Clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis of GKRS plus TKIs versus TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases: a Markov decision model.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Szu-Hao Andrew Liu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Wei-Lun Huang, Yu-Hsien Huang, Wen-Yuh Chung, Hon-Yi Shi
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis of GKRS plus TKIs versus TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases: a Markov decision model.","authors":"Szu-Hao Andrew Liu, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Wei-Lun Huang, Yu-Hsien Huang, Wen-Yuh Chung, Hon-Yi Shi","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focuses on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, known for frequent brain metastasis. It aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of combining Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (GKRS+TKI group) versus TKIs alone (TKI group) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis in this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study characteristics of the two groups were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) model, a healthcare provider perspective, a 1-month cycle length, a 5-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 2% per year for both effectiveness and costs were adopted. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the findings. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using TreeAge Pro software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying IPTW, the GKRS+TKI group included 205 patients, and the TKI group consisted of 102 patients, with no statistically significant differences in whole confounders. The GKRS+TKI group demonstrated significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (37.5 months vs 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (55.1 months vs 30.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with the TKI group. The GKRS plus TKI strategy achieved an ICUR of $30,532.25 per quality-adjusted life year relative to the TKIs at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$33,059 (Taiwan's per capita gross domestic product).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of GKRS plus TKIs not only reduces disease recurrence and improves prognosis but also demonstrates a higher level of cost-effectiveness. These findings offer valuable guidelines for clinicians and inform healthcare authorities in optimizing resource allocation for improved medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study focuses on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, known for frequent brain metastasis. It aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of combining Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (GKRS+TKI group) versus TKIs alone (TKI group) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis in this condition.

Methods: Study characteristics of the two groups were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) model, a healthcare provider perspective, a 1-month cycle length, a 5-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 2% per year for both effectiveness and costs were adopted. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the findings. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 23.0, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using TreeAge Pro software.

Results: After applying IPTW, the GKRS+TKI group included 205 patients, and the TKI group consisted of 102 patients, with no statistically significant differences in whole confounders. The GKRS+TKI group demonstrated significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (37.5 months vs 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (55.1 months vs 30.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with the TKI group. The GKRS plus TKI strategy achieved an ICUR of $30,532.25 per quality-adjusted life year relative to the TKIs at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$33,059 (Taiwan's per capita gross domestic product).

Conclusions: The use of GKRS plus TKIs not only reduces disease recurrence and improves prognosis but also demonstrates a higher level of cost-effectiveness. These findings offer valuable guidelines for clinicians and inform healthcare authorities in optimizing resource allocation for improved medical care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信