Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406207241311776
Xuezhu Xu, Rui Liu, Hongli Chen, Ruoyu Yang, Gongzhizi Gao, Aili He, Fangxia Wang
{"title":"Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Xuezhu Xu, Rui Liu, Hongli Chen, Ruoyu Yang, Gongzhizi Gao, Aili He, Fangxia Wang","doi":"10.1177/20406207241311776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical resources, especially blood products, were in short supply during the COVID-19. Less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (VEN) seems an effective treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with azacitidine (AZA) in young adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 25 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from January 2021 to December 2023 at our center were collected, compared with a randomized historical study cohort that was administered intensive chemotherapy (IC) from January 2018 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No rate of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Compared to traditional IC, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission was achieved more quickly in patients treated with VEN + AZA regimens (after cycle 1: 8% in the IC group vs 56% in the VEN group, <i>p</i> = 0.0004; after cycle 2: 16% in the IC group vs 72% in the VEN group, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), especially in those AML patients who had a poor prognosis. The dependency of transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) and platelets during induction treatment was significantly lower in the VEN + AZA group (RBC: <i>p</i> = 0.0269; platelet: <i>p</i> = 0.0054). Compared with the standard IC, the incidence rate of non-hematological adverse events in VEN + AZA group was significantly decreased (infection: 100% vs 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.0001; gastrointestinal side effects: 48% vs 12%, <i>p</i> = 0.0055). The total hospitalization cost of the VEN group was significantly less than that of the IC group (<i>p</i> = 0.0395).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our study indicated that VEN + AZA with a higher MRD-negative remission rate and less toxic appeared to be a therapy option for young patients with ND AML. However, further well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm the benefits of VEN + AZA in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406207241311776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207241311776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical resources, especially blood products, were in short supply during the COVID-19. Less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (VEN) seems an effective treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Objectives: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with azacitidine (AZA) in young adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML.

Design: This was a retrospective study.

Methods: The clinical data of 25 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from January 2021 to December 2023 at our center were collected, compared with a randomized historical study cohort that was administered intensive chemotherapy (IC) from January 2018 to December 2019.

Results: No rate of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Compared to traditional IC, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission was achieved more quickly in patients treated with VEN + AZA regimens (after cycle 1: 8% in the IC group vs 56% in the VEN group, p = 0.0004; after cycle 2: 16% in the IC group vs 72% in the VEN group, p = 0.0001), especially in those AML patients who had a poor prognosis. The dependency of transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) and platelets during induction treatment was significantly lower in the VEN + AZA group (RBC: p = 0.0269; platelet: p = 0.0054). Compared with the standard IC, the incidence rate of non-hematological adverse events in VEN + AZA group was significantly decreased (infection: 100% vs 20%, p = 0.0001; gastrointestinal side effects: 48% vs 12%, p = 0.0055). The total hospitalization cost of the VEN group was significantly less than that of the IC group (p = 0.0395).

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study indicated that VEN + AZA with a higher MRD-negative remission rate and less toxic appeared to be a therapy option for young patients with ND AML. However, further well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm the benefits of VEN + AZA in this population.

venetoclax联合阿扎胞苷治疗新诊断急性髓性白血病的单中心经验。
背景:疫情期间,医疗资源尤其是血液制品供不应求。低甲基化药物/venetoclax (VEN)的低强度治疗似乎是急性髓性白血病(AML)患者的有效治疗选择。目的:回顾性分析VEN联合阿扎胞苷(AZA)治疗年轻成人新诊断AML (ND)的疗效和安全性。设计:这是一项回顾性研究。方法:收集本中心2021年1月至2023年12月25例接受VEN + AZA方案治疗的AML患者的临床资料,并与2018年1月至2019年12月接受强化化疗(IC)的随机历史研究队列进行比较。结果:两组患者的完全缓解率/完全缓解率伴计数不完全恢复率差异无统计学意义。与传统IC相比,VEN + AZA方案治疗的患者实现最小残留病(MRD)阴性缓解的速度更快(第1周期后:IC组为8%,VEN组为56%,p = 0.0004;周期2后:IC组为16%,VEN组为72%,p = 0.0001),尤其是那些预后较差的AML患者。VEN + AZA组在诱导治疗期间对红细胞(RBC)和血小板的输注依赖性显著降低(RBC: p = 0.0269;血小板:p = 0.0054)。与标准IC组相比,VEN + AZA组非血液学不良事件发生率显著降低(感染:100% vs 20%, p = 0.0001;胃肠道副作用:48% vs 12%, p = 0.0055)。VEN组总住院费用显著低于IC组(p = 0.0395)。结论:总之,我们的研究表明,具有更高mrd阴性缓解率和更小毒性的VEN + AZA似乎是年轻ND AML患者的治疗选择。然而,需要进一步设计良好的研究,纳入更多的患者,以证实VEN + AZA在这一人群中的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信