Safety and efficacy of the automated suture system in valvular heart surgery: a multicenter, prospective registry.

Marie-Catherine Morgant, Chloé Bernard, Sebastien Gerelli, Nicolas Chavanis, Ilir Hysi, Olivier Fabre, Fabien Doguet, Elodie Berg, Olivier Bouchot
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the automated suture system in valvular heart surgery: a multicenter, prospective registry.","authors":"Marie-Catherine Morgant, Chloé Bernard, Sebastien Gerelli, Nicolas Chavanis, Ilir Hysi, Olivier Fabre, Fabien Doguet, Elodie Berg, Olivier Bouchot","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13039-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last years, the Cor-Knot<sup>®</sup> device has been increasingly used in heart valve surgery. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of valvular complications in patients who underwent valvular surgery using the Cor-Knot<sup>®</sup> device in multicentric cohorts at one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and sixty-eight patient underwent heart valve repair or replacement surgery using automated titanium suture fasteners in four cardiothoracic surgery departments between September 2018 and January 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 66.3±10.2 years. The mean Euroscore II was 3.14±5.65. Procedures were performed by right anterior mini-thoracotomy for 264 patients (71.7%) and by conventional sternotomy for 76 (20.7%). Isolated single valve surgery was most common (285 patients, 77.4%), 31 patients (8.4%) underwent isolated double valve surgery and 6 patients isolated triple valve surgery (1.6%). An associated procedure was performed in 46 patients (12.5%). Sixteen patients (4.3%) required permanent pacemaker implantation in the postoperative period. Eighteen patients died postoperatively (4.9%). Two patients had paravalvular leak ≥2 (0.5%). Mean follow-up was 14.7±7.1 months. Eight patients died during the follow-up (2.2%). Four patients had infectious endocarditis. The rate of valvular leak ≥2 was 1.5% and four patients underwent valve-related reoperation (1.2%), no reoperation was related to a valve lesion due to Cor-Knot<sup>®</sup>. There were three pacemaker implantation (0.9%) and 12 patients had NYHA>2 (3.7%). No case of metallic embolization, prosthesis thrombosis or leaflet perforation was reported during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the Cor-Knot<sup>®</sup> automated knotting system in valve surgery is not associated with an increase in the rate of paravalvular leakage, permanent pacemaker implantation or mortality postoperatively or during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"65 6","pages":"546-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13039-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the last years, the Cor-Knot® device has been increasingly used in heart valve surgery. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of valvular complications in patients who underwent valvular surgery using the Cor-Knot® device in multicentric cohorts at one-year follow-up.

Methods: Three hundred and sixty-eight patient underwent heart valve repair or replacement surgery using automated titanium suture fasteners in four cardiothoracic surgery departments between September 2018 and January 2020.

Results: The mean age was 66.3±10.2 years. The mean Euroscore II was 3.14±5.65. Procedures were performed by right anterior mini-thoracotomy for 264 patients (71.7%) and by conventional sternotomy for 76 (20.7%). Isolated single valve surgery was most common (285 patients, 77.4%), 31 patients (8.4%) underwent isolated double valve surgery and 6 patients isolated triple valve surgery (1.6%). An associated procedure was performed in 46 patients (12.5%). Sixteen patients (4.3%) required permanent pacemaker implantation in the postoperative period. Eighteen patients died postoperatively (4.9%). Two patients had paravalvular leak ≥2 (0.5%). Mean follow-up was 14.7±7.1 months. Eight patients died during the follow-up (2.2%). Four patients had infectious endocarditis. The rate of valvular leak ≥2 was 1.5% and four patients underwent valve-related reoperation (1.2%), no reoperation was related to a valve lesion due to Cor-Knot®. There were three pacemaker implantation (0.9%) and 12 patients had NYHA>2 (3.7%). No case of metallic embolization, prosthesis thrombosis or leaflet perforation was reported during follow-up.

Conclusions: The use of the Cor-Knot® automated knotting system in valve surgery is not associated with an increase in the rate of paravalvular leakage, permanent pacemaker implantation or mortality postoperatively or during follow-up.

自动缝合系统在心脏瓣膜手术中的安全性和有效性:一项多中心前瞻性注册研究。
背景:在过去的几年里,Cor-Knot®装置越来越多地用于心脏瓣膜手术。我们的目的是在一年的随访中,在多中心队列中调查使用Cor-Knot®装置进行瓣膜手术的患者的瓣膜并发症发生率。方法:2018年9月至2020年1月,368例患者在4个心胸外科使用自动钛缝合紧固件进行心脏瓣膜修复或置换手术。结果:患者平均年龄66.3±10.2岁。平均Euroscore II为3.14±5.65。264例(71.7%)患者行右前小胸切开术,76例(20.7%)患者行常规胸骨切开术。孤立性单瓣手术最多(285例,77.4%),孤立性双瓣手术31例(8.4%),孤立性三瓣手术6例(1.6%)。46例患者(12.5%)接受了相关手术。16例(4.3%)患者术后需要植入永久性起搏器。术后死亡18例(4.9%)。2例患者瓣旁漏≥2(0.5%)。平均随访14.7±7.1个月。随访期间死亡8例(2.2%)。4例患者有感染性心内膜炎。瓣漏≥2的发生率为1.5%,4例患者进行了与瓣膜相关的再手术(1.2%),无一例因Cor-Knot®引起的瓣膜病变而再次手术。起搏器植入3例(0.9%),NYHA bbb2 12例(3.7%)。随访期间无金属栓塞、假体血栓或小叶穿孔病例报告。结论:在瓣膜手术中使用Cor-Knot®自动打结系统与瓣旁漏、永久起搏器植入或术后或随访期间死亡率的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信