Inequalities in cancer two-week-wait referrals: a cross-sectional study in English general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0052
Stephanie C Wynne, Mark Ashworth
{"title":"Inequalities in cancer two-week-wait referrals: a cross-sectional study in English general practice.","authors":"Stephanie C Wynne, Mark Ashworth","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practices with higher two-week-wait (2WW) referral-rates demonstrate higher survival for several cancers. Yet, there is little up-to-date evidence exploring factors influencing 2WW-referral-rates and whether health inequalities exist, particularly after COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish which patient-factors (eg, age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation) and practice-factors (eg, remote consultations, frequency of seeing a preferred-GP) independently predict 2WW-referral-rates.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A cross-sectional, observational study was performed using data from English general practices for 2021-2022.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multivariable linear regression was used to identify the strongest, independent predictors of 2WW-referral-rates for all-cancers (primary outcome) and for breast, lower-gastrointestinal, lung and skin cancers separately (secondary outcome).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 6307 practices. Practices with more females, patients aged 75+and with a greater burden of long-term conditions were associated with higher 2WW-referrals for all-cancers, as were practices in Northwest England and those with higher scores for patients feeling involved in care decisions. Conversely, practices with a higher frequency of seeing a preferred-GP were predictive of fewer all-cancer 2WW-referrals. Whilst practices with a higher proportion of current smokers and Asian and Black ethnicity patients predicted fewer all-cancer 2WW-referrals, these associations were strongest for skin cancer, and for breast cancer (except for Black ethnicity). Higher socioeconomic deprivation predicted lower 2WW-referrals for lung cancer only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study analyses factors influencing 2WW-referral-rates and highlights potential inequalities. This work identifies priority populations, including smokers and Asian and Black ethnicity patients, who may benefit from interventions to increase primary care access. Shared-decision-making may be an underexplored resource for increasing all-cancer 2WW-referral-rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Practices with higher two-week-wait (2WW) referral-rates demonstrate higher survival for several cancers. Yet, there is little up-to-date evidence exploring factors influencing 2WW-referral-rates and whether health inequalities exist, particularly after COVID-19.

Aim: To establish which patient-factors (eg, age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation) and practice-factors (eg, remote consultations, frequency of seeing a preferred-GP) independently predict 2WW-referral-rates.

Design & setting: A cross-sectional, observational study was performed using data from English general practices for 2021-2022.

Method: Multivariable linear regression was used to identify the strongest, independent predictors of 2WW-referral-rates for all-cancers (primary outcome) and for breast, lower-gastrointestinal, lung and skin cancers separately (secondary outcome).

Results: The analysis included 6307 practices. Practices with more females, patients aged 75+and with a greater burden of long-term conditions were associated with higher 2WW-referrals for all-cancers, as were practices in Northwest England and those with higher scores for patients feeling involved in care decisions. Conversely, practices with a higher frequency of seeing a preferred-GP were predictive of fewer all-cancer 2WW-referrals. Whilst practices with a higher proportion of current smokers and Asian and Black ethnicity patients predicted fewer all-cancer 2WW-referrals, these associations were strongest for skin cancer, and for breast cancer (except for Black ethnicity). Higher socioeconomic deprivation predicted lower 2WW-referrals for lung cancer only.

Conclusion: This study analyses factors influencing 2WW-referral-rates and highlights potential inequalities. This work identifies priority populations, including smokers and Asian and Black ethnicity patients, who may benefit from interventions to increase primary care access. Shared-decision-making may be an underexplored resource for increasing all-cancer 2WW-referral-rates.

癌症两周等待转诊的不平等:英国全科实践的横断面研究。
背景:高两周等待(2WW)转诊率的做法表明,几种癌症的生存率更高。然而,很少有最新证据探讨影响转诊率的因素以及卫生不平等是否存在,特别是在COVID-19之后。目的:确定哪些患者因素(如年龄、性别、种族、贫困)和实践因素(如远程咨询、看首选全科医生的频率)独立预测2ww转诊率。设计与背景:采用2021-2022年英国全科实践的数据进行横断面观察性研究。方法:采用多变量线性回归来确定所有癌症(主要结局)和乳腺癌、下胃肠道、肺癌和皮肤癌(次要结局)的2ww转诊率的最强独立预测因子。结果:共分析6307例。女性患者、75岁以上患者和长期疾病负担更重的患者越多,所有癌症的2w转诊率就越高,英格兰西北部的实践和那些感觉参与护理决策的患者得分越高的实践也是如此。相反,看首选全科医生的频率越高,所有癌症的转诊次数就越少。虽然目前吸烟者比例较高,亚洲和黑人患者预测所有癌症2ww转诊较少,但这些关联在皮肤癌和乳腺癌(黑人除外)中最强。较高的社会经济剥夺预示着较低的肺癌转诊。结论:本研究分析了影响2ww转诊率的因素,并突出了潜在的不平等。这项工作确定了优先人群,包括吸烟者、亚洲和黑人患者,他们可能从增加初级保健获取的干预措施中受益。共同决策可能是提高所有癌症2w转诊率的一个未被充分开发的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信