Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Augmented Partial Repair with Acellular Dermal Allograft and Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Follow-Up.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seung-Jin Yoo, Byung-Suk Kim, Ho-Hyup Kim, Sungwook Choi
{"title":"Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Augmented Partial Repair with Acellular Dermal Allograft and Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Seung-Jin Yoo, Byung-Suk Kim, Ho-Hyup Kim, Sungwook Choi","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic augmented partial repair (APR) with acellular dermal matrix versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in massive rotator cuff tears. <b>Methods:</b> The study included a total of 49 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic APR (26 patients) and SCR (23 patients) between March 2018 and June 2021. Clinical scores, visual analog scores, and range of motion were collected preoperatively and postoperatively until the last follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative simple radiographs were evaluated for arthropathic changes and acromiohumeral distances (AHDs). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess the integrity of repaired structures at 12 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> The average age of patients was 63.9 years (range 53-74 years), and the mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years (range 2.1-2.9). The average UCLA scores improved from 18.0 to 33.2 and from 16.3 to 32.1 in APR and SCR groups at the last follow-up, respectively. For the ranges of motion, the APR group consistently showed better external rotation ranges from the postoperative 6th month until the last follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the APR group revealed better ranges of motion in forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation compared to the SCR group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Postoperative AHD showed better improvement in the APR group than the SCR group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Re-tears were found in two patients in each group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both APR and SCR groups showed comparable improvement in clinical outcomes in massive rotator cuff tears, while the APR group showed statistically significant improvement in the range of motion compared to the SCR group, especially for external rotations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic augmented partial repair (APR) with acellular dermal matrix versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in massive rotator cuff tears. Methods: The study included a total of 49 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic APR (26 patients) and SCR (23 patients) between March 2018 and June 2021. Clinical scores, visual analog scores, and range of motion were collected preoperatively and postoperatively until the last follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative simple radiographs were evaluated for arthropathic changes and acromiohumeral distances (AHDs). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess the integrity of repaired structures at 12 months postoperatively. Results: The average age of patients was 63.9 years (range 53-74 years), and the mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years (range 2.1-2.9). The average UCLA scores improved from 18.0 to 33.2 and from 16.3 to 32.1 in APR and SCR groups at the last follow-up, respectively. For the ranges of motion, the APR group consistently showed better external rotation ranges from the postoperative 6th month until the last follow-up (p < 0.05), and the APR group revealed better ranges of motion in forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation compared to the SCR group (p < 0.05). Postoperative AHD showed better improvement in the APR group than the SCR group (p < 0.05). Re-tears were found in two patients in each group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Both APR and SCR groups showed comparable improvement in clinical outcomes in massive rotator cuff tears, while the APR group showed statistically significant improvement in the range of motion compared to the SCR group, especially for external rotations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信