{"title":"Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Xuezhu Xu, Rui Liu, Hongli Chen, Ruoyu Yang, Gongzhizi Gao, Aili He, Fangxia Wang","doi":"10.1177/20406207241311776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical resources, especially blood products, were in short supply during the COVID-19. Less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (VEN) seems an effective treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with azacitidine (AZA) in young adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 25 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from January 2021 to December 2023 at our center were collected, compared with a randomized historical study cohort that was administered intensive chemotherapy (IC) from January 2018 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No rate of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Compared to traditional IC, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission was achieved more quickly in patients treated with VEN + AZA regimens (after cycle 1: 8% in the IC group vs 56% in the VEN group, <i>p</i> = 0.0004; after cycle 2: 16% in the IC group vs 72% in the VEN group, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), especially in those AML patients who had a poor prognosis. The dependency of transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) and platelets during induction treatment was significantly lower in the VEN + AZA group (RBC: <i>p</i> = 0.0269; platelet: <i>p</i> = 0.0054). Compared with the standard IC, the incidence rate of non-hematological adverse events in VEN + AZA group was significantly decreased (infection: 100% vs 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.0001; gastrointestinal side effects: 48% vs 12%, <i>p</i> = 0.0055). The total hospitalization cost of the VEN group was significantly less than that of the IC group (<i>p</i> = 0.0395).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our study indicated that VEN + AZA with a higher MRD-negative remission rate and less toxic appeared to be a therapy option for young patients with ND AML. However, further well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm the benefits of VEN + AZA in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406207241311776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207241311776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medical resources, especially blood products, were in short supply during the COVID-19. Less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (VEN) seems an effective treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Objectives: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with azacitidine (AZA) in young adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML.
Design: This was a retrospective study.
Methods: The clinical data of 25 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from January 2021 to December 2023 at our center were collected, compared with a randomized historical study cohort that was administered intensive chemotherapy (IC) from January 2018 to December 2019.
Results: No rate of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Compared to traditional IC, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission was achieved more quickly in patients treated with VEN + AZA regimens (after cycle 1: 8% in the IC group vs 56% in the VEN group, p = 0.0004; after cycle 2: 16% in the IC group vs 72% in the VEN group, p = 0.0001), especially in those AML patients who had a poor prognosis. The dependency of transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) and platelets during induction treatment was significantly lower in the VEN + AZA group (RBC: p = 0.0269; platelet: p = 0.0054). Compared with the standard IC, the incidence rate of non-hematological adverse events in VEN + AZA group was significantly decreased (infection: 100% vs 20%, p = 0.0001; gastrointestinal side effects: 48% vs 12%, p = 0.0055). The total hospitalization cost of the VEN group was significantly less than that of the IC group (p = 0.0395).
Conclusion: In conclusion, our study indicated that VEN + AZA with a higher MRD-negative remission rate and less toxic appeared to be a therapy option for young patients with ND AML. However, further well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm the benefits of VEN + AZA in this population.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.