Investigation of the Shear Mechanism at the Interface Between Grout and Brittle Rock: Physical Testing and PFC3D Simulation

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jinwei Fu, Hadi Haeri, Vahab Sarfarazi, Negin Rafiei, Amir Abbas Amiri, Mohammad Fatehi Marji
{"title":"Investigation of the Shear Mechanism at the Interface Between Grout and Brittle Rock: Physical Testing and PFC3D Simulation","authors":"Jinwei Fu, Hadi Haeri, Vahab Sarfarazi, Negin Rafiei, Amir Abbas Amiri, Mohammad Fatehi Marji","doi":"10.1002/nag.3944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental tests were conducted in the laboratory to investigate the shear behavior of interfaces in grout‐gypsum specimens. Various specimens were created to produce different interface configurations for testing and modeling. The tensile strength measurements indicated that grout has a strength of 1.2 MPa, while gypsum measures 0.52 MPa. For Young's modulus, grout was found to be 9 GPa, in contrast to gypsum's 4 GPa. Furthermore, the compressive strength values recorded were 13 MPa for grout and 7.9 MPa for gypsum. The fracture toughness values were found to be 0.09 MPa for grout and 0.01 MPa for gypsum. The rate of loading during the experimental tests was set at 0.05 mm/s, which was considered too low to satisfy the static loading criteria. Additionally, the laboratory tests helped calibrate the PFC modeling results, allowing for a detailed study of the shear behavior of the grout‐gypsum interfaces. The number of channels in the specimens created suitable interfaces, which influenced the shear failure mechanisms and fracturing patterns for both sample types. Tensile cracking can occur at these interfaces and may propagate throughout the channels. As the number of channels increases, the volume of injected gypsum in the specimens also rises. This increase raises the crack initiation stress, failure stress, shear stiffness, and the number of fractures. Moreover, the shear stiffness and shear strength of the grout injection channels were found to be greater than those of the gypsum channels. Overall, there was a strong correlation between the experimental and numerical results.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3944","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental tests were conducted in the laboratory to investigate the shear behavior of interfaces in grout‐gypsum specimens. Various specimens were created to produce different interface configurations for testing and modeling. The tensile strength measurements indicated that grout has a strength of 1.2 MPa, while gypsum measures 0.52 MPa. For Young's modulus, grout was found to be 9 GPa, in contrast to gypsum's 4 GPa. Furthermore, the compressive strength values recorded were 13 MPa for grout and 7.9 MPa for gypsum. The fracture toughness values were found to be 0.09 MPa for grout and 0.01 MPa for gypsum. The rate of loading during the experimental tests was set at 0.05 mm/s, which was considered too low to satisfy the static loading criteria. Additionally, the laboratory tests helped calibrate the PFC modeling results, allowing for a detailed study of the shear behavior of the grout‐gypsum interfaces. The number of channels in the specimens created suitable interfaces, which influenced the shear failure mechanisms and fracturing patterns for both sample types. Tensile cracking can occur at these interfaces and may propagate throughout the channels. As the number of channels increases, the volume of injected gypsum in the specimens also rises. This increase raises the crack initiation stress, failure stress, shear stiffness, and the number of fractures. Moreover, the shear stiffness and shear strength of the grout injection channels were found to be greater than those of the gypsum channels. Overall, there was a strong correlation between the experimental and numerical results.
浆液与脆性岩石界面剪切机理研究:物理试验与PFC3D模拟
在室内进行了试验试验,研究了浆液-石膏试样界面的剪切特性。为了测试和建模,创建了各种试样以产生不同的界面配置。抗拉强度测定结果表明,浆液的抗拉强度为1.2 MPa,石膏的抗拉强度为0.52 MPa。对于杨氏模量,发现浆液为9 GPa,而石膏为4 GPa。注浆抗压强度为13 MPa,石膏为7.9 MPa。浆料的断裂韧性值为0.09 MPa,石膏为0.01 MPa。在实验测试中,加载速率被设定为0.05 mm/s,这被认为太低,不能满足静态加载标准。此外,实验室测试有助于校准PFC建模结果,从而可以详细研究浆液-石膏界面的剪切行为。试件中通道的数量创造了合适的界面,这影响了两种试样的剪切破坏机制和破裂模式。拉伸开裂可发生在这些界面上,并可扩展到整个通道。随着通道数量的增加,试样中注入石膏的体积也随之增大。这种增加增加了裂纹起裂应力、破坏应力、剪切刚度和断裂数。注浆通道的抗剪刚度和抗剪强度均大于石膏通道。总的来说,实验结果和数值结果之间有很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信