Traction-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using the clip-with-thread method for small gastric subepithelial lesions: Randomized controlled trial (with video).
{"title":"Traction-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using the clip-with-thread method for small gastric subepithelial lesions: Randomized controlled trial (with video).","authors":"Yosuke Minoda, Yusuke Suzuki, Haruei Ogino, Shuzaburo Nagatomo, Xiaopeng Bai, Mitsuru Esaki, Masafumi Wada, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Yoshitaka Hata, Nao Fujimori, Shinya Umekita, Daisuke Tsurumaru, Mitsuhiko Ota, Eiji Oki, Eikichi Ihara, Yoshihiro Ogawa","doi":"10.1111/den.14977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) is the gold standard for diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs), but diagnosing lesions smaller than 20 mm remains challenging. We developed traction-assisted EUS-FNB (TA-EUS-FNB) using the clip-with-thread method to enhance diagnostic accuracy by stabilizing the lesion and providing counter-traction for easier needle access. This study evaluates the effectiveness of TA-EUS-FNB in diagnosing small gastric SELs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled cross-over trial (August 2019-November 2022), 30 patients with gastric SELs <20 mm were randomized to undergo TA-EUS-FNB or conventional EUS-FNB. Each patient underwent four punctures, two per method. The primary end-point was the adequate tissue sampling rate for both techniques. Secondary end-points included diagnostic yield and performance (sensitivity and specificity) in distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from non-GISTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor size was 15.0 mm, with diagnoses comprising GISTs (n = 15, 50%), leiomyomas (n = 8, 26.7%), schwannomas (n = 2, 6.7%), aberrant pancreas (n = 3, 10%), and inflammation (n = 2, 6.7%). TA-EUS-FNB demonstrated a significantly higher adequate-tissue sampling rate (90% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.035) and diagnostic yield (86.7% vs. 63.3%, P = 0.037) than conventional EUS-FNB. Sensitivity (86.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.1-96.3% vs. 66.7%, 95% CI 41.7-84.8%; P = 0.20) and specificity (100%, 95% CI 79.6-100% vs. 100%, 95% CI 79.6-100%) were comparable between the methods. No adverse events were observed in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TA-EUS-FNB demonstrated superior tissue sampling rates and diagnostic yield for SELs <20 mm compared to conventional EUS-FNB, making it a viable option. Controlling lesion mobility is essential for successful EUS-FNB in small SELs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) is the gold standard for diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs), but diagnosing lesions smaller than 20 mm remains challenging. We developed traction-assisted EUS-FNB (TA-EUS-FNB) using the clip-with-thread method to enhance diagnostic accuracy by stabilizing the lesion and providing counter-traction for easier needle access. This study evaluates the effectiveness of TA-EUS-FNB in diagnosing small gastric SELs.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled cross-over trial (August 2019-November 2022), 30 patients with gastric SELs <20 mm were randomized to undergo TA-EUS-FNB or conventional EUS-FNB. Each patient underwent four punctures, two per method. The primary end-point was the adequate tissue sampling rate for both techniques. Secondary end-points included diagnostic yield and performance (sensitivity and specificity) in distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from non-GISTs.
Results: The mean tumor size was 15.0 mm, with diagnoses comprising GISTs (n = 15, 50%), leiomyomas (n = 8, 26.7%), schwannomas (n = 2, 6.7%), aberrant pancreas (n = 3, 10%), and inflammation (n = 2, 6.7%). TA-EUS-FNB demonstrated a significantly higher adequate-tissue sampling rate (90% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.035) and diagnostic yield (86.7% vs. 63.3%, P = 0.037) than conventional EUS-FNB. Sensitivity (86.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.1-96.3% vs. 66.7%, 95% CI 41.7-84.8%; P = 0.20) and specificity (100%, 95% CI 79.6-100% vs. 100%, 95% CI 79.6-100%) were comparable between the methods. No adverse events were observed in the study.
Conclusion: TA-EUS-FNB demonstrated superior tissue sampling rates and diagnostic yield for SELs <20 mm compared to conventional EUS-FNB, making it a viable option. Controlling lesion mobility is essential for successful EUS-FNB in small SELs.
目的:内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA/B)是诊断胃上皮下病变(SELs)的金标准,但诊断小于20mm的病变仍然具有挑战性。我们开发了牵引辅助EUS-FNB (TA-EUS-FNB),采用夹线方法,通过稳定病变和提供反牵引使针头更容易进入来提高诊断准确性。本研究评价TA-EUS-FNB诊断胃小SELs的有效性。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照交叉试验中(2019年8月- 2022年11月),30例胃SELs患者。结果:平均肿瘤大小为15.0 mm,诊断包括gist (n = 15, 50%)、平滑肌瘤(n = 8, 26.7%)、神经鞘瘤(n = 2, 6.7%)、胰腺异常(n = 3, 10%)和炎症(n = 2, 6.7%)。TA-EUS-FNB的充分组织采样率(90% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.035)和诊断率(86.7% vs. 63.3%, P = 0.037)明显高于常规EUS-FNB。敏感性(86.7%,95%置信区间[CI] 62.1-96.3% vs. 66.7%, 95% CI 41.7-84.8%;P = 0.20)和特异性(100%,95% CI 79.6-100% vs. 100%, 95% CI 79.6-100%)在两种方法之间具有可比性。本研究未观察到不良事件。结论:TA-EUS-FNB对SELs具有较高的组织采样率和诊断率