Expressive Writing About One's Trauma Increases Accessibility of Cannabis Information in Memory Among Trauma-Exposed Individuals.

Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26828/cannabis/2024/000262
Sarah DeGrace, Philip G Tibbo, Maya A Pilin, Marvin D Krank, Roisin M O'Connor, Jeffrey Wardell, Matthew T Keough, Thomas Snooks, Sarah-Jeanne Trottier, Sherry H Stewart
{"title":"Expressive Writing About One's Trauma Increases Accessibility of Cannabis Information in Memory Among Trauma-Exposed Individuals.","authors":"Sarah DeGrace, Philip G Tibbo, Maya A Pilin, Marvin D Krank, Roisin M O'Connor, Jeffrey Wardell, Matthew T Keough, Thomas Snooks, Sarah-Jeanne Trottier, Sherry H Stewart","doi":"10.26828/cannabis/2024/000262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trauma survivors are more likely than others to use cannabis, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with cannabis use disorder (CUD). Automatic memory associations between trauma reminders and cannabis use have been suggested as contributing mechanisms. These associations can be studied experimentally by manipulating trauma cue exposure in a cue-reactivity paradigm (CRP) and examining effects on the accessibility of cannabis information in memory in trauma survivors with and without PTSD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cannabis users with trauma histories (<i>N</i> = 202) completed a PTSD measure (PTSD Checklist-5) and were randomized to a trauma or neutral expressive writing task as an online CRP. Next, participants completed a cue-behavior word association task, which involved presentation of a series of ambiguous cue words to which participants provided the first word that came to mind. Some of these ambiguous cues pertained to cannabis (e.g., <i>weed, pot</i>) and some to other substances (e.g., <i>blow, shot</i>). This task was scored by two independent raters. Linear regression models tested the hypothesized main and interactive effects of CRP condition (trauma, neutral) and PTSD group (probable PTSD, no PTSD) on the number of cannabis and other substance responses generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main effects of CRP condition were found for cannabis responses (<i>b</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> = .048; trauma > neutral) but not other substance responses. Unexpectedly, no main effects or interactions of PTSD group were observed for either outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cannabis users with trauma histories, writing about one's trauma specifically activates greater accessibility of cannabis-related information in memory, regardless of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72520,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","volume":"7 3","pages":"61-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2024/000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Trauma survivors are more likely than others to use cannabis, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with cannabis use disorder (CUD). Automatic memory associations between trauma reminders and cannabis use have been suggested as contributing mechanisms. These associations can be studied experimentally by manipulating trauma cue exposure in a cue-reactivity paradigm (CRP) and examining effects on the accessibility of cannabis information in memory in trauma survivors with and without PTSD.

Method: Cannabis users with trauma histories (N = 202) completed a PTSD measure (PTSD Checklist-5) and were randomized to a trauma or neutral expressive writing task as an online CRP. Next, participants completed a cue-behavior word association task, which involved presentation of a series of ambiguous cue words to which participants provided the first word that came to mind. Some of these ambiguous cues pertained to cannabis (e.g., weed, pot) and some to other substances (e.g., blow, shot). This task was scored by two independent raters. Linear regression models tested the hypothesized main and interactive effects of CRP condition (trauma, neutral) and PTSD group (probable PTSD, no PTSD) on the number of cannabis and other substance responses generated.

Results: Main effects of CRP condition were found for cannabis responses (b = 0.41, p = .048; trauma > neutral) but not other substance responses. Unexpectedly, no main effects or interactions of PTSD group were observed for either outcome.

Conclusions: In cannabis users with trauma histories, writing about one's trauma specifically activates greater accessibility of cannabis-related information in memory, regardless of PTSD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信