Dapagliflozin Mediates the Protective Effect against atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and the Reduction in All-Cause Mortality Risk.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xuehong Hu, Chen Tan, Xingpeng Liu, Na Zhang, Fengnan Wang, Zhijuan Wang
{"title":"Dapagliflozin Mediates the Protective Effect against atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and the Reduction in All-Cause Mortality Risk.","authors":"Xuehong Hu, Chen Tan, Xingpeng Liu, Na Zhang, Fengnan Wang, Zhijuan Wang","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2024.12.n2701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between dapagliflozin and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), along with its impact on all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this meta-analysis conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to June 2021. We focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared dapagliflozin with a placebo. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was utilized to assess the reliability of the findings. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included nine studies, encompassing a total of 30,235 patients. The findings indicated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of AF / AFL in the dapagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (relative risk (RR) = 0.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.59 to 0.89, p=0.002), although this result was not corroborated by TSA. The occurrences of AF and all-cause mortality were also lower in the dapagliflozin group than in the placebo group (RR = 0.71, 95 % CI = 0.57 to 0.89, p=0.003 and RR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.82 to 0.98, p=0.02, respectively). However, TSA did not confirm these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dapagliflozin appears to offer a significant protective effect against AF / AFL and may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with DM. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings due to the lack of confirmation by TSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"64 12","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.12.n2701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between dapagliflozin and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), along with its impact on all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Material and methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this meta-analysis conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to June 2021. We focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared dapagliflozin with a placebo. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was utilized to assess the reliability of the findings. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager software.

Results: The final analysis included nine studies, encompassing a total of 30,235 patients. The findings indicated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of AF / AFL in the dapagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (relative risk (RR) = 0.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.59 to 0.89, p=0.002), although this result was not corroborated by TSA. The occurrences of AF and all-cause mortality were also lower in the dapagliflozin group than in the placebo group (RR = 0.71, 95 % CI = 0.57 to 0.89, p=0.003 and RR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.82 to 0.98, p=0.02, respectively). However, TSA did not confirm these outcomes.

Conclusion: Dapagliflozin appears to offer a significant protective effect against AF / AFL and may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with DM. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings due to the lack of confirmation by TSA.

达格列净对房颤/心房扑动的保护作用和全因死亡风险的降低
目的:本研究旨在探讨达格列净与糖尿病(DM)患者心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)发生率的关系及其对全因死亡率的影响。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,本荟萃分析在PubMed、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中进行了全面搜索,截止到2021年6月。我们将重点放在比较达格列净和安慰剂的随机对照试验(rct)上。采用试验序列分析(TSA)来评估研究结果的可靠性。所有统计分析均使用Review Manager软件进行。结果:最终分析包括9项研究,共计30235例患者。研究结果显示,与安慰剂组相比,达格列净组AF / AFL的发生率有统计学意义上的显著降低(相对危险度(RR) = 0.73, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.59 ~ 0.89, p=0.002),尽管这一结果没有得到TSA的证实。达格列净组AF的发生率和全因死亡率也低于安慰剂组(RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57 ~ 0.89, p=0.003; RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 ~ 0.98, p=0.02)。然而,TSA并没有证实这些结果。结论:达格列净似乎对AF / AFL具有显著的保护作用,并可能降低DM患者全因死亡率的风险。然而,由于缺乏TSA的证实,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kardiologiya
Kardiologiya 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: “Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology. As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields. The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords). “Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus. The Journal''s primary objectives Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers. Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums; Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication; Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community; Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信