Feasibility Testing of the Automatic Design of Three-Unit Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Dental CAD Software: A Pre-Clinical Pilot Trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Selina A Bernauer, Philipp Wieland, Nicola U Zitzmann, Tim Joda
{"title":"Feasibility Testing of the Automatic Design of Three-Unit Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Dental CAD Software: A Pre-Clinical Pilot Trial.","authors":"Selina A Bernauer, Philipp Wieland, Nicola U Zitzmann, Tim Joda","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The technical development of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDP) initially concentrated on the computer-aided manufacturing of prosthetic restorations (CAM). Advances in information technologies have shifted the focus for optimizing digital workflows to AI-based processes for design (CAD). This pre-clinical pilot trial investigated the feasibility of the automatic design of three-unit iFDPs using CAD software (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH). <b>Methods:</b> Two clinical scenarios based on a full dentition were created virtually. Physical models were produced and digitized using two intraoral scanners applying quadrant or full-arch scans (Trios3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Primescan AC, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). For each scenario, iFDP designs were generated automatically using two laboratory software systems (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH), resulting in 80 STL datasets (2 scenarios × 2 scan strategies × 2 IOS systems × 5 scan repetitions × 2 software). The files were analyzed clinically for the contact schemes and pontic area. One of the automated designs for each scenario was manually post-processed and one iFDP design for each scenario was manually created by experienced dental technicians (control). The time required for all the design processes was recorded. <b>Results:</b> The automatic design of iFDPs without manual adjustment did not lead to clinically acceptable restorations. The time required for the automatically generated/manually adjusted iFDPs designs was not significantly different to that for the manually designed restorations. <b>Conclusions:</b> Current laboratory software can not automatically generate three-unit iFDPs with clinically acceptable results in terms of the interproximal and occlusal contacts and the pontic design. The automatic iFDP design process currently requires manual adjustment, which means there is no benefit in terms of the working time compared with manually created restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The technical development of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDP) initially concentrated on the computer-aided manufacturing of prosthetic restorations (CAM). Advances in information technologies have shifted the focus for optimizing digital workflows to AI-based processes for design (CAD). This pre-clinical pilot trial investigated the feasibility of the automatic design of three-unit iFDPs using CAD software (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH). Methods: Two clinical scenarios based on a full dentition were created virtually. Physical models were produced and digitized using two intraoral scanners applying quadrant or full-arch scans (Trios3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Primescan AC, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). For each scenario, iFDP designs were generated automatically using two laboratory software systems (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH), resulting in 80 STL datasets (2 scenarios × 2 scan strategies × 2 IOS systems × 5 scan repetitions × 2 software). The files were analyzed clinically for the contact schemes and pontic area. One of the automated designs for each scenario was manually post-processed and one iFDP design for each scenario was manually created by experienced dental technicians (control). The time required for all the design processes was recorded. Results: The automatic design of iFDPs without manual adjustment did not lead to clinically acceptable restorations. The time required for the automatically generated/manually adjusted iFDPs designs was not significantly different to that for the manually designed restorations. Conclusions: Current laboratory software can not automatically generate three-unit iFDPs with clinically acceptable results in terms of the interproximal and occlusal contacts and the pontic design. The automatic iFDP design process currently requires manual adjustment, which means there is no benefit in terms of the working time compared with manually created restorations.

不同牙科CAD软件对三单元种植固定修复体自动设计的可行性测试:临床前试验。
背景/目的:种植体支持的固定牙修复体(iFDP)的技术发展最初集中在计算机辅助制造修复体(CAM)上。信息技术的进步已经将优化数字工作流程的重点转移到基于人工智能的设计过程(CAD)。这项临床前试点试验调查了使用CAD软件自动设计三单元ifdp的可行性(Dental manager 2021, 3Shape;牙科cad 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH)。方法:以全牙列为基础,虚拟创建两个临床场景。物理模型的制作和数字化使用两个口内扫描仪应用象限或全弓扫描(Trios3, 3Shape,哥本哈根,丹麦;Primescan AC, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany)。对于每种情况,使用两个实验室软件系统自动生成iFDP设计(Dental manager 2021, 3Shape;DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH),得到80个STL数据集(2个场景× 2个扫描策略× 2个IOS系统× 5个扫描重复× 2个软件)。临床分析了接触方案和桥突面积。每个场景的一个自动化设计是手动后处理的,每个场景的一个iFDP设计是由经验丰富的牙科技术人员(对照组)手动创建的。记录了所有设计过程所需的时间。结果:自动设计的ifdp不需要人工调节,不能获得临床可接受的修复体。自动生成/手动调整iFDPs设计所需的时间与手动设计修复所需的时间无显著差异。结论:目前的实验室软件无法自动生成具有临床上可接受的近端间、咬合接触和桥体设计结果的三单元ifdp。自动iFDP设计过程目前需要手动调整,这意味着与手动创建恢复相比,在工作时间方面没有任何好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信