Chemotherapy as an optimal treatment option after failure of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma.

Q4 Medicine
D Šulc
{"title":"Chemotherapy as an optimal treatment option after failure of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma.","authors":"D Šulc","doi":"10.48095/ccko2024445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no standard option that can be routinely recommended for the treatment of advanced melanoma after failure of modern immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Chemotherapy is an option, but its role is considered to be questionable. These doubts are based on historical experiences with chemotherapy, however, there is a lack of evidence of chemotherapy effectiveness after previous treatment with modern systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>At our institution, we managed to collect a set of 23 patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who failed modern systemic treatment based on anti-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy or after failure of BRAFi (+MEKi) targeted treatments in the years 2017-2023. Dacarbazine monochemotherapy was indicated as further line systemic treatment for all these patients. The treatment effect was evaluated according to the RECIST/iRECIST criteria, and we also earned survival data for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our group, we observed substantial treatment response rate (complete remission 3times, partial remission 6times, response rate 39 %, stable disease twice), as well as long duration of those responses. Overall survival from the start of the therapy on second- or third-line dacarbazine in this group was 14.7 months and progression free survival was 9.3 months. In cases where a clinical benefit was achieved (complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease - 11times, 48%), the progression-free survival and overall survival values are 16.4 and 23.3 months respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These excellent results show that the role of chemotherapy in this indication should not be doubted. Obviously, this raises questions about the reasons why these unexpectedly good results were achieved. We should seriously consider the possibility that previous immunotherapy does have a sensitizing and potentiating effect for subsequent chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35565,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka Onkologie","volume":"39 6","pages":"445-450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccko2024445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no standard option that can be routinely recommended for the treatment of advanced melanoma after failure of modern immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Chemotherapy is an option, but its role is considered to be questionable. These doubts are based on historical experiences with chemotherapy, however, there is a lack of evidence of chemotherapy effectiveness after previous treatment with modern systemic therapy.

Patients and methods: At our institution, we managed to collect a set of 23 patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who failed modern systemic treatment based on anti-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy or after failure of BRAFi (+MEKi) targeted treatments in the years 2017-2023. Dacarbazine monochemotherapy was indicated as further line systemic treatment for all these patients. The treatment effect was evaluated according to the RECIST/iRECIST criteria, and we also earned survival data for all patients.

Results: In our group, we observed substantial treatment response rate (complete remission 3times, partial remission 6times, response rate 39 %, stable disease twice), as well as long duration of those responses. Overall survival from the start of the therapy on second- or third-line dacarbazine in this group was 14.7 months and progression free survival was 9.3 months. In cases where a clinical benefit was achieved (complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease - 11times, 48%), the progression-free survival and overall survival values are 16.4 and 23.3 months respectively.

Conclusion: These excellent results show that the role of chemotherapy in this indication should not be doubted. Obviously, this raises questions about the reasons why these unexpectedly good results were achieved. We should seriously consider the possibility that previous immunotherapy does have a sensitizing and potentiating effect for subsequent chemotherapy.

化疗作为晚期和转移性黑色素瘤免疫治疗和靶向治疗失败后的最佳治疗选择。
背景:目前,对于现代免疫治疗和/或靶向治疗失败的晚期黑色素瘤,还没有常规推荐的标准治疗方案。化疗是一种选择,但它的作用被认为是值得怀疑的。这些怀疑是基于化疗的历史经验,然而,缺乏证据表明化疗在既往的现代全身治疗后有效。患者和方法:在我们的机构,我们设法收集了一组23例晚期皮肤黑色素瘤患者,这些患者在2017-2023年间,基于抗pd -1抗体免疫治疗的现代全身治疗失败或BRAFi (+MEKi)靶向治疗失败。达卡巴嗪单药化疗是所有这些患者的进一步全身性治疗。根据RECIST/iRECIST标准评估治疗效果,我们还获得了所有患者的生存数据。结果:本组患者治疗有效率高(完全缓解3次,部分缓解6次,缓解率39%,病情稳定2次),且持续时间长。该组患者接受二线或三线达卡巴嗪治疗后的总生存期为14.7个月,无进展生存期为9.3个月。在获得临床获益的病例中(完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定- 11次,48%),无进展生存期和总生存期分别为16.4个月和23.3个月。结论:这些优异的结果表明化疗在这一适应症中的作用不容置疑。显然,这就提出了为什么会取得这些意想不到的好结果的问题。我们应该认真考虑以前的免疫治疗对随后的化疗有增敏和增强作用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka Onkologie
Klinicka Onkologie Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信