Value-based healthcare for social insurance medicine: key enablers for adoption in practice.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marije E Hagendijk, Nina Zipfel, Philip J Van Der Wees, Marijke Melles, Jan L Hoving, Sylvia J van der Burg-Vermeulen
{"title":"Value-based healthcare for social insurance medicine: key enablers for adoption in practice.","authors":"Marije E Hagendijk, Nina Zipfel, Philip J Van Der Wees, Marijke Melles, Jan L Hoving, Sylvia J van der Burg-Vermeulen","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Driven by rising retirement age and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases impacting work participation, there is an increasing need for quality and efficiency improvement in social insurance medicine (SIM). SIM provides guidance to individuals facing long-term work disability, assess their functional abilities and eligibility for long-term disability benefits. Value-based healthcare (VBHC) targets quality and efficiency improvements in healthcare by placing a priority on improving patient value. So far, VBHC has been introduced with fundamental principles and essential components for its adoption in curative care. Hence, there is room for debate on what are key enablers for the adoption of value-based SIM.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to explore key enablers for the adoption of VBHC in the practice of SIM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this exploratory qualitative study, participants consisted of 15 professionals with expertise either in SIM (n=10) or with expertise in the adoption of VBHC in the curative care sector (n=5). Each participant took part in both a semistructured individual interview and a focus group interview. Thematic coding was employed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven key enablers were identified: (1) investigate the meaning and implementation constraints of value in SIM, (2) integrate SIM into work-focused care networks, (3) explore the need and feasibility for specialisation based on functional problems, (4) identify the most important work outcomes for the patient, (5) identify proxy indicators for cost drivers, (6) identify value-driven financial incentives and (7) develop an information technology system to exchange data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper provides understanding of what is needed to adopt value-based SIM. Future research should delve deeper into these seven key enablers to facilitate the adoption of VBHC, and thereby promote value creation in the practice of SIM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Driven by rising retirement age and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases impacting work participation, there is an increasing need for quality and efficiency improvement in social insurance medicine (SIM). SIM provides guidance to individuals facing long-term work disability, assess their functional abilities and eligibility for long-term disability benefits. Value-based healthcare (VBHC) targets quality and efficiency improvements in healthcare by placing a priority on improving patient value. So far, VBHC has been introduced with fundamental principles and essential components for its adoption in curative care. Hence, there is room for debate on what are key enablers for the adoption of value-based SIM.

Purpose: The study aims to explore key enablers for the adoption of VBHC in the practice of SIM.

Methods: In this exploratory qualitative study, participants consisted of 15 professionals with expertise either in SIM (n=10) or with expertise in the adoption of VBHC in the curative care sector (n=5). Each participant took part in both a semistructured individual interview and a focus group interview. Thematic coding was employed to analyse the data.

Results: Seven key enablers were identified: (1) investigate the meaning and implementation constraints of value in SIM, (2) integrate SIM into work-focused care networks, (3) explore the need and feasibility for specialisation based on functional problems, (4) identify the most important work outcomes for the patient, (5) identify proxy indicators for cost drivers, (6) identify value-driven financial incentives and (7) develop an information technology system to exchange data.

Conclusions: This paper provides understanding of what is needed to adopt value-based SIM. Future research should delve deeper into these seven key enablers to facilitate the adoption of VBHC, and thereby promote value creation in the practice of SIM.

基于价值的社会保险医疗保健:在实践中采用的关键推动因素。
背景:随着退休年龄的提高和影响工作参与的慢性病患病率的增加,越来越需要提高社会保险医疗(SIM)的质量和效率。SIM为面临长期工作残疾的个人提供指导,评估他们的功能能力和长期残疾福利的资格。基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)通过优先考虑提高患者价值,以提高医疗保健的质量和效率为目标。到目前为止,VBHC已经介绍了基本原则和基本组成部分,以便在治疗护理中采用。因此,对于采用基于价值的SIM的关键推动因素是什么,还有争论的余地。目的:本研究旨在探索在SIM实践中采用VBHC的关键促成因素。方法:在这项探索性质的研究中,参与者由15名专业人员组成,他们具有SIM (n=10)或在治疗护理部门采用VBHC方面的专业知识(n=5)。每个参与者都参加了半结构化的个人访谈和焦点小组访谈。采用专题编码对数据进行分析。结果:确定了七个关键的促成因素:(1)调查SIM中价值的含义和实施约束,(2)将SIM整合到以工作为中心的护理网络中,(3)探索基于功能问题的专业化的需求和可行性,(4)确定对患者最重要的工作成果,(5)确定成本驱动的代理指标,(6)确定价值驱动的财务激励,(7)开发信息技术系统来交换数据。结论:本文提供了采用基于价值的SIM所需的理解。未来的研究应该更深入地研究这七个关键因素,以促进VBHC的采用,从而促进SIM实践中的价值创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信