COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH: A CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK ANALYSIS (2000-2023).

Q2 Medicine
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083
Naruaki Ogasawara
{"title":"COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH: A CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK ANALYSIS (2000-2023).","authors":"Naruaki Ogasawara","doi":"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the co-authorship network in Gastroenterology research, focusing on publications from 2000 to 2023, to understand the collaborative relationships among researchers and identify key contributors in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), I examined 18,855 Gastroenterology-related articles published between 2000 and 2023. The analysis was conducted using Python within the PyCharm environment. I assessed the network at both macro and micro levels. Macro-level indicators included network density, clustering coefficient, components, and average path length. Micro-level indicators included degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, which helped identify influential researchers and research groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed an evolution from a fragmented and sparsely connected network in the early 2000s to a more interconnected structure in recent years. Despite the overall increase in network density and clustering, full integration was not achieved, with many researchers remaining in isolated clusters. Key researchers such as Gasbarrini G., Vandenplas Y., and Hassan C. were identified as central figures within the network, playing crucial roles in fostering collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the ongoing development of collaborative networks in Gastroenterology research, identifying influential researchers and groups that drive advancements in the field. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing future research collaborations, particularly in areas where Japan excels, such as endoscopic technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":35671,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","volume":"61 ","pages":"e24083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze the co-authorship network in Gastroenterology research, focusing on publications from 2000 to 2023, to understand the collaborative relationships among researchers and identify key contributors in the field.

Methods: Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), I examined 18,855 Gastroenterology-related articles published between 2000 and 2023. The analysis was conducted using Python within the PyCharm environment. I assessed the network at both macro and micro levels. Macro-level indicators included network density, clustering coefficient, components, and average path length. Micro-level indicators included degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, which helped identify influential researchers and research groups.

Results: The analysis revealed an evolution from a fragmented and sparsely connected network in the early 2000s to a more interconnected structure in recent years. Despite the overall increase in network density and clustering, full integration was not achieved, with many researchers remaining in isolated clusters. Key researchers such as Gasbarrini G., Vandenplas Y., and Hassan C. were identified as central figures within the network, playing crucial roles in fostering collaboration.

Conclusion: The study highlights the ongoing development of collaborative networks in Gastroenterology research, identifying influential researchers and groups that drive advancements in the field. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing future research collaborations, particularly in areas where Japan excels, such as endoscopic technology.

胃肠病学研究中的合作网络:合作作者网络分析(2000-2023)。
背景:本研究旨在分析胃肠病学研究的合著者网络,重点分析2000年至2023年发表的论文,了解研究人员之间的合作关系,并确定该领域的关键贡献者。方法:使用来自Web of Science (WoS)的数据,我检查了2000年至2023年间发表的18855篇胃肠病学相关文章。分析是在PyCharm环境中使用Python进行的。我从宏观和微观两个层面对网络进行了评估。宏观指标包括网络密度、聚类系数、成分、平均路径长度等。微观层面的指标包括度中心性、接近中心性和中间中心性,这些指标有助于确定有影响力的研究人员和研究小组。结果:分析表明,从21世纪初的碎片化和稀疏连接的网络到近年来更加相互关联的结构的演变。尽管网络密度和聚类总体上有所增加,但没有实现完全的整合,许多研究人员仍然处于孤立的集群中。Gasbarrini G.、Vandenplas Y.和Hassan C.等关键研究人员被认为是网络中的核心人物,在促进合作方面发挥着关键作用。结论:该研究突出了胃肠病学研究中协作网络的持续发展,确定了推动该领域进步的有影响力的研究人员和团体。这些发现为加强未来的研究合作提供了有价值的见解,特别是在日本擅长的领域,如内窥镜技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Arquivos de Gastroenterologia (Archives of Gastroenterology), a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia IBEPEGE (Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology), Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD (Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery) and of the Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD (Brazilian Digestive Motility Society). It is dedicated to the publishing of scientific papers by national and foreign researchers who are in agreement with the aim of the journal as well as with its editorial policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信