Guadalupe Oñate, Ana Garrido, Montserrat Arnan, Helena Pomares, Ester Alonso, Mar Tormo, Marina Diaz-Beya, Susana Vives, Lurdes Zamora, Antonia Sampol, Rosa Coll, Olga Salamero, Marta Cervera, Antoni Garcia, Ferran Vall-Llovera, Sara Garcia-Avila, Joan Bargay, Xavier Ortin, Eva Iranzo, Francisca Guijarro, Marta Pratcorona, Josep F. Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra
{"title":"Diverse real-life outcomes after intensive risk-adapted therapy for 1034 AML patients from the CETLAM Group","authors":"Guadalupe Oñate, Ana Garrido, Montserrat Arnan, Helena Pomares, Ester Alonso, Mar Tormo, Marina Diaz-Beya, Susana Vives, Lurdes Zamora, Antonia Sampol, Rosa Coll, Olga Salamero, Marta Cervera, Antoni Garcia, Ferran Vall-Llovera, Sara Garcia-Avila, Joan Bargay, Xavier Ortin, Eva Iranzo, Francisca Guijarro, Marta Pratcorona, Josep F. Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia patients, it is necessary to identify patients considered fit for intensive therapy but who will perform poorly, and in whom alternative approaches deserve investigation. We analyzed 1034 fit adults ≤70 years intensively treated between 2012 and 2022 in the CETLAM group. Young adults ( ≤ 60 years) presented higher remission rates and improved survival than older adults above that age (CR 79% vs. 73%; <i>p</i> = 0.03 and 4-yr OS 53% vs. 33%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Remission and survival outcomes varied among different genetic subsets. An especially adverse genetic group included complex, monosomal karyotype, <i>TP53</i> alterations (deleted/mutated), and <i>MECOMr</i>. Transplant feasibility in this very adverse risk group was low, and OS and EFS at 4 years were 14% and 12%, in contrast to 70% and 57% in the favorable group and 38% and 32% in all other patients. We integrated clinical and genetic data into the Intensive Chemotherapy Score for AML (ICSA) with 6-risk categories with significantly different remission rates and OS, validated in another cohort of 581 AML patients from a previous CETLAM protocol. In summary, we identified groups of fit patients that benefit differently from an intensive approach which may be helpful in future treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia patients, it is necessary to identify patients considered fit for intensive therapy but who will perform poorly, and in whom alternative approaches deserve investigation. We analyzed 1034 fit adults ≤70 years intensively treated between 2012 and 2022 in the CETLAM group. Young adults ( ≤ 60 years) presented higher remission rates and improved survival than older adults above that age (CR 79% vs. 73%; p = 0.03 and 4-yr OS 53% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Remission and survival outcomes varied among different genetic subsets. An especially adverse genetic group included complex, monosomal karyotype, TP53 alterations (deleted/mutated), and MECOMr. Transplant feasibility in this very adverse risk group was low, and OS and EFS at 4 years were 14% and 12%, in contrast to 70% and 57% in the favorable group and 38% and 32% in all other patients. We integrated clinical and genetic data into the Intensive Chemotherapy Score for AML (ICSA) with 6-risk categories with significantly different remission rates and OS, validated in another cohort of 581 AML patients from a previous CETLAM protocol. In summary, we identified groups of fit patients that benefit differently from an intensive approach which may be helpful in future treatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.