Retrospective Analysis of Ceftriaxone 1 Gram or 2 Grams for Bacteremia.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jae Hee Park, Alan Zhao, Rachel Bain, Bessma Hassani, Christina Tang
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Ceftriaxone 1 Gram or 2 Grams for Bacteremia.","authors":"Jae Hee Park, Alan Zhao, Rachel Bain, Bessma Hassani, Christina Tang","doi":"10.1177/08971900241313399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin commonly used for treating bacteremia caused by gram-positive organisms such as <i>Streptococcus spp.</i> and gram-negative organisms such as Enterobacterales. The typical doses for treating bacteremia are either 1 gram or 2 grams daily. Despite its widespread use, there are limited data on the optimal treatment dose for bacteremia. <b>Methods:</b> This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the difference in the clinical failure rate among patients who received 1 gram or 2 grams of ceftriaxone once daily for documented bacteremia. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of the following: antibiotic escalation, escalation to intensive care, and 30-day readmission due to an infectious cause. Adult patients admitted to Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Valley Stream, LIJ Forest Hills, or LIJ Medical Center in 2022 who received ceftriaxone were reviewed for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received ceftriaxone for endocarditis or meningitis, had a positive blood culture with a ceftriaxone-resistant pathogen, or received ceftriaxone for less than 72 hours. <b>Results:</b> A total of 128 patients were included in this study. Approximately 46.9% of the participants received a 1 gram dose, while 53.2% received a 2 gram dose. 35.4% of patients in the 2 gram group experienced clinical failure compared to 21.7% in the 1 gram group (<i>P</i> = .08, OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.11). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings indicate that the primary outcome of clinical failure did not significantly differ between the 1 gram and 2 gram doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241313399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241313399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin commonly used for treating bacteremia caused by gram-positive organisms such as Streptococcus spp. and gram-negative organisms such as Enterobacterales. The typical doses for treating bacteremia are either 1 gram or 2 grams daily. Despite its widespread use, there are limited data on the optimal treatment dose for bacteremia. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the difference in the clinical failure rate among patients who received 1 gram or 2 grams of ceftriaxone once daily for documented bacteremia. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of the following: antibiotic escalation, escalation to intensive care, and 30-day readmission due to an infectious cause. Adult patients admitted to Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Valley Stream, LIJ Forest Hills, or LIJ Medical Center in 2022 who received ceftriaxone were reviewed for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received ceftriaxone for endocarditis or meningitis, had a positive blood culture with a ceftriaxone-resistant pathogen, or received ceftriaxone for less than 72 hours. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in this study. Approximately 46.9% of the participants received a 1 gram dose, while 53.2% received a 2 gram dose. 35.4% of patients in the 2 gram group experienced clinical failure compared to 21.7% in the 1 gram group (P = .08, OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.11). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the primary outcome of clinical failure did not significantly differ between the 1 gram and 2 gram doses.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信