Optimising fatigue, abdominal pain and faecal incontinence in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-BOOST Optimise): feasibility study of a checklist and algorithm for initial nurse-led management.

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Imogen Stagg, Ailsa Hart, Fionn Cléirigh Büttner, Asma Fikree, John McLaughlin, Jean-Frederic LeBlanc, Sonia Bouri, Thomas Hamborg, Laura Miller, Christine Norton
{"title":"Optimising fatigue, abdominal pain and faecal incontinence in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-BOOST Optimise): feasibility study of a checklist and algorithm for initial nurse-led management.","authors":"Imogen Stagg, Ailsa Hart, Fionn Cléirigh Büttner, Asma Fikree, John McLaughlin, Jean-Frederic LeBlanc, Sonia Bouri, Thomas Hamborg, Laura Miller, Christine Norton","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence that some feel are inadequately addressed. It is unknown how many have potentially reversible medical issues underlying these symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study testing the feasibility of a patient-reported symptom checklist and nurse-administered management algorithm ('Optimise') to manage common medical causes of IBD-related fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence. We conducted qualitative interviews with nurses implementing the algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>515 individuals reporting IBD-related symptoms were invited to participate, of whom 201 (39%) consented. 194/201 (97%) returned the symptom checklist, of whom 157 (81%) returned a postal faecal calprotectin sample. Five (3%) participants reported 'red flags' and 31/157 (20%) participants had a faecal calprotectin result ≥200 µg/g, of whom 12 (8%) were judged to have likely active inflammation when clinical symptoms and disease history were reviewed. The algorithm suggested at least one clinical test or intervention for fatigue, pain or faecal incontinence in 67 (43%) participants, of whom 25 (37%) declined. Among 87 participants for whom clinical actions were indicated, 57 (66%) completed follow-up outcomes 3 months after algorithm implementation. Three nurses interviewed found the Optimise algorithm easy to administer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the Optimise checklist and algorithm appears feasible in UK clinical practice, with adjustments needed to minimise missing items. Not all patients accepted algorithm-indicated interventions, but a yield of 43% with symptoms having potentially reversible causes detected is clinically useful. Nurses endorsed ease and utility of the implementation process. Optimise now needs clinical effectiveness to be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Many people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence that some feel are inadequately addressed. It is unknown how many have potentially reversible medical issues underlying these symptoms.

Methods: We conducted a study testing the feasibility of a patient-reported symptom checklist and nurse-administered management algorithm ('Optimise') to manage common medical causes of IBD-related fatigue, pain and faecal incontinence. We conducted qualitative interviews with nurses implementing the algorithm.

Results: 515 individuals reporting IBD-related symptoms were invited to participate, of whom 201 (39%) consented. 194/201 (97%) returned the symptom checklist, of whom 157 (81%) returned a postal faecal calprotectin sample. Five (3%) participants reported 'red flags' and 31/157 (20%) participants had a faecal calprotectin result ≥200 µg/g, of whom 12 (8%) were judged to have likely active inflammation when clinical symptoms and disease history were reviewed. The algorithm suggested at least one clinical test or intervention for fatigue, pain or faecal incontinence in 67 (43%) participants, of whom 25 (37%) declined. Among 87 participants for whom clinical actions were indicated, 57 (66%) completed follow-up outcomes 3 months after algorithm implementation. Three nurses interviewed found the Optimise algorithm easy to administer.

Conclusion: Implementing the Optimise checklist and algorithm appears feasible in UK clinical practice, with adjustments needed to minimise missing items. Not all patients accepted algorithm-indicated interventions, but a yield of 43% with symptoms having potentially reversible causes detected is clinically useful. Nurses endorsed ease and utility of the implementation process. Optimise now needs clinical effectiveness to be assessed.

优化炎症性肠病患者的疲劳、腹痛和大便失禁(IBD-BOOST Optimise):初步护士领导管理的检查表和算法的可行性研究
目的:许多患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的人会感到疲劳、疼痛和大便失禁,一些人认为这些症状没有得到充分解决。目前尚不清楚有多少人在这些症状背后有潜在的可逆医学问题。方法:我们进行了一项研究,测试了患者报告的症状清单和护士管理算法(“优化”)的可行性,以管理ibd相关的疲劳、疼痛和大便失禁的常见医学原因。我们对实施该算法的护士进行了定性访谈。结果:515名报告ibd相关症状的个体被邀请参加,其中201人(39%)同意。194/201例(97%)返回症状清单,其中157例(81%)返回邮寄的粪钙保护蛋白样本。5名(3%)参与者报告了“危险信号”,31/157(20%)参与者的粪便钙保护蛋白结果≥200µg/g,其中12名(8%)参与者在回顾临床症状和病史时被判断为可能有活动性炎症。该算法建议67名(43%)参与者至少进行一次疲劳、疼痛或大便失禁的临床测试或干预,其中25名(37%)拒绝。在87名需要采取临床行动的参与者中,57名(66%)在算法实施3个月后完成了随访结果。受访的三名护士认为Optimise算法易于管理。结论:在英国临床实践中实施Optimise检查表和算法似乎是可行的,需要进行调整以尽量减少缺失项目。并非所有患者都接受了算法指示的干预措施,但在检测到具有潜在可逆原因的症状时,成功率为43%,这在临床上是有用的。护士对实施过程的便捷性和实用性表示赞同。Optimise现在需要临床效果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信