Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nikhil Agarwal, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Nick D Clement
{"title":"Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Nikhil Agarwal, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Nick D Clement","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates.

Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance.

Results: Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30).

Conclusion: This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization.

髋部骨折患者使用阿芬太尼的早期活动率优于标准阿片类镇痛(康复)吗?前瞻性队列研究的方案。
目的:本研究的主要目的是比较口服羟考酮和皮下阿芬太尼作为镇痛方法的患者在活动前的活动状况,以帮助髋部骨折手术后物理治疗的依从性。次要目的是评估术后疼痛、健康相关生活质量、住院时间、术后第1天和第2天(POD 1和POD 2)镇痛的总使用情况、30天内的并发症发生率和30天死亡率。方法:对64例患者进行单中心前瞻性队列研究。在研究中心接受股骨颈骨折手术的患者将被招募。符合纳入/排除标准的髋部骨折患者将在入院时纳入研究。使用口服羟考酮的患者将与使用阿芬太尼治疗活动前疼痛的患者进行比较,由物理治疗师对POD 1和POD 2进行治疗。患者服用哪种药物取决于医疗团队开出的处方,在目前的实践中,这一比例约为50:50。活动将被定义为在有或没有帮助的情况下双脚站立和承受重量的能力。结果:视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、活动状态和总镇痛使用将在POD 1和POD 2上进行评估。EuroQol五维健康问卷评分、并发症发生率和死亡率将在手术后30天(POD 1、2、7和30)进行评估。结论:本研究将有助于建立一个更广泛的方案,旨在改善髋部骨折术后早期活动。这项研究的结果将提供疼痛评分和活动状态,这将支持在物理治疗之前使用皮下阿芬太尼作为标准镇痛方式,或者突出其与标准口服羟考酮相比的局限性。次要结果也将有助于评估与延迟动员相比,早期动员是否能改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信