Disposition of emergency department patients presenting with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Blake Briggs, David Cline, Iltifat Husain
{"title":"Disposition of emergency department patients presenting with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema.","authors":"Blake Briggs, David Cline, Iltifat Husain","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00772-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the most common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Our primary objective was to provide descriptive evidence regarding emergency department (ED) disposition of ACEI-induced angioedema patients. Our secondary objective was to evaluate unique patterns in those with ACEI-induced angioedema at a tertiary referral center, including demographics, details of those requiring intubation, length of inpatient stay, and allergy documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study evaluating all cases of ACEI-induced angioedema at a large, regional academic medical center. We performed a medical record review to identify patients with ACEI-induced angioedema who presented to the ED from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. A structured data abstraction process was utilized to select patients of interest, followed by descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and odds ratios for categorical data, and Kruskal Wallis tests for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 637 unique patient encounters met potential inclusion. After a substantial, standardized review, 94 patients met inclusion. During the study period, there were 94 patients presenting to the ED who were diagnosed as having angioedema secondary to an ACEI (90 patients) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (4 patients). Overall, 53 patients (56.38%) improved during their ED stay, and of those, 32 patients (60.38%) were discharged home. None of the 12 patients that worsened were sent home from the ED. Those who were discharged from the ED with a median stay of 4 h had no increased risk of return to the ED versus those who were admitted. The only treatment found to have statistical association with disposition was intramuscular epinephrine. Only 13 of 43 ED discharged patients (23.64%) had their ACEI/ARB documented in their allergy listings compared to 42 of 51 patients (76.36%) of admitted patients, odds ratio of failure to document was 0.0929 (95% CI, 0.0352 to 0.24512). Only one patient out of the total 94 returned to the ED due to recurrent angioedema symptoms during our study period and was subsequently discharged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that at a large, tertiary care referral center, patients with ACEI-angioedema who did not exhibit severe symptoms were safely discharged home with low risk of early return visit to the ED. Severe symptoms were found to be any throat symptoms, voice change, drooling, worsening swelling, or complaints of dyspnea. Further, among those admitted, patients in our study had a short inpatient stay and were safely discharged with no documented early return visit to the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00772-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the most common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Our primary objective was to provide descriptive evidence regarding emergency department (ED) disposition of ACEI-induced angioedema patients. Our secondary objective was to evaluate unique patterns in those with ACEI-induced angioedema at a tertiary referral center, including demographics, details of those requiring intubation, length of inpatient stay, and allergy documentation.

Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating all cases of ACEI-induced angioedema at a large, regional academic medical center. We performed a medical record review to identify patients with ACEI-induced angioedema who presented to the ED from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. A structured data abstraction process was utilized to select patients of interest, followed by descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and odds ratios for categorical data, and Kruskal Wallis tests for continuous data.

Results: A total of 637 unique patient encounters met potential inclusion. After a substantial, standardized review, 94 patients met inclusion. During the study period, there were 94 patients presenting to the ED who were diagnosed as having angioedema secondary to an ACEI (90 patients) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (4 patients). Overall, 53 patients (56.38%) improved during their ED stay, and of those, 32 patients (60.38%) were discharged home. None of the 12 patients that worsened were sent home from the ED. Those who were discharged from the ED with a median stay of 4 h had no increased risk of return to the ED versus those who were admitted. The only treatment found to have statistical association with disposition was intramuscular epinephrine. Only 13 of 43 ED discharged patients (23.64%) had their ACEI/ARB documented in their allergy listings compared to 42 of 51 patients (76.36%) of admitted patients, odds ratio of failure to document was 0.0929 (95% CI, 0.0352 to 0.24512). Only one patient out of the total 94 returned to the ED due to recurrent angioedema symptoms during our study period and was subsequently discharged.

Conclusion: Our results indicated that at a large, tertiary care referral center, patients with ACEI-angioedema who did not exhibit severe symptoms were safely discharged home with low risk of early return visit to the ED. Severe symptoms were found to be any throat symptoms, voice change, drooling, worsening swelling, or complaints of dyspnea. Further, among those admitted, patients in our study had a short inpatient stay and were safely discharged with no documented early return visit to the ED.

急诊科血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂诱导血管性水肿患者的处理。
背景:在美国,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)是药物性血管性水肿最常见的原因。我们的主要目的是提供关于急诊部门(ED)处理acei引起的血管性水肿患者的描述性证据。我们的次要目的是评估三级转诊中心acei诱导的血管性水肿的独特模式,包括人口统计学、需要插管的详细信息、住院时间和过敏记录。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,评估了一家大型区域性学术医疗中心的所有acei诱导血管性水肿病例。我们对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日在急诊科就诊的acei诱导血管性水肿患者进行了医疗记录回顾。采用结构化的数据抽象过程选择感兴趣的患者,然后对分类数据进行描述性统计、卡方检验和比值比检验,对连续数据进行Kruskal Wallis检验。结果:共有637例独特的患者遭遇符合潜在纳入。经过大量的标准化审查,94名患者符合纳入标准。在研究期间,有94例ED患者被诊断为继发于ACEI(90例)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)(4例)的血管性水肿。总体而言,53例患者(56.38%)在急诊科住院期间病情好转,其中32例患者(60.38%)出院回家。12名病情恶化的患者都没有被从急诊科送回家。与入院的患者相比,那些中位住院时间为4小时的出院患者返回急诊科的风险没有增加。唯一发现与倾向有统计学关联的治疗方法是肌内注射肾上腺素。43例ED出院患者中只有13例(23.64%)在过敏清单中记录了他们的ACEI/ARB,而51例入院患者中有42例(76.36%),未记录的优势比为0.0929 (95% CI, 0.0352 ~ 0.24512)。在我们的研究期间,94例患者中只有1例因复发性血管性水肿症状返回急诊科并随后出院。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在一家大型三级医疗转诊中心,没有出现严重症状的acei -血管性水肿患者可以安全地出院回家,早期回访急诊科的风险很低。严重症状包括任何喉咙症状、声音改变、流口水、肿胀加重或呼吸困难。此外,在我们的研究中,入院的患者住院时间很短,并且安全出院,没有早期回访急诊室的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信