Creation and validation of an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) clinical risk scoring tool for select Enterobacterales in non-urinary isolates.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/phar.4646
Jordan Jones, Taylor Morrisette, Aaron Hamby, Krutika Mediwala Hornback, Rachel Burgoon
{"title":"Creation and validation of an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) clinical risk scoring tool for select Enterobacterales in non-urinary isolates.","authors":"Jordan Jones, Taylor Morrisette, Aaron Hamby, Krutika Mediwala Hornback, Rachel Burgoon","doi":"10.1002/phar.4646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are increasing in the United States. Although many risk factor scoring tools exist, many are specific to bloodstream isolates and may not represent all patient populations. The purpose of this study was to create and validate an institution-specific scoring tool for select ESBL-E of non-urinary origin based on previously identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, case-control analysis included inpatient adults at an academic medical center from July 2021 through August 2023 with a documented ESBL-E or non-ESBL-E infection of non-urinary origin. Patients with ESBL-E isolates were matched in a 1:1 ratio to non-ESBL-E isolates by organism and specimen type. Points for each risk factor were assigned by dividing their respective regression coefficient by half of the smallest regression coefficient and rounding to the nearest integer (prior ESBL-E within the past 12 months: 6 points, urinary catheter: 3 points, central venous catheter: 2 points, cirrhosis: 2 points). Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for each score, and discriminatory power was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1139 identified cultures, 140 patients met the criteria for inclusion into the ESBL-E case arm, thus 140 patients with non-ESBL-E cultures were matched as controls. Baseline characteristics were relatively similar between the groups. A score of 0 was associated with low risk of ESBL-E (PPV 0.31, NPV 0.36), whereas scores between 2 and 5 were considered moderate risk (PPV 0.56, NPV 0.55), and scores ≥6 were associated with high risk (PPV 0.91, NPV 0.56). The ROC curve AUC was 0.705.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of ESBL-E risk factor scoring tools are specific to isolates causing bloodstream infections. This institution-specific scoring tool may be used to tailor empiric antimicrobial regimens and decrease unnecessary exposure to carbapenems in non-ESBL-E infections of non-urinary origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are increasing in the United States. Although many risk factor scoring tools exist, many are specific to bloodstream isolates and may not represent all patient populations. The purpose of this study was to create and validate an institution-specific scoring tool for select ESBL-E of non-urinary origin based on previously identified risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective, case-control analysis included inpatient adults at an academic medical center from July 2021 through August 2023 with a documented ESBL-E or non-ESBL-E infection of non-urinary origin. Patients with ESBL-E isolates were matched in a 1:1 ratio to non-ESBL-E isolates by organism and specimen type. Points for each risk factor were assigned by dividing their respective regression coefficient by half of the smallest regression coefficient and rounding to the nearest integer (prior ESBL-E within the past 12 months: 6 points, urinary catheter: 3 points, central venous catheter: 2 points, cirrhosis: 2 points). Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for each score, and discriminatory power was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Of the 1139 identified cultures, 140 patients met the criteria for inclusion into the ESBL-E case arm, thus 140 patients with non-ESBL-E cultures were matched as controls. Baseline characteristics were relatively similar between the groups. A score of 0 was associated with low risk of ESBL-E (PPV 0.31, NPV 0.36), whereas scores between 2 and 5 were considered moderate risk (PPV 0.56, NPV 0.55), and scores ≥6 were associated with high risk (PPV 0.91, NPV 0.56). The ROC curve AUC was 0.705.

Conclusions: The majority of ESBL-E risk factor scoring tools are specific to isolates causing bloodstream infections. This institution-specific scoring tool may be used to tailor empiric antimicrobial regimens and decrease unnecessary exposure to carbapenems in non-ESBL-E infections of non-urinary origin.

非尿路分离肠杆菌中产生β -内酰胺酶的广谱肠杆菌(ESBL-E)临床风险评分工具的创建和验证
背景:在美国,由广谱产β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌(ESBL-E)引起的感染正在增加。尽管存在许多风险因素评分工具,但许多工具是针对血液分离株的,可能不能代表所有患者群体。本研究的目的是创建和验证一个机构特定的评分工具,用于根据先前确定的风险因素选择非尿源性ESBL-E。方法:这项回顾性病例对照分析纳入了2021年7月至2023年8月在一家学术医疗中心住院的非尿源性ESBL-E或非ESBL-E感染的成人患者。感染ESBL-E分离株的患者按生物体和标本类型按1:1的比例与非ESBL-E分离株进行匹配。通过将各自的回归系数除以最小回归系数的一半并四舍五入到最接近的整数(过去12个月内的ESBL-E: 6分,导尿管:3分,中心静脉导管:2分,肝硬化:2分)来分配每个危险因素的积分。计算每个评分的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)-曲线下面积(AUC)评估区分能力。结果:在鉴定的1139例培养物中,140例患者符合纳入ESBL-E病例组的标准,因此140例非ESBL-E培养物患者作为对照。两组之间的基线特征相对相似。得分0分与ESBL-E低风险相关(PPV 0.31, NPV 0.36),而得分2至5分被认为是中度风险(PPV 0.56, NPV 0.55),得分≥6分与高风险相关(PPV 0.91, NPV 0.56)。ROC曲线AUC为0.705。结论:大多数ESBL-E危险因素评分工具是针对引起血流感染的分离株的。这种机构特异性评分工具可用于定制经验性抗菌方案,并减少非尿源性非esbl - e感染中不必要的碳青霉烯类暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信