistive device use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 73.7% of the sample had normal PEF, 18.6% had moderate impairment, and 7.7% had severe impairment. Those with severe impairment were more likely to be male and identify as Black. In unadjusted analyses, 8.8% of older adults with normal PEF experienced mobility loss, compared with 12.7% of those with moderate impairment, and 19.7% with severe impairment. Odds of mobility loss were 111% higher for those with severe PEF impairment as compared to those with normal PEF (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7) in fully adjusted models, with weaker relationships being observed for those with moderately impaired PEF (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly 8%, or an estimated 1 million community-ambulating U.S. older adults, had severe impairments in peak expiratory flow in 2015; these older adults have a substantially higher risk of losing the ability to ambulate community distances over the subsequent year.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community mobility is a vital patient-centered outcome for older adults living in the community. These deficits in mobility are linked to social isolation, increased hospitalizations, and higher mortality rates. Impaired pulmonary function may be a modifiable risk factor for mobility decline, with existing inequities in lung health potentially contributing disproportionately to mobility loss among Black older adults.

Materials/methods: A cohort of 4742 community-dwelling older adults (weighted n = 29,180,893) with self-reported ability to walk 3 or more blocks in their community was drawn from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Pulmonary function was measured by PEF in NHATS. Community mobility loss was defined as self-reported inability to walk ≥ 3 blocks in the 1-year follow-up assessment. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used and adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, pain, and assistive device use.

Results: Overall, 73.7% of the sample had normal PEF, 18.6% had moderate impairment, and 7.7% had severe impairment. Those with severe impairment were more likely to be male and identify as Black. In unadjusted analyses, 8.8% of older adults with normal PEF experienced mobility loss, compared with 12.7% of those with moderate impairment, and 19.7% with severe impairment. Odds of mobility loss were 111% higher for those with severe PEF impairment as compared to those with normal PEF (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7) in fully adjusted models, with weaker relationships being observed for those with moderately impaired PEF (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8).

Conclusions: Nearly 8%, or an estimated 1 million community-ambulating U.S. older adults, had severe impairments in peak expiratory flow in 2015; these older adults have a substantially higher risk of losing the ability to ambulate community distances over the subsequent year.

美国老年人呼气流量峰值与社区活动能力丧失之间的关系。
背景:社区流动性是生活在社区的老年人以患者为中心的重要结果。这些行动不便与社会孤立、住院率上升和死亡率上升有关。肺功能受损可能是活动能力下降的一个可改变的危险因素,肺部健康方面现有的不平等可能不成比例地导致黑人老年人的活动能力下降。材料/方法:4742名社区居住的老年人(加权n = 29,180,893)自报告在社区行走3个或更多街区的能力,从国家健康和老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)中抽取。用PEF法测定NHATS患者的肺功能。社区活动能力丧失定义为在1年随访评估中自我报告的行走能力不超过3个街区。采用分层多变量逻辑回归,并根据人口统计学、合并症、疼痛和辅助器具使用情况进行调整。结果:总体而言,73.7%的受试者PEF正常,18.6%的受试者PEF中度受损,7.7%的受试者PEF重度受损。那些有严重障碍的人更有可能是男性,并被认为是黑人。在未经调整的分析中,8.8%的PEF正常的老年人经历了活动能力丧失,而中度损伤的老年人为12.7%,重度损伤的老年人为19.7%。在完全调整的模型中,与正常PEF相比,严重PEF受损患者的活动能力丧失的几率高111% (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7),中度PEF受损患者的关系较弱(OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8)。结论:2015年,近8%(约100万)在社区活动的美国老年人呼气流量峰值严重受损;在接下来的一年里,这些老年人失去社区步行能力的风险要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信