"Consider-the-Opposite" Debiasing to Improve Self-Assessment Accuracy in Anesthesiology Trainees: A Prospective Pretest-Posttest Study.

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A&A practice Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001902
Lukas H Matern, Keith Baker, Daniel Saddawi-Konefka
{"title":"\"Consider-the-Opposite\" Debiasing to Improve Self-Assessment Accuracy in Anesthesiology Trainees: A Prospective Pretest-Posttest Study.","authors":"Lukas H Matern, Keith Baker, Daniel Saddawi-Konefka","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate self-assessments enhance learning and patient care, yet resident physicians self-assess poorly. We therefore tested the effects of a consider-the-opposite (CTO) cognitive debiasing technique on self-assessment accuracy among anesthesiology residents. Trainees self-assessed their technical skills and communication/leadership abilities, then completed a CTO intervention before repeating self-assessments. Postintervention, technical skills self-assessment accuracy remained unchanged (1.00%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.46% to 10.0%). Communication/leadership self-assessment accuracy improved by 5.63% (95% CI 0.001%-16.9%), but this did not meet our prespecified threshold for a meaningful effect. These findings do not suggest a compelling effect of this CTO intervention on self-assessment accuracy among trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":56372,"journal":{"name":"A&A practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"e01902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate self-assessments enhance learning and patient care, yet resident physicians self-assess poorly. We therefore tested the effects of a consider-the-opposite (CTO) cognitive debiasing technique on self-assessment accuracy among anesthesiology residents. Trainees self-assessed their technical skills and communication/leadership abilities, then completed a CTO intervention before repeating self-assessments. Postintervention, technical skills self-assessment accuracy remained unchanged (1.00%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.46% to 10.0%). Communication/leadership self-assessment accuracy improved by 5.63% (95% CI 0.001%-16.9%), but this did not meet our prespecified threshold for a meaningful effect. These findings do not suggest a compelling effect of this CTO intervention on self-assessment accuracy among trainees.

“考虑反面”去偏以提高麻醉学员自我评估准确性:一项前瞻性前测后测研究。
准确的自我评估提高学习和病人护理,但住院医师自我评估差。因此,我们在麻醉科住院医师中测试了反向考虑(CTO)认知去偏技术对自我评估准确性的影响。学员自我评估他们的技术技能和沟通/领导能力,然后在重复自我评估之前完成CTO干预。干预后,技术技能自我评估的准确率保持不变(1.00%,95%可信区间[CI], -7.46% ~ 10.0%)。沟通/领导力自我评估的准确性提高了5.63% (95% CI 0.001%-16.9%),但这并没有达到我们预先设定的有意义效果的阈值。这些发现并不表明这种CTO干预对受训者自我评估准确性有令人信服的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
A&A practice
A&A practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信