Outcomes Associated With Care Models for Neonates With Complex Medical Needs: A Scoping Review to Support Program Evaluation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nicole Loewen, Manon Ranger, Emily Kieran
{"title":"Outcomes Associated With Care Models for Neonates With Complex Medical Needs: A Scoping Review to Support Program Evaluation.","authors":"Nicole Loewen, Manon Ranger, Emily Kieran","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonates with complex medical needs (NCMNs) are a small proportion of neonatal intensive care unit admissions but are high healthcare utilizers. Since 2018, NCMNs at our hospital have been cared for by the Neonatal Complex Care Team. This model has yet to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To inform the evaluation of our care model, we examined literature on care practices for the management of NCMNs and utilized that to define outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched. Inclusion dates: January 1, 1993, until July 15, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was used. The population was neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, the concept was models of care, and the context was medical complexity. Two reviewers performed the title/abstract screening and full-text review. A total of 148 articles were screened, 17 fully reviewed, and 5 articles included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data extraction was completed by one reviewer utilizing resources from the Joanna Briggs Institute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Care practices ranged from structured discharge meetings with families to an inpatient care model. Few reported new clinical models, and long-term health outcome data were limited. Multidisciplinary care teams emerged as crucial to in-hospital care and smooth discharge. Length of stay and readmission were identified as key outcomes for clinical program evaluation.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>There is limited literature on this topic; however, we identified themes and outcomes that are useful for clinical program evaluation. Long-term evaluation of novel models of care is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonates with complex medical needs (NCMNs) are a small proportion of neonatal intensive care unit admissions but are high healthcare utilizers. Since 2018, NCMNs at our hospital have been cared for by the Neonatal Complex Care Team. This model has yet to be evaluated.

Purpose: To inform the evaluation of our care model, we examined literature on care practices for the management of NCMNs and utilized that to define outcome measures.

Data sources: MEDLINE and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched. Inclusion dates: January 1, 1993, until July 15, 2023.

Study selection: The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was used. The population was neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, the concept was models of care, and the context was medical complexity. Two reviewers performed the title/abstract screening and full-text review. A total of 148 articles were screened, 17 fully reviewed, and 5 articles included.

Data extraction: Data extraction was completed by one reviewer utilizing resources from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results: Care practices ranged from structured discharge meetings with families to an inpatient care model. Few reported new clinical models, and long-term health outcome data were limited. Multidisciplinary care teams emerged as crucial to in-hospital care and smooth discharge. Length of stay and readmission were identified as key outcomes for clinical program evaluation.

Implications for practice and research: There is limited literature on this topic; however, we identified themes and outcomes that are useful for clinical program evaluation. Long-term evaluation of novel models of care is needed.

有复杂医疗需求的新生儿护理模式的相关结果:支持方案评估的范围综述
背景:有复杂医疗需求的新生儿(NCMNs)是新生儿重症监护病房入院的一小部分,但却是高医疗利用率。自2018年起,我院新生儿综合护理组对新生儿进行护理。这种模式还有待评估。目的:为了评估我们的护理模式,我们查阅了关于NCMNs管理的护理实践的文献,并利用这些文献来定义结果测量。数据来源:检索MEDLINE和护理及相关健康文献累积索引。纳入日期:1993年1月1日至2023年7月15日。研究选择:使用PRISMA扩展来进行范围审查。人口是新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿,概念是护理模式,背景是医疗复杂性。两位审稿人进行标题/摘要筛选和全文审查。共筛选文章148篇,全面审查17篇,纳入5篇。数据提取:数据提取由一位审稿人利用Joanna Briggs研究所的资源完成。结果:护理实践范围从与家庭的结构化出院会议到住院护理模式。很少有新的临床模型报道,长期健康结果数据有限。多学科护理团队对住院护理和顺利出院至关重要。住院时间和再入院被确定为临床项目评估的关键结果。对实践和研究的启示:关于这一主题的文献有限;然而,我们确定了对临床项目评估有用的主题和结果。需要对新型护理模式进行长期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信