Measuring a family sense of coherence: a rasch-based study extending dyadic data analyses.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marie-Louise Möllerberg, Kristofer Årestedt, Peter Hagell, Jeanette Melin
{"title":"Measuring a family sense of coherence: a rasch-based study extending dyadic data analyses.","authors":"Marie-Louise Möllerberg, Kristofer Årestedt, Peter Hagell, Jeanette Melin","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01639-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family sense of coherence (FSOC) seems to reduce distress in the family and promote the well-being of the family. Therefore, getting accurate measurements for families with long-term illnesses is of particular interest. This study explores dyadic data analysis from the dyadic- and single-informant perspectives, and the measurement properties of the FSOC-S12 according to the Rasch model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Racked and stacked data from 151 dyads were analyzed according to the polytomous Rasch model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, both the dyadic- and single-informant perspectives (i.e., racked and stacked data set-ups) showed measurement properties with minor deviations from the Rasch model according to fit statistics. However, most items had disordered thresholds and some problems with local dependency. Item hierarchies were similar in both set-ups and there was no differential item functioning (DIF) by role from the dyadic informant perspective. Four items showed DIF by informant role in the single-informant perspective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach to handling dyadic data has shown both strengths and limitations in the evaluation of FSOC-S12, and the understanding of FSOC as a construct from the family's view of the family's ability as a whole (dyadic-informant perspective) and patient's and family member's separate views of the family's ability as a whole (single-informant perspective).</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01639-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family sense of coherence (FSOC) seems to reduce distress in the family and promote the well-being of the family. Therefore, getting accurate measurements for families with long-term illnesses is of particular interest. This study explores dyadic data analysis from the dyadic- and single-informant perspectives, and the measurement properties of the FSOC-S12 according to the Rasch model.

Methods: Racked and stacked data from 151 dyads were analyzed according to the polytomous Rasch model.

Results: Notably, both the dyadic- and single-informant perspectives (i.e., racked and stacked data set-ups) showed measurement properties with minor deviations from the Rasch model according to fit statistics. However, most items had disordered thresholds and some problems with local dependency. Item hierarchies were similar in both set-ups and there was no differential item functioning (DIF) by role from the dyadic informant perspective. Four items showed DIF by informant role in the single-informant perspective.

Conclusions: Our approach to handling dyadic data has shown both strengths and limitations in the evaluation of FSOC-S12, and the understanding of FSOC as a construct from the family's view of the family's ability as a whole (dyadic-informant perspective) and patient's and family member's separate views of the family's ability as a whole (single-informant perspective).

测量家庭的连贯性:一项基于拉什的扩展二元数据分析的研究。
背景:家庭连贯感(FSOC)似乎可以减少家庭的痛苦,促进家庭的幸福。因此,对患有长期疾病的家庭进行精确的测量是非常重要的。本研究从二元和单一信息提供者的角度探讨了二元数据分析,并根据Rasch模型探讨了FSOC-S12的测量特性。方法:采用多晶Rasch模型对151对染色体的累加和叠加数据进行分析。结果:值得注意的是,根据拟合统计,双输入和单输入视角(即,累加和堆叠数据设置)都显示出与Rasch模型有轻微偏差的测量属性。但是,大多数项目的阈值混乱,并且存在一些局部依赖问题。在两种设置中,项目层次结构相似,并且从二元信息提供者的角度来看,没有不同角色的差异项目功能(DIF)。在单举报人视角下,有四个项目显示了举报人角色的DIF。结论:我们处理二元数据的方法显示了FSOC- s12评估的优势和局限性,以及从家庭整体能力的角度(二元-举报人视角)和患者和家庭成员对家庭整体能力的单独观点(单一举报人视角)来理解FSOC作为一个结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信