Optimal timing for epinephrine administration in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kenta Sakamoto, Hideto Yasuda, Yutaro Shinzato, Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Takashi Moriya
{"title":"Optimal timing for epinephrine administration in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Kenta Sakamoto, Hideto Yasuda, Yutaro Shinzato, Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Takashi Moriya","doi":"10.1111/acem.15089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the appropriate timing for epinephrine administration in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), particularly those cases with nonshockable rhythms, by addressing resuscitation time bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective observational study utilizing a multicenter OHCA registry involving 95 hospitals in Japan between June 2014 and December 2020. We included patients with OHCA and nonshockable rhythms who received epinephrine during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favorable 30-day neurological status and survival, respectively. A favorable neurological outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. The time from emergency medical service (EMS) personnel contact to epinephrine administration was categorized in 5-min intervals. We used the Fine-Gray regression to calculate the time-dependent propensity score in each group. After risk set matching, we employed a generalized estimating equation (GEE) to adjust for within-patient clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36,756 patients were included in the analysis. When involving timing variables and GEE, epinephrine administration significantly affected favorable 30-day neurological status at 1-5 and 6-10 min, with risk ratios (RR; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 9.36 (1.19-73.7) and 3.67 (1.89-7.14), respectively. Epinephrine administration significantly affected 30-day survival at 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, and 16-20 min, with RRs (95% CIs) of 2.33 (1.41-3.85), 2.09 (1.65-2.65), 1.64 (1.32-2.05), or 1.70 (1.29-2.25), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epinephrine administration within 10 min of EMS personnel contact may be associated with favorable neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA and nonshockable rhythms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to clarify the appropriate timing for epinephrine administration in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), particularly those cases with nonshockable rhythms, by addressing resuscitation time bias.

Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study utilizing a multicenter OHCA registry involving 95 hospitals in Japan between June 2014 and December 2020. We included patients with OHCA and nonshockable rhythms who received epinephrine during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favorable 30-day neurological status and survival, respectively. A favorable neurological outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. The time from emergency medical service (EMS) personnel contact to epinephrine administration was categorized in 5-min intervals. We used the Fine-Gray regression to calculate the time-dependent propensity score in each group. After risk set matching, we employed a generalized estimating equation (GEE) to adjust for within-patient clustering.

Results: A total of 36,756 patients were included in the analysis. When involving timing variables and GEE, epinephrine administration significantly affected favorable 30-day neurological status at 1-5 and 6-10 min, with risk ratios (RR; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 9.36 (1.19-73.7) and 3.67 (1.89-7.14), respectively. Epinephrine administration significantly affected 30-day survival at 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, and 16-20 min, with RRs (95% CIs) of 2.33 (1.41-3.85), 2.09 (1.65-2.65), 1.64 (1.32-2.05), or 1.70 (1.29-2.25), respectively.

Conclusions: Epinephrine administration within 10 min of EMS personnel contact may be associated with favorable neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA and nonshockable rhythms.

院外心脏骤停成人患者肾上腺素给药的最佳时机:一项回顾性观察性研究。
背景:本研究旨在通过解决复苏时间偏差,阐明院外心脏骤停(OHCA)成人患者肾上腺素给药的适当时机,特别是那些具有非休克节律的患者。方法:我们在2014年6月至2020年12月期间利用日本95家医院的多中心OHCA登记处进行了一项回顾性观察研究。我们纳入了在复苏期间接受肾上腺素治疗的OHCA和非休克性心律患者。主要和次要结果分别为良好的30天神经状态和生存。良好的神经学预后被定义为大脑表现类别得分为1或2。从紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员联系到肾上腺素给药的时间以5分钟为间隔。我们使用Fine-Gray回归来计算每组中随时间变化的倾向得分。在风险集匹配后,我们采用广义估计方程(GEE)来调整患者内聚类。结果:共纳入36756例患者。当涉及时间变量和GEE时,肾上腺素给药显著影响1-5分钟和6-10分钟的30天神经状态,风险比(RR;95%置信区间[ci])分别为9.36(1.19 ~ 73.7)和3.67(1.89 ~ 7.14)。肾上腺素给药显著影响患者在1-5、6-10、11-15和16-20 min的30天生存率,相对危险度(95% ci)分别为2.33(1.41-3.85)、2.09(1.65-2.65)、1.64(1.32-2.05)和1.70(1.29-2.25)。结论:在EMS人员接触后10分钟内给药肾上腺素可能与OHCA和非震荡性心律患者良好的神经预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信