Pain perception, opioid consumption and mobility following lateral compression pelvic ring injuries: a two-year prospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Camryn C Therrien, Kaj Ten Duis, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Inge H F Reininga, Frank F A IJpma
{"title":"Pain perception, opioid consumption and mobility following lateral compression pelvic ring injuries: a two-year prospective cohort study.","authors":"Camryn C Therrien, Kaj Ten Duis, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Inge H F Reininga, Frank F A IJpma","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04128-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A prospective longitudinal cohort study was performed to gain insight into the course of recovery in terms of pain, opioid consumption, and mobility in patients with a lateral compression (LC) pelvic injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with an LC injury, without any cognitive disorders or limited mobility and who could communicate in Dutch were asked to participate. Pain in terms of NRS (numeric rating scale, range 0-10), opioid use and mobility were recorded at eight time points: at hospital admission, and three days, one week, six weeks, three months, six months, one year and two years after the injury. A sub-analysis was performed for nonoperatively and operatively treated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven patients were included, of which 23 (24%) were treated operatively and 74 (76%) conservatively. Pain at rest and exertion, were highest upon admission (mean NRS of 3.4 (SD = 2.6) and 4.4 (SD = 2.8), respectively) but decreased within six weeks (mean NRS of 0.8 (SD = 1.6) and 2.0 (2.0), respectively). After two years, the mean NRS was 0.5 (SD = 1.6) and 0.9 (SD = 2.1), respectively. Upon admission, 85% were given opioids, however only 11% used opioids after three months and 4% after two years. At three months, 35% were walking using walking aids and 58% were walking independently. After two years, 98% were walking independently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain rapidly decreased within the first six weeks. Most patients did not need opioids after three months. Furthermore, most patients were walking with walking aids after six weeks. After two years, few patients experienced pain, used opioids or had difficulties walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04128-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was performed to gain insight into the course of recovery in terms of pain, opioid consumption, and mobility in patients with a lateral compression (LC) pelvic injury.

Methods: Adult patients with an LC injury, without any cognitive disorders or limited mobility and who could communicate in Dutch were asked to participate. Pain in terms of NRS (numeric rating scale, range 0-10), opioid use and mobility were recorded at eight time points: at hospital admission, and three days, one week, six weeks, three months, six months, one year and two years after the injury. A sub-analysis was performed for nonoperatively and operatively treated patients.

Results: Ninety-seven patients were included, of which 23 (24%) were treated operatively and 74 (76%) conservatively. Pain at rest and exertion, were highest upon admission (mean NRS of 3.4 (SD = 2.6) and 4.4 (SD = 2.8), respectively) but decreased within six weeks (mean NRS of 0.8 (SD = 1.6) and 2.0 (2.0), respectively). After two years, the mean NRS was 0.5 (SD = 1.6) and 0.9 (SD = 2.1), respectively. Upon admission, 85% were given opioids, however only 11% used opioids after three months and 4% after two years. At three months, 35% were walking using walking aids and 58% were walking independently. After two years, 98% were walking independently.

Conclusions: Pain rapidly decreased within the first six weeks. Most patients did not need opioids after three months. Furthermore, most patients were walking with walking aids after six weeks. After two years, few patients experienced pain, used opioids or had difficulties walking.

侧压迫性骨盆环损伤后的疼痛感知、阿片类药物消耗和活动能力:一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究。
目的:进行一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,以深入了解侧压迫(LC)骨盆损伤患者的疼痛,阿片类药物消耗和活动能力的恢复过程。方法:要求LC损伤的成年患者,无任何认知障碍或活动受限,可以用荷兰语交流。在8个时间点记录NRS(数值评定量表,范围0-10)、阿片类药物使用和活动能力方面的疼痛:入院时、受伤后3天、1周、6周、3个月、6个月、1年和2年。对非手术和手术患者进行亚组分析。结果:纳入97例患者,其中手术治疗23例(24%),保守治疗74例(76%)。休息和运动时的疼痛在入院时最高(平均NRS分别为3.4 (SD = 2.6)和4.4 (SD = 2.8)),但在六周内下降(平均NRS分别为0.8 (SD = 1.6)和2.0(2.0))。两年后,平均NRS分别为0.5 (SD = 1.6)和0.9 (SD = 2.1)。入院时,85%的患者使用阿片类药物,但三个月后只有11%使用阿片类药物,两年后只有4%使用阿片类药物。三个月时,35%的人使用助行器行走,58%的人独立行走。两年后,98%的人可以独立行走。结论:疼痛在前6周内迅速减轻。大多数患者在三个月后不再需要阿片类药物。此外,大多数患者在六周后使用助行器行走。两年后,很少有患者感到疼痛,使用阿片类药物或行走困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信