Lindsey A Vandergrift, Amber D Rice, Keith Primeau, Joshua B Gaither, Rachel D Munn, Philipp L Hannan, Mary C Knotts, Adrienne Hollen, Brian Stevens, Justin Lara, Melody Glenn
{"title":"Precipitated Withdrawal Induced by Prehospital Naloxone Administration.","authors":"Lindsey A Vandergrift, Amber D Rice, Keith Primeau, Joshua B Gaither, Rachel D Munn, Philipp L Hannan, Mary C Knotts, Adrienne Hollen, Brian Stevens, Justin Lara, Melody Glenn","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine is becoming a key component of prehospital management of opioid use disorder. It is unclear how many prehospital patients might be eligible for buprenorphine induction, as traditional induction requires that patients first have some degree of opioid withdrawal. The primary aim of this study was to quantify how many patients developed precipitated withdrawal after receiving prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose, as they could be candidates for prehospital buprenorphine. The secondary objective was to identify associated factors contributing to precipitated withdrawal, including dose of naloxone administered, and identify rate of subsequent transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study reviewing electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) from March 2019 to April 2023 in a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system was performed. Cases were included if naloxone was administered during the prehospital interval and excluded if the patient was in cardiac arrest upon arrival and died on scene. Precipitated opioid withdrawal was defined using reliably available ePCR data points measured by the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale: administration of an antiemetic or sedative, persistent tachycardia, or new tachycardia after naloxone. Descriptive statistics were calculated to quantify the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. Risk ratios were calculated to identify variables associated with outcomes of interest. A subgroup analysis was performed examining patients explicitly diagnosed with an overdose by EMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 4561 individuals were given naloxone, and 2124 (46.2%) met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who received multiple doses of naloxone were more likely to meet our precipitated withdrawal definition versus those who received a single dose (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28). Patients who experienced precipitated withdrawal were more likely to accept transportation than those who did not experience withdrawal (RR 1.08 95% CI 1.04-1.12). Persistent tachycardia (80.3%) was the most common criterion met for our definition of precipitated withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost half of patients who received a dose of prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who met our precipitated withdrawal definition were more likely to have received greater doses of naloxone and were more likely to accept transport to an emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2449505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Buprenorphine is becoming a key component of prehospital management of opioid use disorder. It is unclear how many prehospital patients might be eligible for buprenorphine induction, as traditional induction requires that patients first have some degree of opioid withdrawal. The primary aim of this study was to quantify how many patients developed precipitated withdrawal after receiving prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose, as they could be candidates for prehospital buprenorphine. The secondary objective was to identify associated factors contributing to precipitated withdrawal, including dose of naloxone administered, and identify rate of subsequent transport.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study reviewing electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) from March 2019 to April 2023 in a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system was performed. Cases were included if naloxone was administered during the prehospital interval and excluded if the patient was in cardiac arrest upon arrival and died on scene. Precipitated opioid withdrawal was defined using reliably available ePCR data points measured by the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale: administration of an antiemetic or sedative, persistent tachycardia, or new tachycardia after naloxone. Descriptive statistics were calculated to quantify the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. Risk ratios were calculated to identify variables associated with outcomes of interest. A subgroup analysis was performed examining patients explicitly diagnosed with an overdose by EMS.
Results: During the study period, 4561 individuals were given naloxone, and 2124 (46.2%) met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who received multiple doses of naloxone were more likely to meet our precipitated withdrawal definition versus those who received a single dose (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28). Patients who experienced precipitated withdrawal were more likely to accept transportation than those who did not experience withdrawal (RR 1.08 95% CI 1.04-1.12). Persistent tachycardia (80.3%) was the most common criterion met for our definition of precipitated withdrawal.
Conclusions: Almost half of patients who received a dose of prehospital naloxone for suspected overdose met our proxy criteria for precipitated withdrawal. Patients who met our precipitated withdrawal definition were more likely to have received greater doses of naloxone and were more likely to accept transport to an emergency department.
丁丙诺啡正成为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)院前管理的关键组成部分。目前尚不清楚有多少院前患者可能适合丁丙诺啡诱导,因为传统的诱导要求患者首先有一定程度的阿片类药物戒断。本研究的主要目的是量化有多少患者在院前接受纳洛酮治疗后出现沉淀戒断,因为他们可能是院前丁丙诺啡的候选人。次要目的是确定导致提前停药的相关因素,包括纳洛酮的剂量,并确定随后的转运率。方法:回顾性队列研究回顾了2019年3月至2023年4月在单一紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中的电子患者护理报告(epcr)。如果在院前间隔使用纳洛酮,则纳入病例,如果患者到达时心脏骤停并在现场死亡,则排除病例。通过临床阿片类药物戒断量表(COWS)测量可靠的ePCR数据点来定义沉淀性阿片类药物戒断:给药止吐剂或镇静剂、持续性心动过速或纳洛酮后新的心动过速。计算描述性统计以量化急性停药的发生率。计算风险比以确定与感兴趣的结果相关的变量。对EMS明确诊断为用药过量的患者进行亚组分析。结果:在研究期间,4561人服用了纳洛酮,其中2124人(46.2%)符合我们的代用标准。接受多剂量纳洛酮治疗的患者比接受单剂量纳洛酮治疗的患者更有可能满足我们的沉淀戒断定义(RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28)。经历过急性停药的患者比没有经历过停药的患者更容易接受转运(RR 1.08 95% CI 1.04-1.12)。持续性心动过速(80.3%)是我们定义的沉淀性停药最常见的标准。结论:在院前接受纳洛酮治疗疑似过量的患者中,几乎有一半符合我们的代用标准。符合我们的急性戒断定义的患者更有可能接受更大剂量的纳洛酮,更有可能接受转到急诊室。
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.