Favorable 30-day outcomes of initial open inguinal hernia repair with local anesthesia among frail patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Renxi Li, Jayati Atahar, Ahmed Noureldin, Susan Kartiko
{"title":"Favorable 30-day outcomes of initial open inguinal hernia repair with local anesthesia among frail patients.","authors":"Renxi Li, Jayati Atahar, Ahmed Noureldin, Susan Kartiko","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) can be conducted under either general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA). Despite a lack of evidence supporting improved perioperative outcomes, GA is the predominant anesthesia type used in OIHR. Frailty is defined as a clinically recognizable state of age-related increased vulnerability. This study aimed to compare the 30-day perioperative outcomes of frail patients undergoing OIHR with either GA or LA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent initial OIHR were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005-2021. Patients with a Modified Frailty Index (mFI)≥2 were included. Patients were divided based on GA or LA administered. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between frail patients undergoing OIHR under GA or LA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20,129 frail patients who underwent initial OIHR, 13,473 had GA, and 3686 had LA. The 30-day mortality rates for LA and GA were low. However, frail patients who underwent LA had a lower risk of bleeding (aOR 0.282, P=0.04), superficial surgical site infection (aOR 0.450, P=0.03), and discharge not to home (aOR 0.792, P<0.01). In addition, frail patients who underwent LA had shorter operation time (58.42±25.26 vs 67.60±37.17 mins, P<0.01) and a shorter length of stay (0.45±2.30 vs 0.57±2.96 days, P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although GA is the dominant anesthesia use (4:1) in OIHR among frail patients, LA emerges as a safe alternative to GA for these patients, offering potential benefits such as reduced complications and increased day-case surgery volume, which may be associated with decreased healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.12.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) can be conducted under either general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA). Despite a lack of evidence supporting improved perioperative outcomes, GA is the predominant anesthesia type used in OIHR. Frailty is defined as a clinically recognizable state of age-related increased vulnerability. This study aimed to compare the 30-day perioperative outcomes of frail patients undergoing OIHR with either GA or LA.

Methods: Patients who underwent initial OIHR were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005-2021. Patients with a Modified Frailty Index (mFI)≥2 were included. Patients were divided based on GA or LA administered. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between frail patients undergoing OIHR under GA or LA.

Results: Among 20,129 frail patients who underwent initial OIHR, 13,473 had GA, and 3686 had LA. The 30-day mortality rates for LA and GA were low. However, frail patients who underwent LA had a lower risk of bleeding (aOR 0.282, P=0.04), superficial surgical site infection (aOR 0.450, P=0.03), and discharge not to home (aOR 0.792, P<0.01). In addition, frail patients who underwent LA had shorter operation time (58.42±25.26 vs 67.60±37.17 mins, P<0.01) and a shorter length of stay (0.45±2.30 vs 0.57±2.96 days, P<0.01).

Conclusion: Although GA is the dominant anesthesia use (4:1) in OIHR among frail patients, LA emerges as a safe alternative to GA for these patients, offering potential benefits such as reduced complications and increased day-case surgery volume, which may be associated with decreased healthcare costs.

局部麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术治疗体弱患者30天预后良好。
背景:开放式腹股沟疝修补术(OIHR)可以在全麻(GA)或局麻(LA)下进行。尽管缺乏支持改善围手术期结果的证据,GA仍是OIHR中使用的主要麻醉类型。虚弱被定义为临床可识别的与年龄相关的脆弱性增加的状态。本研究旨在比较体弱患者接受OIHR与GA或LA的30天围手术期结果。方法:在ACS-NSQIP数据库中识别2005-2021年间首次接受OIHR的患者。纳入改良虚弱指数(mFI)≥2的患者。患者根据GA或LA进行分组。采用多变量logistic回归比较在GA或LA下接受OIHR的虚弱患者的30天围手术期结果。结果:在接受初始OIHR的20129名虚弱患者中,13473名患有GA, 3686名患有LA。LA和GA的30天死亡率较低。然而,接受LA的体弱患者出血(aOR 0.282, P=0.04)、手术部位浅表感染(aOR 0.450, P=0.03)和出院不回家(aOR 0.792, P)的风险较低。结论:尽管GA是体弱患者OIHR中主要的麻醉使用(4:1),但LA对这些患者来说是一种安全的替代GA的方法,提供了潜在的好处,如减少并发症和增加日手术量,这可能与降低医疗成本有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization. JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信