Pacemaker Implantation After Tricuspid Valve Surgery at a High-Volume Regional Reference Center.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.022
Whitney Fu, Catherine M Wagner, Alexander A Brescia, Robert B Hawkins, Matthew A Romano, Gorav Ailawadi, Steven F Bolling
{"title":"Pacemaker Implantation After Tricuspid Valve Surgery at a High-Volume Regional Reference Center.","authors":"Whitney Fu, Catherine M Wagner, Alexander A Brescia, Robert B Hawkins, Matthew A Romano, Gorav Ailawadi, Steven F Bolling","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation after tricuspid valve (TV) operation is thought to be high, with some studies quoting rates of 20% to 30%. We identified the rate of pacemaker implantation after TV operation at a high-volume regional reference center to better characterize the contemporary risk of pacemaker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult patients without preexisting pacemakers undergoing TV operation from 2011 to 2022 were included. Patients were categorized by type of tricuspid operation and concomitant procedures. Bivariable analysis and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to compare outcomes and to identify covariates independently associated with pacemaker implantation and long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1346 patients with no history of pacemaker underwent TV operation. The overall rate of pacemaker was 11% (142/1346), with a 9.2% (113/1235) pacemaker rate with TV repair vs 26% (29/111) rate with TV replacement (<i>P</i> < .001). For isolated TV operations, permanent pacemaker rate was 3.7% (5/135) for repairs vs 23% (18/79) for replacement (<i>P</i> < .001). Need for pacemaker implantation varied significantly by type of operation. Adjusting for patient and operative characteristics, combined aortic root and valve operation, combined mitral and tricuspid surgery, longer cross-clamp time, and tricuspid replacement were independent risk factors for pacemaker. There was no difference in long-term mortality between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large data series, the rate of pacemaker with any TV operation was 11% and ranged from 0% to 33% according to concomitant procedures. Contemporary risk of pacemaker after TV operation at a high-volume center may be lower than previously thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"754-758"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation after tricuspid valve (TV) operation is thought to be high, with some studies quoting rates of 20% to 30%. We identified the rate of pacemaker implantation after TV operation at a high-volume regional reference center to better characterize the contemporary risk of pacemaker.

Methods: All adult patients without preexisting pacemakers undergoing TV operation from 2011 to 2022 were included. Patients were categorized by type of tricuspid operation and concomitant procedures. Bivariable analysis and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to compare outcomes and to identify covariates independently associated with pacemaker implantation and long-term mortality.

Results: A total of 1346 patients with no history of pacemaker underwent TV operation. The overall rate of pacemaker was 11% (142/1346), with a 9.2% (113/1235) pacemaker rate with TV repair vs 26% (29/111) rate with TV replacement (P < .001). For isolated TV operations, permanent pacemaker rate was 3.7% (5/135) for repairs vs 23% (18/79) for replacement (P < .001). Need for pacemaker implantation varied significantly by type of operation. Adjusting for patient and operative characteristics, combined aortic root and valve operation, combined mitral and tricuspid surgery, longer cross-clamp time, and tricuspid replacement were independent risk factors for pacemaker. There was no difference in long-term mortality between the groups.

Conclusions: In this large data series, the rate of pacemaker with any TV operation was 11% and ranged from 0% to 33% according to concomitant procedures. Contemporary risk of pacemaker after TV operation at a high-volume center may be lower than previously thought.

三尖瓣手术后起搏器植入在大容量区域参考中心。
背景:三尖瓣(TV)手术后永久起搏器植入率被认为很高,一些研究引用的比率为20%至30%。我们在一个高容量的区域性参考中心确定了电视手术后起搏器植入率,以更好地表征起搏器的当代风险。方法:纳入2011 ~ 2022年接受电视手术的成人无起搏器患者。患者按三尖瓣手术类型及伴随手术进行分类。采用双变量分析、多变量逻辑回归和Cox回归来比较结果,并确定与起搏器植入和长期死亡率独立相关的协变量。结果:1346例无起搏器病史的患者行电视手术。起搏器的总起搏器率为11%(142/1346),其中电视机修理组的起搏器率为9.2%(113/1235),而更换电视机组的起搏器率为26% (29/111)(P < 0.001)。在孤立电视手术中,永久性起搏器修复率为3.7%(5/135),更换率为23% (18/79)(P < 0.001)。不同手术类型对起搏器植入的需求差异显著。调整患者和手术特点后,主动脉根部和瓣膜联合手术、二尖瓣和三尖瓣联合手术、更长的交叉夹钳时间和三尖瓣置换术是起搏器的独立危险因素。两组之间的长期死亡率没有差异。结论:在这个大数据系列中,任何电视手术的起搏器率为11%,根据伴随手术的情况,起搏器率为0%至33%。高容量中心电视手术后起搏器的当代风险可能比以前认为的要低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信