Factors contributing to non-compliance with active physiotherapy guidelines among chronic low back pain patients in India.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2024.3217
G Shankar Ganesh, Abdur Raheem Khan, Ashfaque Khan
{"title":"Factors contributing to non-compliance with active physiotherapy guidelines among chronic low back pain patients in India.","authors":"G Shankar Ganesh, Abdur Raheem Khan, Ashfaque Khan","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physiotherapists exhibit different degrees of adherence to clinical guidelines for low back pain (LBP). The preferences and expectations of their patients significantly influence physiotherapists' adherence to these guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive analysis of the patients' perspectives, which can identify the factors that prevent the implementation of an active approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients suffering from non-specific chronic LBP (CLBP). We transcribed the semi-structured interviews verbatim and conducted an inductive thematic analysis to uncover themes related to the participants' expectations and experiences of consultations with physiotherapists for CLBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we interviewed thirty-three individuals, with 14 women and 19 men (mean age 53 + 12 years). Our thematic analysis discovered six overarching themes that are relevant to patients' expectations and experiences. We identified several sub-themes under the \"physiotherapist-related factors\" and \"patient-related factors\" themes. Additional themes recognized were guideline-related factors, institution-related factors, healthcare-related factors, and health information. A significant number of participants expressed dissatisfaction with the short timeframe allocated by the physiotherapist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple participants expressed dissatisfaction with their experience, particularly about the quality of explanations and the nature of the exercises provided. This emphasizes the importance of patient education, and physiotherapists should consider suggesting active interventions that the family, society, and culture can more easily accept. Accordingly, the formulation of future guidelines for nations like India should take into account these patient expectations and perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"155-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physiotherapists exhibit different degrees of adherence to clinical guidelines for low back pain (LBP). The preferences and expectations of their patients significantly influence physiotherapists' adherence to these guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive analysis of the patients' perspectives, which can identify the factors that prevent the implementation of an active approach.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients suffering from non-specific chronic LBP (CLBP). We transcribed the semi-structured interviews verbatim and conducted an inductive thematic analysis to uncover themes related to the participants' expectations and experiences of consultations with physiotherapists for CLBP.

Results: In total, we interviewed thirty-three individuals, with 14 women and 19 men (mean age 53 + 12 years). Our thematic analysis discovered six overarching themes that are relevant to patients' expectations and experiences. We identified several sub-themes under the "physiotherapist-related factors" and "patient-related factors" themes. Additional themes recognized were guideline-related factors, institution-related factors, healthcare-related factors, and health information. A significant number of participants expressed dissatisfaction with the short timeframe allocated by the physiotherapist.

Conclusions: Multiple participants expressed dissatisfaction with their experience, particularly about the quality of explanations and the nature of the exercises provided. This emphasizes the importance of patient education, and physiotherapists should consider suggesting active interventions that the family, society, and culture can more easily accept. Accordingly, the formulation of future guidelines for nations like India should take into account these patient expectations and perspectives.

导致印度慢性腰痛患者不遵守积极物理治疗指南的因素
物理治疗师对下腰痛(LBP)的临床指导方针表现出不同程度的遵守。患者的偏好和期望显著影响物理治疗师对这些指导方针的遵守。因此,对患者的观点进行全面分析是至关重要的,这可以确定阻碍积极方法实施的因素。方法:对非特异性慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者进行半结构化访谈。我们逐字记录了半结构化访谈,并进行了归纳性主题分析,以揭示与参与者对CLBP物理治疗师咨询的期望和经验相关的主题。结果:我们总共采访了33个人,其中女性14人,男性19人(平均年龄53 + 12岁)。我们的专题分析发现了六个与患者期望和经历相关的总体主题。我们在“物理治疗师相关因素”和“患者相关因素”主题下确定了几个子主题。确认的其他主题是与准则有关的因素、与机构有关的因素、与保健有关的因素和健康信息。相当数量的参与者对物理治疗师分配的短时间表示不满。结论:许多参与者对他们的经历表示不满,特别是对解释的质量和所提供的练习的性质。这强调了患者教育的重要性,物理治疗师应该考虑提出家庭、社会和文化更容易接受的积极干预措施。因此,为像印度这样的国家制定未来的指导方针时,应该考虑到这些患者的期望和观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信