Preanalytical Considerations of Handling Suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Specimens Within the Clinical Pathology Laboratories: A Survey-Based Approach.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carla Stephan, Taylor Kalomeris, Yaxin Li, Jeffrey Kubiak, Sabrina Racine-Brzostek, Ivo SahBandar, Zhen Zhao, Melissa M Cushing, He S Yang
{"title":"Preanalytical Considerations of Handling Suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Specimens Within the Clinical Pathology Laboratories: A Survey-Based Approach.","authors":"Carla Stephan, Taylor Kalomeris, Yaxin Li, Jeffrey Kubiak, Sabrina Racine-Brzostek, Ivo SahBandar, Zhen Zhao, Melissa M Cushing, He S Yang","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a rare, fatal, and transmissible neurodegenerative disorder caused by prion proteins. Handling specimens from individuals with suspected or confirmed cases presents a safety challenge to hospital workers including clinical laboratory staff. As no national guidelines exist, the clinical pathology laboratory must establish protocols for handling these specimens to ensure sufficient protective measures. This study aims to explore how various medical institutions manage CJD specimens, as a first step toward developing standardized preanalytical protocols for safe specimen handling by health care professionals. <b>Methods:</b> An electronic survey was generated and disseminated to diplomats of the American Board of Clinical Chemistry and was posted on the Listserv platform of the American Society for Microbiology and the Artery forum of the Association for Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine. The survey evaluated various procedures and precautions implemented, the nature of the specimens processed, and whether they are processed in-house or sent to reference laboratories. <b>Results:</b> A total of 49 responses were collected. Most respondents (64%) noted their laboratories process specimens with a clinical suspicion of CJD regardless of the level of suspicion, 13% handled specimens only if the degree of suspicion was low, and 16% did not process specimens in-house at all. Among those who process CJD specimens, practices varied greatly, including different levels of precautions, use of biological safety cabinets, aliquoting, disposal, and disinfection procedures. <b>Conclusions:</b> A lack of standardization across laboratories exists for the handling of specimens of patients with suspected CJD. This study summarizes the approaches reported by survey respondents, providing a rationale for developing protocols for the safe handling of these specimens and highlighting the need to develop uniform universal standardized processing procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a rare, fatal, and transmissible neurodegenerative disorder caused by prion proteins. Handling specimens from individuals with suspected or confirmed cases presents a safety challenge to hospital workers including clinical laboratory staff. As no national guidelines exist, the clinical pathology laboratory must establish protocols for handling these specimens to ensure sufficient protective measures. This study aims to explore how various medical institutions manage CJD specimens, as a first step toward developing standardized preanalytical protocols for safe specimen handling by health care professionals. Methods: An electronic survey was generated and disseminated to diplomats of the American Board of Clinical Chemistry and was posted on the Listserv platform of the American Society for Microbiology and the Artery forum of the Association for Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine. The survey evaluated various procedures and precautions implemented, the nature of the specimens processed, and whether they are processed in-house or sent to reference laboratories. Results: A total of 49 responses were collected. Most respondents (64%) noted their laboratories process specimens with a clinical suspicion of CJD regardless of the level of suspicion, 13% handled specimens only if the degree of suspicion was low, and 16% did not process specimens in-house at all. Among those who process CJD specimens, practices varied greatly, including different levels of precautions, use of biological safety cabinets, aliquoting, disposal, and disinfection procedures. Conclusions: A lack of standardization across laboratories exists for the handling of specimens of patients with suspected CJD. This study summarizes the approaches reported by survey respondents, providing a rationale for developing protocols for the safe handling of these specimens and highlighting the need to develop uniform universal standardized processing procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信