A practical approach to the spatial-domain calculation of nonprewhitening model observers in computed tomography

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/mp.17599
Gavin Poludniowski, Rebecca Titternes, Daniel Thor
{"title":"A practical approach to the spatial-domain calculation of nonprewhitening model observers in computed tomography","authors":"Gavin Poludniowski,&nbsp;Rebecca Titternes,&nbsp;Daniel Thor","doi":"10.1002/mp.17599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Modern reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography (CT) can exhibit nonlinear properties, including non-stationarity of noise and contrast dependence of both noise and spatial resolution. Model observers have been recommended as a tool for the task-based assessment of image quality (Samei E et al., Med Phys. 2019; 46(11): e735-e756), but the common Fourier domain approach to their calculation assumes quasi-stationarity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>A practical spatial-domain approach is proposed for the calculation of the nonprewhitening (NPW) family of model observers in CT, avoiding the disadvantages of the Fourier domain. The methodology avoids explicit estimation of a noise covariance matrix. A formula is also provided for the uncertainty on estimates of detectability index, for a given number of slices and repeat scans. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the method and provide comparisons to the conventional Fourier approach for both iterative reconstruction (IR) and a deep Learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Acquisitions were made on a Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) and reconstructed using the vendor's IR and DLR algorithms (ASiR-V and TrueFidelity). Several reconstruction kernels were investigated (Standard, Lung, and Bone for IR and Standard for DLR). An in-house developed phantom with two flat contrast levels (2 and 8 mgI/mL) and varying feature size (1–10 mm diameter) was used. Two single-energy protocols (80 and 120 kV) were investigated with two dose levels (CTDI<sub>vol</sub> = 5 and 13 mGy).</p>\n \n <p>The spatial domain calculations relied on repeated scanning, region-of-interest placement and simple operations with image matrices. No more repeat scans were utilized than required for Fourier domain estimations. Fourier domain calculations were made using techniques described in a previous publication (Thor D et al., Med Phys. 2023;50(5):2775-2786). Differences between the calculations in the two domains were assessed using the normalized root-mean-square discrepancy (NMRSD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourier domain calculations agreed closely with those in the spatial domain for all zero-strength IR reconstructions, which most closely resemble traditional filtered backprojection. The Fourier-based calculations, however, displayed higher detectability compared to those in the spatial domain for IR with strong iterative strength and for the DLR algorithm. The NRMSD remained within 10% for the NPW model observer without eye filter, but reached larger values when an eye filter was included. The formula for the uncertainty on the detectability index was validated by bootstrap estimates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A practical methodology was demonstrated for calculating NPW observers in the spatial domain. In addition to being a valuable tool for verifying the applicability of typical Fourier-based methodologies, it lends itself to routine calculations for features embedded in a phantom. Higher estimates of detectability were observed when adopting the Fourier domain methodology for IR and for a DLR algorithm, demonstrating that use of the Fourier domain can indicate greater benefit to noise suppression than suggested by spatial domain calculations. This is consistent with the results of previous authors for the Fourier domain, who have compared to human and other model observers, but not, as in this study, to the NPW model observer calculated in the spatial domain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 4","pages":"2106-2122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Modern reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography (CT) can exhibit nonlinear properties, including non-stationarity of noise and contrast dependence of both noise and spatial resolution. Model observers have been recommended as a tool for the task-based assessment of image quality (Samei E et al., Med Phys. 2019; 46(11): e735-e756), but the common Fourier domain approach to their calculation assumes quasi-stationarity.

Purpose

A practical spatial-domain approach is proposed for the calculation of the nonprewhitening (NPW) family of model observers in CT, avoiding the disadvantages of the Fourier domain. The methodology avoids explicit estimation of a noise covariance matrix. A formula is also provided for the uncertainty on estimates of detectability index, for a given number of slices and repeat scans. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the method and provide comparisons to the conventional Fourier approach for both iterative reconstruction (IR) and a deep Learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm.

Materials and methods

Acquisitions were made on a Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) and reconstructed using the vendor's IR and DLR algorithms (ASiR-V and TrueFidelity). Several reconstruction kernels were investigated (Standard, Lung, and Bone for IR and Standard for DLR). An in-house developed phantom with two flat contrast levels (2 and 8 mgI/mL) and varying feature size (1–10 mm diameter) was used. Two single-energy protocols (80 and 120 kV) were investigated with two dose levels (CTDIvol = 5 and 13 mGy).

The spatial domain calculations relied on repeated scanning, region-of-interest placement and simple operations with image matrices. No more repeat scans were utilized than required for Fourier domain estimations. Fourier domain calculations were made using techniques described in a previous publication (Thor D et al., Med Phys. 2023;50(5):2775-2786). Differences between the calculations in the two domains were assessed using the normalized root-mean-square discrepancy (NMRSD).

Results

Fourier domain calculations agreed closely with those in the spatial domain for all zero-strength IR reconstructions, which most closely resemble traditional filtered backprojection. The Fourier-based calculations, however, displayed higher detectability compared to those in the spatial domain for IR with strong iterative strength and for the DLR algorithm. The NRMSD remained within 10% for the NPW model observer without eye filter, but reached larger values when an eye filter was included. The formula for the uncertainty on the detectability index was validated by bootstrap estimates.

Conclusion

A practical methodology was demonstrated for calculating NPW observers in the spatial domain. In addition to being a valuable tool for verifying the applicability of typical Fourier-based methodologies, it lends itself to routine calculations for features embedded in a phantom. Higher estimates of detectability were observed when adopting the Fourier domain methodology for IR and for a DLR algorithm, demonstrating that use of the Fourier domain can indicate greater benefit to noise suppression than suggested by spatial domain calculations. This is consistent with the results of previous authors for the Fourier domain, who have compared to human and other model observers, but not, as in this study, to the NPW model observer calculated in the spatial domain.

Abstract Image

一种实用的计算机断层扫描中非预白化模型观测器的空域计算方法。
背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)的现代重建算法可能表现出非线性特性,包括噪声的非平稳性以及噪声和空间分辨率的对比度依赖性。模型观察者被推荐作为基于任务的图像质量评估工具(Samei E等人,Med Phys. 2019;46(11): e735-e756),但其计算的普通傅立叶域方法假定为准平稳。目的:提出了一种实用的空域方法来计算CT中模型观测器的非预白化(NPW)族,避免了傅里叶域的缺点。该方法避免了对噪声协方差矩阵的显式估计。给出了给定切片数和重复扫描数下可探测性指数估计的不确定度公式。这项工作的目的是演示该方法,并与传统的傅里叶方法进行迭代重建(IR)和基于深度学习的重建(DLR)算法的比较。材料和方法:在Revolution CT扫描仪(GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA)上进行采集,并使用供应商的IR和DLR算法(ASiR-V和truefidfidelity)进行重建。研究了几种重建核(标准、肺和骨用于IR和标准用于DLR)。使用内部开发的具有两个平面对比度水平(2和8 mgI/mL)和不同特征尺寸(1-10 mm直径)的幻影。研究了两种单能量方案(80和120千伏),两种剂量水平(CTDIvol = 5和13 mGy)。空间域计算依赖于重复扫描、兴趣区域放置和简单的图像矩阵运算。没有更多的重复扫描使用比所需的傅里叶域估计。傅里叶域计算使用先前出版物中描述的技术进行(Thor D et al., Med Phys. 2023;50(5):2775-2786)。使用标准化均方根差异(NMRSD)评估两个域计算之间的差异。结果:傅里叶域计算与所有零强度红外重建的空间域计算非常一致,这与传统的滤波反投影最相似。然而,对于迭代强度强的红外和DLR算法,基于傅里叶的计算比空间域的计算显示出更高的可检测性。NPW模型中不加滤镜的观察者的NRMSD保持在10%以内,而加滤镜的观察者的NRMSD达到了更大的值。通过自举估计验证了可探测性指标的不确定度公式。结论:展示了一种在空间域中计算NPW观察者的实用方法。除了作为验证典型的基于傅里叶的方法的适用性的有价值的工具之外,它还可以用于对嵌入在幻像中的特征进行常规计算。当采用傅里叶域方法进行红外和DLR算法时,观察到更高的可检测性估计,这表明使用傅里叶域可以表明比空间域计算更有利于噪声抑制。这与之前作者在傅里叶域的研究结果是一致的,他们将傅里叶域与人类和其他模型观察者进行了比较,但与在空间域中计算的NPW模型观察者不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信