Speech-mediated manipulation of da Vinci surgical system for continuous surgical flow.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5
Young Gyun Kim, Jae Woo Shim, Geunwu Gimm, Seongjoon Kang, Wounsuk Rhee, Jong Hyeon Lee, Byeong Soo Kim, Dan Yoon, Myungjoon Kim, Minwoo Cho, Sungwan Kim
{"title":"Speech-mediated manipulation of da Vinci surgical system for continuous surgical flow.","authors":"Young Gyun Kim, Jae Woo Shim, Geunwu Gimm, Seongjoon Kang, Wounsuk Rhee, Jong Hyeon Lee, Byeong Soo Kim, Dan Yoon, Myungjoon Kim, Minwoo Cho, Sungwan Kim","doi":"10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advent of robot-assisted surgery, user-friendly technologies have been applied to the da Vinci surgical system (dVSS), and their efficacy has been validated in worldwide surgical fields. However, further improvements are required to the traditional manipulation methods, which cannot control an endoscope and surgical instruments simultaneously. This study proposes a speech recognition control interface (SRCI) for controlling the endoscope via speech commands while manipulating surgical instruments to replace the traditional method. The usability-focused comparisons of the newly proposed SRCI-based and the traditional manipulation method were conducted based on ISO 9241-11. 20 surgeons and 18 novices evaluated both manipulation methods through the line tracking task (LTT) and sea spike pod task (SSPT). After the tasks, they responded to the globally reliable questionnaires: after-scenario questionnaire (ASQ), system usability scale (SUS), and NASA task load index (TLX). The completion times in the LTT and SSPT using the proposed method were 44.72% and 26.59% respectively less than the traditional method, which shows statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The overall results of ASQ, SUS, and NASA TLX were positive for the proposed method, especially substantial reductions in the workloads such as physical demands and efforts (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The proposed speech-mediated method can be a candidate suitable for the simultaneous manipulation of an endoscope and surgical instruments in dVSS-used robotic surgery. Therefore, it can replace the traditional method when controlling the endoscope while manipulating the surgical instruments, which contributes to enabling the continuous surgical flow in operations consequentially.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 1","pages":"117-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advent of robot-assisted surgery, user-friendly technologies have been applied to the da Vinci surgical system (dVSS), and their efficacy has been validated in worldwide surgical fields. However, further improvements are required to the traditional manipulation methods, which cannot control an endoscope and surgical instruments simultaneously. This study proposes a speech recognition control interface (SRCI) for controlling the endoscope via speech commands while manipulating surgical instruments to replace the traditional method. The usability-focused comparisons of the newly proposed SRCI-based and the traditional manipulation method were conducted based on ISO 9241-11. 20 surgeons and 18 novices evaluated both manipulation methods through the line tracking task (LTT) and sea spike pod task (SSPT). After the tasks, they responded to the globally reliable questionnaires: after-scenario questionnaire (ASQ), system usability scale (SUS), and NASA task load index (TLX). The completion times in the LTT and SSPT using the proposed method were 44.72% and 26.59% respectively less than the traditional method, which shows statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). The overall results of ASQ, SUS, and NASA TLX were positive for the proposed method, especially substantial reductions in the workloads such as physical demands and efforts (p < 0.05). The proposed speech-mediated method can be a candidate suitable for the simultaneous manipulation of an endoscope and surgical instruments in dVSS-used robotic surgery. Therefore, it can replace the traditional method when controlling the endoscope while manipulating the surgical instruments, which contributes to enabling the continuous surgical flow in operations consequentially.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5.

语言介导的达芬奇手术系统对连续手术流的操纵。
随着机器人辅助手术的出现,用户友好技术已被应用于达芬奇手术系统(dVSS),其有效性已在世界范围内的外科领域得到验证。然而,传统的操作方法不能同时控制内窥镜和手术器械,需要进一步改进。本研究提出一种语音识别控制接口(SRCI),用于在操作手术器械时通过语音指令控制内窥镜,以取代传统的方法。基于ISO 9241-11标准,对新提出的基于srci的操作方法和传统的操作方法进行了可用性比较。20名外科医生和18名新手通过线跟踪任务(LTT)和海钉吊舱任务(SSPT)评估两种操作方法。任务结束后,他们回答了全球可靠的问卷:场景后问卷(ASQ)、系统可用性量表(SUS)和NASA任务负载指数(TLX)。与传统方法相比,本文方法在LTT和SSPT中的完成时间分别减少44.72%和26.59%,差异有统计学意义(p p)。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s13534-024-00429-5获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信