What's been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184
Carol Sinnott, Evleen Price, Akbar Ansari, Rebecca Fisher, Jake Beech, Hugh Alderwick, Mary Dixon-Woods
{"title":"What's been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice.","authors":"Carol Sinnott, Evleen Price, Akbar Ansari, Rebecca Fisher, Jake Beech, Hugh Alderwick, Mary Dixon-Woods","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although increasing numbers of appointments are being provided, public satisfaction with access to UK general practice is declining. Previous attempts to improve access have not been systematically collated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify interventions to improve access to general practice in the UK, to organise these interventions into thematic categories, and to identify which aspects of access are targeted.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Narrative systematic review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A three-stage search was conducted to identify interventions used to improve access to NHS general practice. Using an iterative process, we generated thematic categories to classify interventions according to how they are intended to work. We assessed which aspects of access they addressed using the seven-feature Candidacy Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 449 relevant sources reporting on interventions to improve access to general practice over the period 1984-2023. We generated six overarching thematic categories into which we organised these interventions: appointment innovations; direct patient access to services; increasing the number and range of professionals available in general practice; offering contacts beyond core hours, core settings and core services; supporting patient engagement; and supporting the wider structures of general practice. We assessed which features of Candidacy were addressed, with \"permeability\" (the ease with which people can use) services emerging as the most frequent feature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple and diverse attempts have been made to improve access in general practice over a 40-year period. This curated, thematised catalogue offers an important resource for future efforts to improve access.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although increasing numbers of appointments are being provided, public satisfaction with access to UK general practice is declining. Previous attempts to improve access have not been systematically collated.

Aim: We aimed to identify interventions to improve access to general practice in the UK, to organise these interventions into thematic categories, and to identify which aspects of access are targeted.

Design & setting: Narrative systematic review.

Method: A three-stage search was conducted to identify interventions used to improve access to NHS general practice. Using an iterative process, we generated thematic categories to classify interventions according to how they are intended to work. We assessed which aspects of access they addressed using the seven-feature Candidacy Framework.

Results: The search identified 449 relevant sources reporting on interventions to improve access to general practice over the period 1984-2023. We generated six overarching thematic categories into which we organised these interventions: appointment innovations; direct patient access to services; increasing the number and range of professionals available in general practice; offering contacts beyond core hours, core settings and core services; supporting patient engagement; and supporting the wider structures of general practice. We assessed which features of Candidacy were addressed, with "permeability" (the ease with which people can use) services emerging as the most frequent feature.

Conclusion: Multiple and diverse attempts have been made to improve access in general practice over a 40-year period. This curated, thematised catalogue offers an important resource for future efforts to improve access.

已经尝试过的:一个精心策划的努力目录,以改善获得全科治疗的机会。
背景:虽然越来越多的预约正在提供,公众满意度访问英国全科医生正在下降。以前改善准入的尝试没有得到系统的整理。目的:我们的目的是确定干预措施,以改善在英国获得全科实践,将这些干预措施组织成专题类别,并确定哪些方面的获取是有针对性的。设计与设置:叙述性系统回顾。方法:进行了三个阶段的搜索,以确定用于改善NHS全科实践的干预措施。使用迭代过程,我们生成主题类别,根据干预措施的工作方式对其进行分类。我们使用七个特征候选框架评估了他们解决了哪些方面的访问问题。结果:检索确定了449个相关来源,报告了1984-2023年期间改善全科医疗可及性的干预措施。我们产生了六个总体主题类别,我们将这些干预措施组织在其中:任命创新;患者直接获得服务;增加全科医疗专业人员的数量和范围;提供核心时间、核心设置和核心服务以外的联系;支持患者参与;支持更广泛的全科医疗结构。我们评估了候选资格的哪些特性得到了解决,“渗透性”(人们可以轻松使用)服务成为最常见的特性。结论:在过去的40年里,为提高全科实践的可及性,进行了多种多样的尝试。这一编排的专题目录为今后努力改善获取提供了重要资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信